Cargando…

Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep

Targeted memory reactivation (TMR) has recently emerged as a promising tool to manipulate and study the sleeping brain. Although the technique is developing rapidly, only a few studies have examined how the effects of TMR develop over time. Here, we use a bimanual serial reaction time task (SRTT) to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rakowska, Martyna, Abdellahi, Mahmoud E.A., Bagrowska, Paulina, Navarrete, Miguel, Lewis, Penelope A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118573
_version_ 1784599226242564096
author Rakowska, Martyna
Abdellahi, Mahmoud E.A.
Bagrowska, Paulina
Navarrete, Miguel
Lewis, Penelope A.
author_facet Rakowska, Martyna
Abdellahi, Mahmoud E.A.
Bagrowska, Paulina
Navarrete, Miguel
Lewis, Penelope A.
author_sort Rakowska, Martyna
collection PubMed
description Targeted memory reactivation (TMR) has recently emerged as a promising tool to manipulate and study the sleeping brain. Although the technique is developing rapidly, only a few studies have examined how the effects of TMR develop over time. Here, we use a bimanual serial reaction time task (SRTT) to investigate whether the difference between the cued and un-cued sequence of button presses persists long-term. We further explore the relationship between the TMR benefit and sleep spindles, as well as their coupling with slow oscillations. Our behavioural analysis shows better performance for the dominant hand. Importantly, there was a strong effect of TMR, with improved performance on the cued sequence after sleep. Closer examination revealed a significant benefit of TMR at 10 days post-encoding, but not 24 h or 6 weeks post-encoding. Time spent in stage 2, but not stage 3, of NREM sleep predicted cueing benefit. We also found a significant increase in spindle density and SO-spindle coupling during the cue period, when compared to the no-cue period. Together, our results demonstrate that TMR effects evolve over several weeks post-cueing, as well as emphasising the importance of stage 2, spindles and the SO-spindle coupling in procedural memory consolidation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8591408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85914082021-12-01 Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep Rakowska, Martyna Abdellahi, Mahmoud E.A. Bagrowska, Paulina Navarrete, Miguel Lewis, Penelope A. Neuroimage Article Targeted memory reactivation (TMR) has recently emerged as a promising tool to manipulate and study the sleeping brain. Although the technique is developing rapidly, only a few studies have examined how the effects of TMR develop over time. Here, we use a bimanual serial reaction time task (SRTT) to investigate whether the difference between the cued and un-cued sequence of button presses persists long-term. We further explore the relationship between the TMR benefit and sleep spindles, as well as their coupling with slow oscillations. Our behavioural analysis shows better performance for the dominant hand. Importantly, there was a strong effect of TMR, with improved performance on the cued sequence after sleep. Closer examination revealed a significant benefit of TMR at 10 days post-encoding, but not 24 h or 6 weeks post-encoding. Time spent in stage 2, but not stage 3, of NREM sleep predicted cueing benefit. We also found a significant increase in spindle density and SO-spindle coupling during the cue period, when compared to the no-cue period. Together, our results demonstrate that TMR effects evolve over several weeks post-cueing, as well as emphasising the importance of stage 2, spindles and the SO-spindle coupling in procedural memory consolidation. Academic Press 2021-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8591408/ /pubmed/34537384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118573 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rakowska, Martyna
Abdellahi, Mahmoud E.A.
Bagrowska, Paulina
Navarrete, Miguel
Lewis, Penelope A.
Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep
title Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep
title_full Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep
title_fullStr Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep
title_full_unstemmed Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep
title_short Long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during NREM sleep
title_sort long term effects of cueing procedural memory reactivation during nrem sleep
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118573
work_keys_str_mv AT rakowskamartyna longtermeffectsofcueingproceduralmemoryreactivationduringnremsleep
AT abdellahimahmoudea longtermeffectsofcueingproceduralmemoryreactivationduringnremsleep
AT bagrowskapaulina longtermeffectsofcueingproceduralmemoryreactivationduringnremsleep
AT navarretemiguel longtermeffectsofcueingproceduralmemoryreactivationduringnremsleep
AT lewispenelopea longtermeffectsofcueingproceduralmemoryreactivationduringnremsleep