Cargando…

Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes

BACKGROUND: Modic changes (MC) are generally considered to be related to degenerative disc disease, and there is no uniform standard for surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) accompanied by Modic type I changes (MC I). The purpose of this study was to observe the clinical results of perc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Pengfei, Yang, Fengkai, Tong, Yuexin, Chen, Ying, Song, Youxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34785948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S338342
_version_ 1784598992249683968
author Li, Pengfei
Yang, Fengkai
Tong, Yuexin
Chen, Ying
Song, Youxin
author_facet Li, Pengfei
Yang, Fengkai
Tong, Yuexin
Chen, Ying
Song, Youxin
author_sort Li, Pengfei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modic changes (MC) are generally considered to be related to degenerative disc disease, and there is no uniform standard for surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) accompanied by Modic type I changes (MC I). The purpose of this study was to observe the clinical results of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treatment of LDH accompanied by MC I. METHODS: Of the 53 consecutive patients included, 29 underwent PTED and 24 underwent TLIF. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. Preoperative demographic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess clinical results. RESULTS: The mean age was 53.7±9.2 years in the PTED group and 53.6±9.6 years in the TLIF group. The scores of VAS legs, VAS back and ODI in the two groups after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Notably, the VAS back pain score and ODI in the PTED group showed an increasing trend with time. And the VAS back pain scores and ODI of the two groups were statistically different at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively (P<0.05). In addition, compared with the TLIF group, the PTED group showed less operation time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). At the final follow-up, the excellent rates were 91.7% and 86.2% in the fusion and PTED groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both PTED and TLIF procedures significantly improved the clinical symptoms of single-level LDH patients with MC I. Compared with TLIF, MC I may affect the improvement of low back pain and functional status after PTED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8590533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85905332021-11-15 Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes Li, Pengfei Yang, Fengkai Tong, Yuexin Chen, Ying Song, Youxin J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Modic changes (MC) are generally considered to be related to degenerative disc disease, and there is no uniform standard for surgical methods for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) accompanied by Modic type I changes (MC I). The purpose of this study was to observe the clinical results of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression (PTED) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for treatment of LDH accompanied by MC I. METHODS: Of the 53 consecutive patients included, 29 underwent PTED and 24 underwent TLIF. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. Preoperative demographic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess clinical results. RESULTS: The mean age was 53.7±9.2 years in the PTED group and 53.6±9.6 years in the TLIF group. The scores of VAS legs, VAS back and ODI in the two groups after operation were significantly improved compared with those before operation (P<0.05). Notably, the VAS back pain score and ODI in the PTED group showed an increasing trend with time. And the VAS back pain scores and ODI of the two groups were statistically different at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively (P<0.05). In addition, compared with the TLIF group, the PTED group showed less operation time, blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05). At the final follow-up, the excellent rates were 91.7% and 86.2% in the fusion and PTED groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both PTED and TLIF procedures significantly improved the clinical symptoms of single-level LDH patients with MC I. Compared with TLIF, MC I may affect the improvement of low back pain and functional status after PTED. Dove 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8590533/ /pubmed/34785948 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S338342 Text en © 2021 Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Pengfei
Yang, Fengkai
Tong, Yuexin
Chen, Ying
Song, Youxin
Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes
title Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes
title_full Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes
title_fullStr Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes
title_short Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Changes
title_sort comparison of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation with modic type i changes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34785948
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S338342
work_keys_str_mv AT lipengfei comparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentofsinglelevellumbardischerniationwithmodictypeichanges
AT yangfengkai comparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentofsinglelevellumbardischerniationwithmodictypeichanges
AT tongyuexin comparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentofsinglelevellumbardischerniationwithmodictypeichanges
AT chenying comparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentofsinglelevellumbardischerniationwithmodictypeichanges
AT songyouxin comparisonofpercutaneoustransforaminalendoscopicdecompressionandtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninthetreatmentofsinglelevellumbardischerniationwithmodictypeichanges