Cargando…
The limiting factors and regulatory processes that control the environmental responses of C(3), C(3)–C(4) intermediate, and C(4) photosynthesis
Here, we describe a model of C(3), C(3)–C(4) intermediate, and C(4) photosynthesis that is designed to facilitate quantitative analysis of physiological measurements. The model relates the factors limiting electron transport and carbon metabolism, the regulatory processes that coordinate these metab...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34714387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05062-y |
Sumario: | Here, we describe a model of C(3), C(3)–C(4) intermediate, and C(4) photosynthesis that is designed to facilitate quantitative analysis of physiological measurements. The model relates the factors limiting electron transport and carbon metabolism, the regulatory processes that coordinate these metabolic domains, and the responses to light, carbon dioxide, and temperature. It has three unique features. First, mechanistic expressions describe how the cytochrome b(6)f complex controls electron transport in mesophyll and bundle sheath chloroplasts. Second, the coupling between the mesophyll and bundle sheath expressions represents how feedback regulation of Cyt b(6)f coordinates electron transport and carbon metabolism. Third, the temperature sensitivity of Cyt b(6)f is differentiated from that of the coupling between NADPH, Fd, and ATP production. Using this model, we present simulations demonstrating that the light dependence of the carbon dioxide compensation point in C(3)–C(4) leaves can be explained by co-occurrence of light saturation in the mesophyll and light limitation in the bundle sheath. We also present inversions demonstrating that population-level variation in the carbon dioxide compensation point in a Type I C(3)–C(4) plant, Flaveria chloraefolia, can be explained by variable allocation of photosynthetic capacity to the bundle sheath. These results suggest that Type I C(3)–C(4) intermediate plants adjust pigment and protein distributions to optimize the glycine shuttle under different light and temperature regimes, and that the malate and aspartate shuttles may have originally functioned to smooth out the energy supply and demand associated with the glycine shuttle. This model has a wide range of potential applications to physiological, ecological, and evolutionary questions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-021-05062-y. |
---|