Cargando…
Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Gas embolism induced by CO(2) pneumoperitoneum is commonly identified as a risk factor for morbidity, especially cardiopulmonary morbidity, after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in adults. Increasing pneumoperitoneum pressure (PP) contributes to gas accumulation following laparoscopy....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34781988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05678-8 |
_version_ | 1784599234483322880 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Danfeng Liu, Mingyue Huang, Jian Xu, Yongfeng Liu, Luping Miao, Changhong Zhong, Jing |
author_facet | Jin, Danfeng Liu, Mingyue Huang, Jian Xu, Yongfeng Liu, Luping Miao, Changhong Zhong, Jing |
author_sort | Jin, Danfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gas embolism induced by CO(2) pneumoperitoneum is commonly identified as a risk factor for morbidity, especially cardiopulmonary morbidity, after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in adults. Increasing pneumoperitoneum pressure (PP) contributes to gas accumulation following laparoscopy. However, few studies have examined the effects of PP in the context of LLR. In LLR, the PP-central venous pressure (CVP) gradient is increased due to hepatic vein rupture, hepatic sinusoid exposure, and low CVP management, which together increase the risk of CO(2) embolization. The aim of this study is to primarily determine the role of low PP (10 mmHg) on the incidence of severe gas embolism. METHODS: Adult participants (n = 140) undergoing elective LLR will be allocated to either a standard (15 mmHg) or low (10 mmHg) PP group. Anesthesia management, postoperative care, and other processes will be performed similarly in both groups. The occurrence of severe gas embolism, which is defined as gas embolism ≥ grade 3 according to the Schmandra microbubble method, will be detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and recorded as the primary outcome. The subjects will be followed up until discharge and followed up by telephone 1 and 3 months after surgery. Postoperative outcomes, such as the Post-Operative Quality of Recovery Scale, pain severity, and adverse events, will be assessed. Serum cardiac markers and inflammatory factors will also be assessed during the study period. The correlation between intraoperative inferior vena cava-collapsibility index (IVC-CI) under TEE and central venous pressure (CVP) will also be explored. DISCUSSION: This study is the first prospective randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of low versus standard PP on gas embolism using TEE during elective LLR. These findings will provide scientific and clinical evidence of the role of PP. TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version: version 1 of 21-08-2020 TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000036396 (http://www.chictr.org.cn). Registered on 22 August 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05678-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8591437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85914372021-11-15 Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Jin, Danfeng Liu, Mingyue Huang, Jian Xu, Yongfeng Liu, Luping Miao, Changhong Zhong, Jing Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Gas embolism induced by CO(2) pneumoperitoneum is commonly identified as a risk factor for morbidity, especially cardiopulmonary morbidity, after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in adults. Increasing pneumoperitoneum pressure (PP) contributes to gas accumulation following laparoscopy. However, few studies have examined the effects of PP in the context of LLR. In LLR, the PP-central venous pressure (CVP) gradient is increased due to hepatic vein rupture, hepatic sinusoid exposure, and low CVP management, which together increase the risk of CO(2) embolization. The aim of this study is to primarily determine the role of low PP (10 mmHg) on the incidence of severe gas embolism. METHODS: Adult participants (n = 140) undergoing elective LLR will be allocated to either a standard (15 mmHg) or low (10 mmHg) PP group. Anesthesia management, postoperative care, and other processes will be performed similarly in both groups. The occurrence of severe gas embolism, which is defined as gas embolism ≥ grade 3 according to the Schmandra microbubble method, will be detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and recorded as the primary outcome. The subjects will be followed up until discharge and followed up by telephone 1 and 3 months after surgery. Postoperative outcomes, such as the Post-Operative Quality of Recovery Scale, pain severity, and adverse events, will be assessed. Serum cardiac markers and inflammatory factors will also be assessed during the study period. The correlation between intraoperative inferior vena cava-collapsibility index (IVC-CI) under TEE and central venous pressure (CVP) will also be explored. DISCUSSION: This study is the first prospective randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of low versus standard PP on gas embolism using TEE during elective LLR. These findings will provide scientific and clinical evidence of the role of PP. TRIAL STATUS: Protocol version: version 1 of 21-08-2020 TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000036396 (http://www.chictr.org.cn). Registered on 22 August 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05678-8. BioMed Central 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8591437/ /pubmed/34781988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05678-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Jin, Danfeng Liu, Mingyue Huang, Jian Xu, Yongfeng Liu, Luping Miao, Changhong Zhong, Jing Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (GASES): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | gas embolism under standard versus low pneumoperitoneum pressure during laparoscopic liver resection (gases): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34781988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05678-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jindanfeng gasembolismunderstandardversuslowpneumoperitoneumpressureduringlaparoscopicliverresectiongasesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liumingyue gasembolismunderstandardversuslowpneumoperitoneumpressureduringlaparoscopicliverresectiongasesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangjian gasembolismunderstandardversuslowpneumoperitoneumpressureduringlaparoscopicliverresectiongasesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xuyongfeng gasembolismunderstandardversuslowpneumoperitoneumpressureduringlaparoscopicliverresectiongasesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liuluping gasembolismunderstandardversuslowpneumoperitoneumpressureduringlaparoscopicliverresectiongasesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT miaochanghong gasembolismunderstandardversuslowpneumoperitoneumpressureduringlaparoscopicliverresectiongasesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhongjing gasembolismunderstandardversuslowpneumoperitoneumpressureduringlaparoscopicliverresectiongasesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |