Cargando…

Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response

BACKGROUND: Lymphocytes have dichotomous functions in ischemic stroke. Regulatory T cells are protective, while IL-17A from innate lymphocytes promotes the infarct growth. With recent advances of T cell-subtype specific transgenic mouse models it now has become possible to study the complex interpla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piepke, Marius, Clausen, Bettina H., Ludewig, Peter, Vienhues, Jonas H., Bedke, Tanja, Javidi, Ehsan, Rissiek, Björn, Jank, Larissa, Brockmann, Leonie, Sandrock, Inga, Degenhardt, Karoline, Jander, Alina, Roth, Vanessa, Schädlich, Ines S., Prinz, Immo, Flavell, Richard A., Kobayashi, Yasushi, Renné, Thomas, Gerloff, Christian, Huber, Samuel, Magnus, Tim, Gelderblom, Mathias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02316-7
_version_ 1784598929902403584
author Piepke, Marius
Clausen, Bettina H.
Ludewig, Peter
Vienhues, Jonas H.
Bedke, Tanja
Javidi, Ehsan
Rissiek, Björn
Jank, Larissa
Brockmann, Leonie
Sandrock, Inga
Degenhardt, Karoline
Jander, Alina
Roth, Vanessa
Schädlich, Ines S.
Prinz, Immo
Flavell, Richard A.
Kobayashi, Yasushi
Renné, Thomas
Gerloff, Christian
Huber, Samuel
Magnus, Tim
Gelderblom, Mathias
author_facet Piepke, Marius
Clausen, Bettina H.
Ludewig, Peter
Vienhues, Jonas H.
Bedke, Tanja
Javidi, Ehsan
Rissiek, Björn
Jank, Larissa
Brockmann, Leonie
Sandrock, Inga
Degenhardt, Karoline
Jander, Alina
Roth, Vanessa
Schädlich, Ines S.
Prinz, Immo
Flavell, Richard A.
Kobayashi, Yasushi
Renné, Thomas
Gerloff, Christian
Huber, Samuel
Magnus, Tim
Gelderblom, Mathias
author_sort Piepke, Marius
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymphocytes have dichotomous functions in ischemic stroke. Regulatory T cells are protective, while IL-17A from innate lymphocytes promotes the infarct growth. With recent advances of T cell-subtype specific transgenic mouse models it now has become possible to study the complex interplay of T cell subpopulations in ischemic stroke. METHODS: In a murine model of experimental stroke we analyzed the effects of IL-10 on the functional outcome for up to 14 days post-ischemia and defined the source of IL-10 in ischemic brains based on immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and bone-marrow chimeric mice. We used neutralizing IL-17A antibodies, intrathecal IL-10 injections, and transgenic mouse models which harbor a deletion of the IL-10R on distinct T cell subpopulations to further explore the interplay between IL-10 and IL-17A pathways in the ischemic brain. RESULTS: We demonstrate that IL-10 deficient mice exhibit significantly increased infarct sizes on days 3 and 7 and enlarged brain atrophy and impaired neurological outcome on day 14 following tMCAO. In ischemic brains IL-10 producing immune cells included regulatory T cells, macrophages, and microglia. Neutralization of IL-17A following stroke reversed the worse outcome in IL-10 deficient mice and intracerebral treatment with recombinant IL-10 revealed that IL-10 controlled IL-17A positive lymphocytes in ischemic brains. Importantly, IL-10 acted differentially on αβ and γδ T cells. IL-17A producing CD4(+) αβ T cells were directly controlled via their IL-10-receptor (IL-10R), whereas IL-10 by itself had no direct effect on the IL-17A production in γδ T cells. The control of the IL-17A production in γδ T cells depended on an intact IL10R signaling in regulatory T cells (Tregs). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data indicate a key function of IL-10 in restricting the detrimental IL-17A-signaling in stroke and further supports that IL-17A is a therapeutic opportunity for stroke treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-021-02316-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8590298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85902982021-11-15 Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response Piepke, Marius Clausen, Bettina H. Ludewig, Peter Vienhues, Jonas H. Bedke, Tanja Javidi, Ehsan Rissiek, Björn Jank, Larissa Brockmann, Leonie Sandrock, Inga Degenhardt, Karoline Jander, Alina Roth, Vanessa Schädlich, Ines S. Prinz, Immo Flavell, Richard A. Kobayashi, Yasushi Renné, Thomas Gerloff, Christian Huber, Samuel Magnus, Tim Gelderblom, Mathias J Neuroinflammation Research BACKGROUND: Lymphocytes have dichotomous functions in ischemic stroke. Regulatory T cells are protective, while IL-17A from innate lymphocytes promotes the infarct growth. With recent advances of T cell-subtype specific transgenic mouse models it now has become possible to study the complex interplay of T cell subpopulations