Cargando…
Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) is often poorly tolerated, ineffective, or contraindicated. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) offers an alternative, although its impact on previously PAP-treated patients with CSA has not been examined....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x |
_version_ | 1784599033013075968 |
---|---|
author | Schwartz, Alan R. Goldberg, Lee R. McKane, Scott Morgenthaler, Timothy I. |
author_facet | Schwartz, Alan R. Goldberg, Lee R. McKane, Scott Morgenthaler, Timothy I. |
author_sort | Schwartz, Alan R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) is often poorly tolerated, ineffective, or contraindicated. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) offers an alternative, although its impact on previously PAP-treated patients with CSA has not been examined. METHODS: TPNS responses among PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated patients from the remedē(®) System Pivotal Trial were assessed. Of 151, 56 (37%) used PAP therapy before enrolling in the trial. Patients were implanted with a TPNS device and randomized to either active or deferred (control) therapy for 6 months before therapy activation. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months following active therapy. RESULTS: Patients had moderate-severe CSA at baseline, which was of greater severity and more symptomatic in the PAP-treated vs. PAP-naïve group (median AHI 52/h vs. 38, central apnea index (CAI) 32/h vs. 18, Epworth Sleepiness Scale 13 vs. 10, fatigue severity scale 5.2 vs. 4.5). Twelve months of TPNS decreased AHI to <20/h and CAI to ≤2/h. Both groups showed reductions in daytime sleepiness and fatigue, improved well-being by patient global assessment, and high therapeutic acceptance with 98% and 94% of PAP-treated and PAP-naïve patients indicating they would undergo the implant again. Stimulation produced discomfort in approximately one-third of patients, yet <5% of prior PAP-treated participants discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Polysomnographic and clinical responses to TPNS were comparable in PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated CSA patients. TPNS is a viable therapy across a broad spectrum of CSA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01816776; March 22, 2013 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8590675 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85906752021-11-23 Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment Schwartz, Alan R. Goldberg, Lee R. McKane, Scott Morgenthaler, Timothy I. Sleep Breath Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article STUDY OBJECTIVE: Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) is often poorly tolerated, ineffective, or contraindicated. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) offers an alternative, although its impact on previously PAP-treated patients with CSA has not been examined. METHODS: TPNS responses among PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated patients from the remedē(®) System Pivotal Trial were assessed. Of 151, 56 (37%) used PAP therapy before enrolling in the trial. Patients were implanted with a TPNS device and randomized to either active or deferred (control) therapy for 6 months before therapy activation. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed at baseline, and 6 and 12 months following active therapy. RESULTS: Patients had moderate-severe CSA at baseline, which was of greater severity and more symptomatic in the PAP-treated vs. PAP-naïve group (median AHI 52/h vs. 38, central apnea index (CAI) 32/h vs. 18, Epworth Sleepiness Scale 13 vs. 10, fatigue severity scale 5.2 vs. 4.5). Twelve months of TPNS decreased AHI to <20/h and CAI to ≤2/h. Both groups showed reductions in daytime sleepiness and fatigue, improved well-being by patient global assessment, and high therapeutic acceptance with 98% and 94% of PAP-treated and PAP-naïve patients indicating they would undergo the implant again. Stimulation produced discomfort in approximately one-third of patients, yet <5% of prior PAP-treated participants discontinued therapy. CONCLUSION: Polysomnographic and clinical responses to TPNS were comparable in PAP-naïve and prior PAP-treated CSA patients. TPNS is a viable therapy across a broad spectrum of CSA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01816776; March 22, 2013 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8590675/ /pubmed/33745107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article Schwartz, Alan R. Goldberg, Lee R. McKane, Scott Morgenthaler, Timothy I. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment |
title | Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment |
title_full | Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment |
title_fullStr | Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment |
title_short | Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment |
title_sort | transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves central sleep apnea, sleep quality, and quality of life regardless of prior positive airway pressure treatment |
topic | Sleep Breathing Physiology and Disorders • Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8590675/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33745107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-021-02335-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwartzalanr transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment AT goldbergleer transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment AT mckanescott transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment AT morgenthalertimothyi transvenousphrenicnervestimulationimprovescentralsleepapneasleepqualityandqualityofliferegardlessofpriorpositiveairwaypressuretreatment |