Cargando…

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) is often poorly tolerated, ineffective, or contraindicated. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) offers an alternative, although its impact on previously PAP-treated patients with CSA has not been examined....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwartz, Alan R., Goldberg, Lee R., McKane, Scott, Morgenthaler, Timothy I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x
_version_ 1784599033013075968
author Schwartz, Alan R.
Goldberg, Lee R.
McKane, Scott
Morgenthaler, Timothy I.
author_facet Schwartz, Alan R.
Goldberg, Lee R.
McKane, Scott
Morgenthaler, Timothy I.
author_sort Schwartz, Alan R.
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) is often poorly tolerated, ineffective, or contraindicated. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) offers an alternative, although its impact on previously PAP-treated patients with CSA has not been examined. METHODS: TPNS responses among PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated patients from the remedē(®) System Pivotal Trial were assessed. Of 151, 56 (37%) used PAP therapy before enrolling in the trial. Patients were implanted with a TPNS device and randomized to either active or deferred (control) therapy for 6 months before therapy activation. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months following active therapy. RESULTS: Patients had moderate-severe CSA at baseline, which was of greater severity and more symptomatic in the PAP-treated vs. PAP-naïve group (median AHI 52/h vs. 38, central apnea index (CAI) 32/h vs. 18, Epworth Sleepiness Scale 13 vs. 10, fatigue severity scale 5.2 vs. 4.5). Twelve months of TPNS decreased AHI to <20/h and CAI to ≤2/h. Both groups showed reductions in daytime sleepiness and fatigue, improved well-being by patient global assessment, and high therapeutic acceptance with 98% and 94% of PAP-treated and PAP-naïve patients indicating they would undergo the implant again. Stimulation produced discomfort in approximately one-third of patients, yet <5% of prior PAP-treated participants discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Polysomnographic and clinical responses to TPNS were comparable in PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated CSA patients. TPNS is a viable therapy across a broad spectrum of CSA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01816776; March 22, 2013 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8590675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85906752021-11-23 Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment Schwartz, Alan R. Goldberg, Lee R. McKane, Scott Morgenthaler, Timothy I. Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article STUDY OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) is often poorly tolerated, ineffective, or contraindicated. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) offers an alternative, although its impact on previously PAP-treated patients with CSA has not been examined. METHODS: TPNS responses among PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated patients from the remedē(®) System Pivotal Trial were assessed. Of 151, 56 (37%) used PAP therapy before enrolling in the trial. Patients were implanted with a TPNS device and randomized to either active or deferred (control) therapy for 6 months before therapy activation. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months following active therapy. RESULTS: Patients had moderate-severe CSA at baseline, which was of greater severity and more symptomatic in the PAP-treated vs. PAP-naïve group (median AHI 52/h vs. 38, central apnea index (CAI) 32/h vs. 18, Epworth Sleepiness Scale 13 vs. 10, fatigue severity scale 5.2 vs. 4.5). Twelve months of TPNS decreased AHI to <20/h and CAI to ≤2/h. Both groups showed reductions in daytime sleepiness and fatigue, improved well-being by patient global assessment, and high therapeutic acceptance with 98% and 94% of PAP-treated and PAP-naïve patients indicating they would undergo the implant again. Stimulation produced discomfort in approximately one-third of patients, yet <5% of prior PAP-treated participants discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Polysomnographic and clinical responses to TPNS were comparable in PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated CSA patients. TPNS is a viable therapy across a broad spectrum of CSA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01816776; March 22, 2013 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8590675/ /pubmed/33745107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
Schwartz, Alan R.
Goldberg, Lee R.
McKane, Scott
Morgenthaler, Timothy I.
Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
title Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
title_full Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
title_fullStr Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
title_full_unstemmed Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
title_short Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
title_sort transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
topic Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x
work_keys_str_mv AT schwartzalanr transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment
AT goldbergleer transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment
AT mckanescott transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment
AT morgenthalertimothyi transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment