Cargando…

Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter

Laughter is a ubiquitous social signal. Recent work has highlighted distinctions between spontaneous and volitional laughter, which differ in terms of both production mechanisms and perceptual features. Here, we test listeners' ability to infer group identity from volitional and spontaneous lau...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamiloğlu, Roza G., Tanaka, Akihiro, Scott, Sophie K., Sauter, Disa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0404
_version_ 1784599219996196864
author Kamiloğlu, Roza G.
Tanaka, Akihiro
Scott, Sophie K.
Sauter, Disa A.
author_facet Kamiloğlu, Roza G.
Tanaka, Akihiro
Scott, Sophie K.
Sauter, Disa A.
author_sort Kamiloğlu, Roza G.
collection PubMed
description Laughter is a ubiquitous social signal. Recent work has highlighted distinctions between spontaneous and volitional laughter, which differ in terms of both production mechanisms and perceptual features. Here, we test listeners' ability to infer group identity from volitional and spontaneous laughter, as well as the perceived positivity of these laughs across cultures. Dutch (n = 273) and Japanese (n = 131) participants listened to decontextualized laughter clips and judged (i) whether the laughing person was from their cultural in-group or an out-group; and (ii) whether they thought the laughter was produced spontaneously or volitionally. They also rated the positivity of each laughter clip. Using frequentist and Bayesian analyses, we show that listeners were able to infer group membership from both spontaneous and volitional laughter, and that performance was equivalent for both types of laughter. Spontaneous laughter was rated as more positive than volitional laughter across the two cultures, and in-group laughs were perceived as more positive than out-group laughs by Dutch but not Japanese listeners. Our results demonstrate that both spontaneous and volitional laughter can be used by listeners to infer laughers’ cultural group identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Voice modulation: from origin and mechanism to social impact (Part II)’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8591384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85913842021-12-07 Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter Kamiloğlu, Roza G. Tanaka, Akihiro Scott, Sophie K. Sauter, Disa A. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Laughter is a ubiquitous social signal. Recent work has highlighted distinctions between spontaneous and volitional laughter, which differ in terms of both production mechanisms and perceptual features. Here, we test listeners' ability to infer group identity from volitional and spontaneous laughter, as well as the perceived positivity of these laughs across cultures. Dutch (n = 273) and Japanese (n = 131) participants listened to decontextualized laughter clips and judged (i) whether the laughing person was from their cultural in-group or an out-group; and (ii) whether they thought the laughter was produced spontaneously or volitionally. They also rated the positivity of each laughter clip. Using frequentist and Bayesian analyses, we show that listeners were able to infer group membership from both spontaneous and volitional laughter, and that performance was equivalent for both types of laughter. Spontaneous laughter was rated as more positive than volitional laughter across the two cultures, and in-group laughs were perceived as more positive than out-group laughs by Dutch but not Japanese listeners. Our results demonstrate that both spontaneous and volitional laughter can be used by listeners to infer laughers’ cultural group identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Voice modulation: from origin and mechanism to social impact (Part II)’. The Royal Society 2022-01-03 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8591384/ /pubmed/34775822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0404 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Kamiloğlu, Roza G.
Tanaka, Akihiro
Scott, Sophie K.
Sauter, Disa A.
Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
title Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
title_full Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
title_fullStr Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
title_full_unstemmed Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
title_short Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
title_sort perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0404
work_keys_str_mv AT kamiloglurozag perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter
AT tanakaakihiro perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter
AT scottsophiek perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter
AT sauterdisaa perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter