Cargando…
Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms
The human microbiome has begun to emerge as a potential forensic tool, with varied applications ranging from unique identification to investigative leads that link individuals and/or locations. The relative abundance of the combined DNA of the microbiome, compared to human nuclear DNA, may expand po...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1244 |
_version_ | 1784599237258903552 |
---|---|
author | Wise, Natalie M. Wagner, Sarah J. Worst, Travis J. Sprague, Jon E. Oechsle, Crystal M. |
author_facet | Wise, Natalie M. Wagner, Sarah J. Worst, Travis J. Sprague, Jon E. Oechsle, Crystal M. |
author_sort | Wise, Natalie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The human microbiome has begun to emerge as a potential forensic tool, with varied applications ranging from unique identification to investigative leads that link individuals and/or locations. The relative abundance of the combined DNA of the microbiome, compared to human nuclear DNA, may expand potential sources of biological evidence, especially in cases with transfer or low‐copy number DNA samples. This work sought to determine the optimal swab type for the collection and analysis of microorganisms. A bacterium (Proteus mirabilis) was deposited by pipette onto four swab types (cotton, flocked, dental applicators, and dissolvable), and extraction and real‐time PCR quantitation of the bacterial DNA were performed, which allowed for absolute microbial DNA recovery and comparison of yields across the four sampling substrates. Flocked swabs had the highest yield (~1240 ng) compared to the cotton swabs (~184 ng), dental applicators (~533 ng), and dissolvable swabs (~430 ng). The collection efficiency was further evaluated for cotton and flocked swabs using dried microbial samples spotted onto non‐porous surfaces (treated wood, glass, plastic, and tile). Flocked swabs performed consistently better across wood, glass, and tile, but showed decreased recovery from plastic. The cotton swabs failed in the recovery of P. mirabilis DNA across all surfaces. Knowing the appropriate sampling substrate will be useful as others continue to investigate the use of the microbiome as a forensics tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8591448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85914482021-11-22 Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms Wise, Natalie M. Wagner, Sarah J. Worst, Travis J. Sprague, Jon E. Oechsle, Crystal M. Microbiologyopen Commentary The human microbiome has begun to emerge as a potential forensic tool, with varied applications ranging from unique identification to investigative leads that link individuals and/or locations. The relative abundance of the combined DNA of the microbiome, compared to human nuclear DNA, may expand potential sources of biological evidence, especially in cases with transfer or low‐copy number DNA samples. This work sought to determine the optimal swab type for the collection and analysis of microorganisms. A bacterium (Proteus mirabilis) was deposited by pipette onto four swab types (cotton, flocked, dental applicators, and dissolvable), and extraction and real‐time PCR quantitation of the bacterial DNA were performed, which allowed for absolute microbial DNA recovery and comparison of yields across the four sampling substrates. Flocked swabs had the highest yield (~1240 ng) compared to the cotton swabs (~184 ng), dental applicators (~533 ng), and dissolvable swabs (~430 ng). The collection efficiency was further evaluated for cotton and flocked swabs using dried microbial samples spotted onto non‐porous surfaces (treated wood, glass, plastic, and tile). Flocked swabs performed consistently better across wood, glass, and tile, but showed decreased recovery from plastic. The cotton swabs failed in the recovery of P. mirabilis DNA across all surfaces. Knowing the appropriate sampling substrate will be useful as others continue to investigate the use of the microbiome as a forensics tool. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8591448/ /pubmed/34964289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1244 Text en © 2021 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Wise, Natalie M. Wagner, Sarah J. Worst, Travis J. Sprague, Jon E. Oechsle, Crystal M. Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms |
title | Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms |
title_full | Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms |
title_fullStr | Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms |
title_short | Comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms |
title_sort | comparison of swab types for collection and analysis of microorganisms |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1244 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wisenataliem comparisonofswabtypesforcollectionandanalysisofmicroorganisms AT wagnersarahj comparisonofswabtypesforcollectionandanalysisofmicroorganisms AT worsttravisj comparisonofswabtypesforcollectionandanalysisofmicroorganisms AT spraguejone comparisonofswabtypesforcollectionandanalysisofmicroorganisms AT oechslecrystalm comparisonofswabtypesforcollectionandanalysisofmicroorganisms |