Cargando…
Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Pressure dressings have been used after open hemorrhoidectomy to protect surgical wounds and manage postoperative bleeding for many years. However, pressure dressings may increase the incidence of postoperative complications, such as urinary retention, medical adhesive-related skin injur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34774091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05750-3 |
_version_ | 1784598930144624640 |
---|---|
author | Xue, Ping Wu, Jing Zhu, Ping Wang, Dan Xu, Mei Zhang, Yi Lu, Guanmao Chen, Quanyi Zhang, Qin Tang, Renjin Fang, Jinbo |
author_facet | Xue, Ping Wu, Jing Zhu, Ping Wang, Dan Xu, Mei Zhang, Yi Lu, Guanmao Chen, Quanyi Zhang, Qin Tang, Renjin Fang, Jinbo |
author_sort | Xue, Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pressure dressings have been used after open hemorrhoidectomy to protect surgical wounds and manage postoperative bleeding for many years. However, pressure dressings may increase the incidence of postoperative complications, such as urinary retention, medical adhesive-related skin injury, and pain. A previous controlled trial included 67 patients who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. The data indicated that the use of a nonpressure dressing after hemorrhoidectomy reduces the incidence of urinary retention and catheterization. However, the incidence of severe postoperative bleeding and other postoperative complications was not assessed. There is no consensus on whether it is necessary and beneficial to use a nonpressure dressing after hemorrhoidectomy. The results of this randomized clinical study will help answer this question. METHODS: In this study, we plan to include 186 patients who have undergone modified Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, which only sutured external hemorrhoids to reduce the risk of bleeding. The purpose is to determine whether the use of nonpressure dressings after open hemorrhoidectomy is inferior to the use of pressure dressings in terms of severe postoperative bleeding and postoperative complications. The primary endpoints of the trial are the incidence of urinary retention within 24 h after surgery and the incidence of severe postoperative bleeding 1 h after dressing removal, which requires revision surgery within 24 h after the surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study are the pain score, anal distension score, postoperative use of analgesics, and incidence of medical adhesive-related skin injury, all of which will be assessed before removing the dressings. The length of hospitalization in days and hospitalization expenses will be recorded. Safety will be assessed with consideration of all adverse and severe adverse events related to the study treatment. DISCUSSION: The study received full ethics committee approval. The first patient was enrolled on 27 November 2020. The results of this trial will finally answer the question of whether a nonpressure dressing after open hemorrhoidectomy is necessary and beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000040283. Registered on 28 November 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8590300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85903002021-11-15 Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Xue, Ping Wu, Jing Zhu, Ping Wang, Dan Xu, Mei Zhang, Yi Lu, Guanmao Chen, Quanyi Zhang, Qin Tang, Renjin Fang, Jinbo Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pressure dressings have been used after open hemorrhoidectomy to protect surgical wounds and manage postoperative bleeding for many years. However, pressure dressings may increase the incidence of postoperative complications, such as urinary retention, medical adhesive-related skin injury, and pain. A previous controlled trial included 67 patients who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. The data indicated that the use of a nonpressure dressing after hemorrhoidectomy reduces the incidence of urinary retention and catheterization. However, the incidence of severe postoperative bleeding and other postoperative complications was not assessed. There is no consensus on whether it is necessary and beneficial to use a nonpressure dressing after hemorrhoidectomy. The results of this randomized clinical study will help answer this question. METHODS: In this study, we plan to include 186 patients who have undergone modified Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, which only sutured external hemorrhoids to reduce the risk of bleeding. The purpose is to determine whether the use of nonpressure dressings after open hemorrhoidectomy is inferior to the use of pressure dressings in terms of severe postoperative bleeding and postoperative complications. The primary endpoints of the trial are the incidence of urinary retention within 24 h after surgery and the incidence of severe postoperative bleeding 1 h after dressing removal, which requires revision surgery within 24 h after the surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study are the pain score, anal distension score, postoperative use of analgesics, and incidence of medical adhesive-related skin injury, all of which will be assessed before removing the dressings. The length of hospitalization in days and hospitalization expenses will be recorded. Safety will be assessed with consideration of all adverse and severe adverse events related to the study treatment. DISCUSSION: The study received full ethics committee approval. The first patient was enrolled on 27 November 2020. The results of this trial will finally answer the question of whether a nonpressure dressing after open hemorrhoidectomy is necessary and beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000040283. Registered on 28 November 2020. BioMed Central 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8590300/ /pubmed/34774091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05750-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Xue, Ping Wu, Jing Zhu, Ping Wang, Dan Xu, Mei Zhang, Yi Lu, Guanmao Chen, Quanyi Zhang, Qin Tang, Renjin Fang, Jinbo Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | pressure dressings versus nonpressure dressings after hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34774091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05750-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xueping pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wujing pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhuping pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangdan pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xumei pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangyi pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luguanmao pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenquanyi pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhangqin pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tangrenjin pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fangjinbo pressuredressingsversusnonpressuredressingsafterhemorrhoidectomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |