Cargando…
Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study
AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus relevant comparators for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours located in the gastrointestinal tract (GI-NETs) and the pancreas (P-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to perform...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2021.06.003 |
_version_ | 1784599169545011200 |
---|---|
author | Glover, Matthew Caplin, Martyn Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R. Longworth, Louise |
author_facet | Glover, Matthew Caplin, Martyn Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R. Longworth, Louise |
author_sort | Glover, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus relevant comparators for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours located in the gastrointestinal tract (GI-NETs) and the pancreas (P-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to perform a cost-utility analysis of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus standard of care (high dose Octreotide LAR), everolimus and sunitinib. Effectiveness data for SoC, everolimus and sunitinib were obtained from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Given a lack of head-to-head effectiveness data, matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were performed to population-adjust [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE survival data based on prognostic factors and derive estimates of relative effectiveness. Health state utilities were estimated from real-world evidence. Drug acquisition costs were taken from nationally published sources (BNF, NICE), and administration costs were based on treatment protocols in [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE studies, combined with nationally published unit costs (PSSRU, DoH reference costs). Incidence of adverse events were estimated using published sources. A discount rate of 3.5% was applied to both utilities and costs, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Costs were included from an NHS perspective and presented in 2017/18 GBP (and PPP Euros for base case). RESULTS: In GI-NETs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE compared to SoC and everolimus was £26,528 (€27,672) and £24,145 (€25,186) per QALY, respectively. In P-NETs, the ICER of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE compared to SoC was £22,146 (€23,101) or £28,038 (€29,251) dependent on matched population, and £21,827 (€22,766) and £15,768 (€16,445) compared to everolimus and sunitinib, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000, [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for GI-NET and P-NET patients versus relevant treatment comparators (NHS perspective). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8591195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85911952021-12-14 Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study Glover, Matthew Caplin, Martyn Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R. Longworth, Louise EJC Suppl Article AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus relevant comparators for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumours located in the gastrointestinal tract (GI-NETs) and the pancreas (P-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to perform a cost-utility analysis of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE versus standard of care (high dose Octreotide LAR), everolimus and sunitinib. Effectiveness data for SoC, everolimus and sunitinib were obtained from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Given a lack of head-to-head effectiveness data, matching adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were performed to population-adjust [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE survival data based on prognostic factors and derive estimates of relative effectiveness. Health state utilities were estimated from real-world evidence. Drug acquisition costs were taken from nationally published sources (BNF, NICE), and administration costs were based on treatment protocols in [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE studies, combined with nationally published unit costs (PSSRU, DoH reference costs). Incidence of adverse events were estimated using published sources. A discount rate of 3.5% was applied to both utilities and costs, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Costs were included from an NHS perspective and presented in 2017/18 GBP (and PPP Euros for base case). RESULTS: In GI-NETs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE compared to SoC and everolimus was £26,528 (€27,672) and £24,145 (€25,186) per QALY, respectively. In P-NETs, the ICER of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE compared to SoC was £22,146 (€23,101) or £28,038 (€29,251) dependent on matched population, and £21,827 (€22,766) and £15,768 (€16,445) compared to everolimus and sunitinib, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000, [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option for GI-NET and P-NET patients versus relevant treatment comparators (NHS perspective). Elsevier 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8591195/ /pubmed/34912479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2021.06.003 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Glover, Matthew Caplin, Martyn Leeuwenkamp, Oscar R. Longworth, Louise Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study |
title | Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study |
title_full | Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study |
title_fullStr | Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study |
title_short | Use of [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: Results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study |
title_sort | use of [(177)lu]lu-dota-tate in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: results of a uk cost-effectiveness modelling study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2021.06.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT glovermatthew useof177luludotatateinthetreatmentofgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursresultsofaukcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT caplinmartyn useof177luludotatateinthetreatmentofgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursresultsofaukcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT leeuwenkamposcarr useof177luludotatateinthetreatmentofgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursresultsofaukcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy AT longworthlouise useof177luludotatateinthetreatmentofgastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumoursresultsofaukcosteffectivenessmodellingstudy |