Cargando…
Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter
Laughter is a ubiquitous social signal. Recent work has highlighted distinctions between spontaneous and volitional laughter, which differ in terms of both production mechanisms and perceptual features. Here, we test listeners' ability to infer group identity from volitional and spontaneous lau...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0404 |
_version_ | 1784599219996196864 |
---|---|
author | Kamiloğlu, Roza G. Tanaka, Akihiro Scott, Sophie K. Sauter, Disa A. |
author_facet | Kamiloğlu, Roza G. Tanaka, Akihiro Scott, Sophie K. Sauter, Disa A. |
author_sort | Kamiloğlu, Roza G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laughter is a ubiquitous social signal. Recent work has highlighted distinctions between spontaneous and volitional laughter, which differ in terms of both production mechanisms and perceptual features. Here, we test listeners' ability to infer group identity from volitional and spontaneous laughter, as well as the perceived positivity of these laughs across cultures. Dutch (n = 273) and Japanese (n = 131) participants listened to decontextualized laughter clips and judged (i) whether the laughing person was from their cultural in-group or an out-group; and (ii) whether they thought the laughter was produced spontaneously or volitionally. They also rated the positivity of each laughter clip. Using frequentist and Bayesian analyses, we show that listeners were able to infer group membership from both spontaneous and volitional laughter, and that performance was equivalent for both types of laughter. Spontaneous laughter was rated as more positive than volitional laughter across the two cultures, and in-group laughs were perceived as more positive than out-group laughs by Dutch but not Japanese listeners. Our results demonstrate that both spontaneous and volitional laughter can be used by listeners to infer laughers’ cultural group identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Voice modulation: from origin and mechanism to social impact (Part II)’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8591384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85913842021-12-07 Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter Kamiloğlu, Roza G. Tanaka, Akihiro Scott, Sophie K. Sauter, Disa A. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Laughter is a ubiquitous social signal. Recent work has highlighted distinctions between spontaneous and volitional laughter, which differ in terms of both production mechanisms and perceptual features. Here, we test listeners' ability to infer group identity from volitional and spontaneous laughter, as well as the perceived positivity of these laughs across cultures. Dutch (n = 273) and Japanese (n = 131) participants listened to decontextualized laughter clips and judged (i) whether the laughing person was from their cultural in-group or an out-group; and (ii) whether they thought the laughter was produced spontaneously or volitionally. They also rated the positivity of each laughter clip. Using frequentist and Bayesian analyses, we show that listeners were able to infer group membership from both spontaneous and volitional laughter, and that performance was equivalent for both types of laughter. Spontaneous laughter was rated as more positive than volitional laughter across the two cultures, and in-group laughs were perceived as more positive than out-group laughs by Dutch but not Japanese listeners. Our results demonstrate that both spontaneous and volitional laughter can be used by listeners to infer laughers’ cultural group identity. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Voice modulation: from origin and mechanism to social impact (Part II)’. The Royal Society 2022-01-03 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8591384/ /pubmed/34775822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0404 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Kamiloğlu, Roza G. Tanaka, Akihiro Scott, Sophie K. Sauter, Disa A. Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter |
title | Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter |
title_full | Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter |
title_fullStr | Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter |
title_full_unstemmed | Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter |
title_short | Perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter |
title_sort | perception of group membership from spontaneous and volitional laughter |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0404 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamiloglurozag perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter AT tanakaakihiro perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter AT scottsophiek perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter AT sauterdisaa perceptionofgroupmembershipfromspontaneousandvolitionallaughter |