Cargando…
How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence
The “no dose is safe” linear no-threshold (LNT) model forms the basis for radiation safety in radiology practice. This model has its origins in observations of germline mutations in fruit flies exposed to X-rays. After World War II, quantitative risk estimates of radiation injury are primarily deriv...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735927 |
_version_ | 1784598996793163776 |
---|---|
author | Moorthy, Srikanth |
author_facet | Moorthy, Srikanth |
author_sort | Moorthy, Srikanth |
collection | PubMed |
description | The “no dose is safe” linear no-threshold (LNT) model forms the basis for radiation safety in radiology practice. This model has its origins in observations of germline mutations in fruit flies exposed to X-rays. After World War II, quantitative risk estimates of radiation injury are primarily derived from the atomic bomb survivor Life Span Study. Current understanding of tissue response to radiation has raised doubts about the validity of LNT model at low doses encountered in the practice of diagnostic radiology. This article traces the evolution of basic radiation safety concepts and provides a bird's eye view of the Life Span Study and other studies which throw light on the matter. The arguments for an alternative, threshold, or even hermetic models of dose response are examined. The relevance of these developments to the nuclear power industry is also outlined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8590548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85905482021-11-16 How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence Moorthy, Srikanth Indian J Radiol Imaging The “no dose is safe” linear no-threshold (LNT) model forms the basis for radiation safety in radiology practice. This model has its origins in observations of germline mutations in fruit flies exposed to X-rays. After World War II, quantitative risk estimates of radiation injury are primarily derived from the atomic bomb survivor Life Span Study. Current understanding of tissue response to radiation has raised doubts about the validity of LNT model at low doses encountered in the practice of diagnostic radiology. This article traces the evolution of basic radiation safety concepts and provides a bird's eye view of the Life Span Study and other studies which throw light on the matter. The arguments for an alternative, threshold, or even hermetic models of dose response are examined. The relevance of these developments to the nuclear power industry is also outlined. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2021-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8590548/ /pubmed/34790311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735927 Text en Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Moorthy, Srikanth How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence |
title | How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence |
title_full | How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence |
title_fullStr | How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence |
title_short | How Safe Are Radiation Doses in Diagnostic Radiology? A Historical Perspective and Review of Current Evidence |
title_sort | how safe are radiation doses in diagnostic radiology? a historical perspective and review of current evidence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moorthysrikanth howsafeareradiationdosesindiagnosticradiologyahistoricalperspectiveandreviewofcurrentevidence |