in ischemic stroke. METHODS: In a murine model of experimental stroke we analyzed the effects of IL-10 on the functional outcome for up to 14 days post-ischemia and defined the source of IL-10 in ischemic brains based on immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and bone-marrow chimeric mice. We used neutralizing IL-17A antibodies, intrathecal IL-10 injections, and transgenic mouse models which harbor a deletion of the IL-10R on distinct T cell subpopulations to further explore the interplay between IL-10 and IL-17A pathways in the ischemic brain. RESULTS: We demonstrate that IL-10 deficient mice exhibit significantly increased infarct sizes on days 3 and 7 and enlarged brain atrophy and impaired neurological outcome on day 14 following tMCAO. In ischemic brains IL-10 producing immune cells included regulatory T cells, macrophages, and microglia. Neutralization of IL-17A following stroke reversed the worse outcome in IL-10 deficient mice and intracerebral treatment with recombinant IL-10 revealed that IL-10 controlled IL-17A positive lymphocytes in ischemic brains. Importantly, IL-10 acted differentially on αβ and γδ T cells. IL-17A producing CD4(+) αβ T cells were directly controlled via their IL-10-receptor (IL-10R), whereas IL-10 by itself had no direct effect on the IL-17A production in γδ T cells. The control of the IL-17A production in γδ T cells depended on an intact IL10R signaling in regulatory T cells (Tregs). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our data indicate a key function of IL-10 in restricting the detrimental IL-17A-signaling in stroke and further supports that IL-17A is a therapeutic opportunity for stroke treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-021-02316-7. BioMed Central 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8590298/ /pubmed/34772416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02316-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Piepke, Marius
Clausen, Bettina H.
Ludewig, Peter
Vienhues, Jonas H.
Bedke, Tanja
Javidi, Ehsan
Rissiek, Björn
Jank, Larissa
Brockmann, Leonie
Sandrock, Inga
Degenhardt, Karoline
Jander, Alina
Roth, Vanessa
Schädlich, Ines S.
Prinz, Immo
Flavell, Richard A.
Kobayashi, Yasushi
Renné, Thomas
Gerloff, Christian
Huber, Samuel
Magnus, Tim
Gelderblom, Mathias
Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response
title Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response
title_full Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response
title_fullStr Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response
title_full_unstemmed Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response
title_short Interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental Interleukin-17A response
title_sort interleukin-10 improves stroke outcome by controlling the detrimental interleukin-17a response
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34772416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02316-7
work_keys_str_mv AT piepkemarius interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT clausenbettinah interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT ludewigpeter interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT vienhuesjonash interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT bedketanja interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT javidiehsan interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT rissiekbjorn interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT janklarissa interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT brockmannleonie interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT sandrockinga interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT degenhardtkaroline interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT janderalina interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT rothvanessa interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT schadlichiness interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT prinzimmo interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT flavellricharda interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT kobayashiyasushi interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT rennethomas interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT gerloffchristian interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT hubersamuel interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT magnustim interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse
AT gelderblommathias interleukin10improvesstrokeoutcomebycontrollingthedetrimentalinterleukin17aresponse