Cargando…

Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm

Introduction: Children with early brain damage or dysfunction are at risk of developing cerebral visual impairment (CVI), including visual processing dysfunctions (VPD), which currently remain largely undetected until school age. Our aim was to systematically screen for possible VPD in children born...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kooiker, Marlou J. G., van Gils, Maud M., van der Zee, Ymie J., Swarte, Renate M. C., Smit, Liesbeth S., Loudon, Sjoukje, van der Steen, Sanny, Reiss, Irwin K. M., Pel, Johan J. M., van der Steen, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.729080
_version_ 1784599188005191680
author Kooiker, Marlou J. G.
van Gils, Maud M.
van der Zee, Ymie J.
Swarte, Renate M. C.
Smit, Liesbeth S.
Loudon, Sjoukje
van der Steen, Sanny
Reiss, Irwin K. M.
Pel, Johan J. M.
van der Steen, Johannes
author_facet Kooiker, Marlou J. G.
van Gils, Maud M.
van der Zee, Ymie J.
Swarte, Renate M. C.
Smit, Liesbeth S.
Loudon, Sjoukje
van der Steen, Sanny
Reiss, Irwin K. M.
Pel, Johan J. M.
van der Steen, Johannes
author_sort Kooiker, Marlou J. G.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Children with early brain damage or dysfunction are at risk of developing cerebral visual impairment (CVI), including visual processing dysfunctions (VPD), which currently remain largely undetected until school age. Our aim was to systematically screen for possible VPD in children born very or extremely preterm from 1 to 2 years corrected age (CA) and to evaluate the effectiveness of early referral. Method: We included N = 48 children born < 30 weeks from 1 year CA. They underwent a two-step VPD screening based on (1) neurological signs indicative of visual brain damage evaluated by neonatologists and/or pediatric neurologist and (2) a functional assessment of visual orienting functions (VOF) with an eye tracking-based test. If at least one of these assessments was abnormal for their age, the children were classified as a risk of VPD and referred to undergo conventional visual diagnostics: ophthalmic exam and visual function assessment (VFA). At 2 years CA, VOF screening was repeated and neurodevelopment was assessed. Results: 18 children (38%) were classified as at risk of VPD at 1 year CA. 7 children had abnormal neurological signs, 5 children had abnormal VOF, and 6 children had both. Subsequent ophthalmic exams (N = 14) showed severe hypermetropia in 21% and strabismus in 14%. VFA (N = 10) showed abnormal visual function and behavior in only 1 child. At 2 years CA, the total group showed an increase in abnormal VOF. Whereas the children at risk showed some normalization, the group without VPD risk at 1 year CA showed deterioration of VOF. Neurodevelopmental outcome did not clearly differ between risk groups. Conclusion: Our findings show a substantial risk of VPD during visual screening (in 38%) at 1 year CA, but relatively few deficits on subsequent conventional ophthalmic exams and VFA. The data suggest that most conventional visual diagnostic methods at this young age are not related to the established VPD risks. VOF assessment should be used complimentary to these methods. The fact that at 2 years CA the number of children with a VPD risk based on abnormal VOF increased argues for more extensive and continuous screening in risk groups, at least until school age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8591256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85912562021-11-16 Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm Kooiker, Marlou J. G. van Gils, Maud M. van der Zee, Ymie J. Swarte, Renate M. C. Smit, Liesbeth S. Loudon, Sjoukje van der Steen, Sanny Reiss, Irwin K. M. Pel, Johan J. M. van der Steen, Johannes Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Introduction: Children with early brain damage or dysfunction are at risk of developing cerebral visual impairment (CVI), including visual processing dysfunctions (VPD), which currently remain largely undetected until school age. Our aim was to systematically screen for possible VPD in children born very or extremely preterm from 1 to 2 years corrected age (CA) and to evaluate the effectiveness of early referral. Method: We included N = 48 children born < 30 weeks from 1 year CA. They underwent a two-step VPD screening based on (1) neurological signs indicative of visual brain damage evaluated by neonatologists and/or pediatric neurologist and (2) a functional assessment of visual orienting functions (VOF) with an eye tracking-based test. If at least one of these assessments was abnormal for their age, the children were classified as a risk of VPD and referred to undergo conventional visual diagnostics: ophthalmic exam and visual function assessment (VFA). At 2 years CA, VOF screening was repeated and neurodevelopment was assessed. Results: 18 children (38%) were classified as at risk of VPD at 1 year CA. 7 children had abnormal neurological signs, 5 children had abnormal VOF, and 6 children had both. Subsequent ophthalmic exams (N = 14) showed severe hypermetropia in 21% and strabismus in 14%. VFA (N = 10) showed abnormal visual function and behavior in only 1 child. At 2 years CA, the total group showed an increase in abnormal VOF. Whereas the children at risk showed some normalization, the group without VPD risk at 1 year CA showed deterioration of VOF. Neurodevelopmental outcome did not clearly differ between risk groups. Conclusion: Our findings show a substantial risk of VPD during visual screening (in 38%) at 1 year CA, but relatively few deficits on subsequent conventional ophthalmic exams and VFA. The data suggest that most conventional visual diagnostic methods at this young age are not related to the established VPD risks. VOF assessment should be used complimentary to these methods. The fact that at 2 years CA the number of children with a VPD risk based on abnormal VOF increased argues for more extensive and continuous screening in risk groups, at least until school age. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8591256/ /pubmed/34790105 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.729080 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kooiker, van Gils, van der Zee, Swarte, Smit, Loudon, van der Steen, Reiss, Pel and van der Steen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kooiker, Marlou J. G.
van Gils, Maud M.
van der Zee, Ymie J.
Swarte, Renate M. C.
Smit, Liesbeth S.
Loudon, Sjoukje
van der Steen, Sanny
Reiss, Irwin K. M.
Pel, Johan J. M.
van der Steen, Johannes
Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm
title Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm
title_full Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm
title_fullStr Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm
title_full_unstemmed Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm
title_short Early Screening of Visual Processing Dysfunctions in Children Born Very or Extremely Preterm
title_sort early screening of visual processing dysfunctions in children born very or extremely preterm
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790105
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.729080
work_keys_str_mv AT kooikermarloujg earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT vangilsmaudm earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT vanderzeeymiej earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT swarterenatemc earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT smitliesbeths earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT loudonsjoukje earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT vandersteensanny earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT reissirwinkm earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT peljohanjm earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm
AT vandersteenjohannes earlyscreeningofvisualprocessingdysfunctionsinchildrenbornveryorextremelypreterm