Cargando…

Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey

BACKGROUND: Digital health research repositories propose sharing longitudinal streams of health records and personal sensing data between multiple projects and researchers. Motivated by the prospect of personalizing patient care (precision medicine), these initiatives demand broad public acceptance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes Vilaza, Giovanna, Coyle, David, Bardram, Jakob Eyvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714253
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/31294
_version_ 1784598904792154112
author Nunes Vilaza, Giovanna
Coyle, David
Bardram, Jakob Eyvind
author_facet Nunes Vilaza, Giovanna
Coyle, David
Bardram, Jakob Eyvind
author_sort Nunes Vilaza, Giovanna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital health research repositories propose sharing longitudinal streams of health records and personal sensing data between multiple projects and researchers. Motivated by the prospect of personalizing patient care (precision medicine), these initiatives demand broad public acceptance and large numbers of data contributors, both of which are challenging. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates public attitudes toward possibly contributing to digital health research repositories to identify factors for their acceptance and to inform future developments. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from March 2020 to December 2020. Because of the funded project scope and a multicenter collaboration, study recruitment targeted young adults in Denmark and Brazil, allowing an analysis of the differences between 2 very contrasting national contexts. Through closed-ended questions, the survey examined participants’ willingness to share different data types, data access preferences, reasons for concern, and motivations to contribute. The survey also collected information about participants’ demographics, level of interest in health topics, previous participation in health research, awareness of examples of existing research data repositories, and current attitudes about digital health research repositories. Data analysis consisted of descriptive frequency measures and statistical inferences (bivariate associations and logistic regressions). RESULTS: The sample comprises 1017 respondents living in Brazil (1017/1600, 63.56%) and 583 in Denmark (583/1600, 36.44%). The demographics do not differ substantially between participants of these countries. The majority is aged between 18 and 27 years (933/1600, 58.31%), is highly educated (992/1600, 62.00%), uses smartphones (1562/1600, 97.63%), and is in good health (1407/1600, 87.94%). The analysis shows a vast majority were very motivated by helping future patients (1366/1600, 85.38%) and researchers (1253/1600, 78.31%), yet very concerned about unethical projects (1219/1600, 76.19%), profit making without consent (1096/1600, 68.50%), and cyberattacks (1055/1600, 65.94%). Participants’ willingness to share data is lower when sharing personal sensing data, such as the content of calls and texts (1206/1600, 75.38%), in contrast to more traditional health research information. Only 13.44% (215/1600) find it desirable to grant data access to private companies, and most would like to stay informed about which projects use their data (1334/1600, 83.38%) and control future data access (1181/1600, 73.81%). Findings indicate that favorable attitudes toward digital health research repositories are related to a personal interest in health topics (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.02; P=.01), previous participation in health research studies (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.24-2.35; P=.001), and awareness of examples of research repositories (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.83-4.38; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals essential factors for acceptance and willingness to share personal data with digital health research repositories. Implications include the importance of being more transparent about the goals and beneficiaries of research projects using and re-using data from repositories, providing participants with greater autonomy for choosing who gets access to which parts of their data, and raising public awareness of the benefits of data sharing for research. In addition, future developments should engage with and reduce risks for those unwilling to participate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8590194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85901942021-12-07 Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey Nunes Vilaza, Giovanna Coyle, David Bardram, Jakob Eyvind J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital health research repositories propose sharing longitudinal streams of health records and personal sensing data between multiple projects and researchers. Motivated by the prospect of personalizing patient care (precision medicine), these initiatives demand broad public acceptance and large numbers of data contributors, both of which are challenging. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates public attitudes toward possibly contributing to digital health research repositories to identify factors for their acceptance and to inform future developments. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from March 2020 to December 2020. Because of the funded project scope and a multicenter collaboration, study recruitment targeted young adults in Denmark and Brazil, allowing an analysis of the differences between 2 very contrasting national contexts. Through closed-ended questions, the survey examined participants’ willingness to share different data types, data access preferences, reasons for concern, and motivations to contribute. The survey also collected information about participants’ demographics, level of interest in health topics, previous participation in health research, awareness of examples of existing research data repositories, and current attitudes about digital health research repositories. Data analysis consisted of descriptive frequency measures and statistical inferences (bivariate associations and logistic regressions). RESULTS: The sample comprises 1017 respondents living in Brazil (1017/1600, 63.56%) and 583 in Denmark (583/1600, 36.44%). The demographics do not differ substantially between participants of these countries. The majority is aged between 18 and 27 years (933/1600, 58.31%), is highly educated (992/1600, 62.00%), uses smartphones (1562/1600, 97.63%), and is in good health (1407/1600, 87.94%). The analysis shows a vast majority were very motivated by helping future patients (1366/1600, 85.38%) and researchers (1253/1600, 78.31%), yet very concerned about unethical projects (1219/1600, 76.19%), profit making without consent (1096/1600, 68.50%), and cyberattacks (1055/1600, 65.94%). Participants’ willingness to share data is lower when sharing personal sensing data, such as the content of calls and texts (1206/1600, 75.38%), in contrast to more traditional health research information. Only 13.44% (215/1600) find it desirable to grant data access to private companies, and most would like to stay informed about which projects use their data (1334/1600, 83.38%) and control future data access (1181/1600, 73.81%). Findings indicate that favorable attitudes toward digital health research repositories are related to a personal interest in health topics (odds ratio [OR] 1.49, 95% CI 1.10-2.02; P=.01), previous participation in health research studies (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.24-2.35; P=.001), and awareness of examples of research repositories (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.83-4.38; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals essential factors for acceptance and willingness to share personal data with digital health research repositories. Implications include the importance of being more transparent about the goals and beneficiaries of research projects using and re-using data from repositories, providing participants with greater autonomy for choosing who gets access to which parts of their data, and raising public awareness of the benefits of data sharing for research. In addition, future developments should engage with and reduce risks for those unwilling to participate. JMIR Publications 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8590194/ /pubmed/34714253 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/31294 Text en ©Giovanna Nunes Vilaza, David Coyle, Jakob Eyvind Bardram. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 29.10.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nunes Vilaza, Giovanna
Coyle, David
Bardram, Jakob Eyvind
Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey
title Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey
title_full Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey
title_fullStr Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey
title_full_unstemmed Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey
title_short Public Attitudes to Digital Health Research Repositories: Cross-sectional International Survey
title_sort public attitudes to digital health research repositories: cross-sectional international survey
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714253
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/31294
work_keys_str_mv AT nunesvilazagiovanna publicattitudestodigitalhealthresearchrepositoriescrosssectionalinternationalsurvey
AT coyledavid publicattitudestodigitalhealthresearchrepositoriescrosssectionalinternationalsurvey
AT bardramjakobeyvind publicattitudestodigitalhealthresearchrepositoriescrosssectionalinternationalsurvey