Cargando…
Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter
Societies continually evolve and speakers use new words to talk about innovative products and practices. While most lexical innovations soon fall into disuse, others spread successfully and become part of the lexicon. In this paper, I conduct a longitudinal study of the spread of 99 English neologis...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.648583 |
_version_ | 1784599279660171264 |
---|---|
author | Würschinger, Quirin |
author_facet | Würschinger, Quirin |
author_sort | Würschinger, Quirin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Societies continually evolve and speakers use new words to talk about innovative products and practices. While most lexical innovations soon fall into disuse, others spread successfully and become part of the lexicon. In this paper, I conduct a longitudinal study of the spread of 99 English neologisms on Twitter to study their degrees and pathways of diffusion. Previous work on lexical innovation has almost exclusively relied on usage frequency for investigating the spread of new words. To get a more differentiated picture of diffusion, I use frequency-based measures to study temporal aspects of diffusion and I use network analyses for a more detailed and accurate investigation of the sociolinguistic dynamics of diffusion. The results show that frequency measures manage to capture diffusion with varying success. Frequency counts can serve as an approximate indicator for overall degrees of diffusion, yet they miss important information about the temporal usage profiles of lexical innovations. The results indicate that neologisms with similar total frequency can exhibit significantly different degrees of diffusion. Analysing differences in their temporal dynamics of use with regard to their age, trends in usage intensity, and volatility contributes to a more accurate account of their diffusion. The results obtained from the social network analysis reveal substantial differences in the social pathways of diffusion. Social diffusion significantly correlates with the frequency and temporal usage profiles of neologisms. However, the network visualisations and metrics identify neologisms whose degrees of social diffusion are more limited than suggested by their overall frequency of use. These include, among others, highly volatile neologisms (e.g., poppygate) and political terms (e.g., alt-left), whose use almost exclusively goes back to single communities of closely-connected, like-minded individuals. I argue that the inclusion of temporal and social information is of particular importance for the study of lexical innovation since neologisms exhibit high degrees of temporal volatility and social indexicality. More generally, the present approach demonstrates the potential of social network analysis for sociolinguistic research on linguistic innovation, variation, and change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8591557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85915572021-11-16 Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter Würschinger, Quirin Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence Societies continually evolve and speakers use new words to talk about innovative products and practices. While most lexical innovations soon fall into disuse, others spread successfully and become part of the lexicon. In this paper, I conduct a longitudinal study of the spread of 99 English neologisms on Twitter to study their degrees and pathways of diffusion. Previous work on lexical innovation has almost exclusively relied on usage frequency for investigating the spread of new words. To get a more differentiated picture of diffusion, I use frequency-based measures to study temporal aspects of diffusion and I use network analyses for a more detailed and accurate investigation of the sociolinguistic dynamics of diffusion. The results show that frequency measures manage to capture diffusion with varying success. Frequency counts can serve as an approximate indicator for overall degrees of diffusion, yet they miss important information about the temporal usage profiles of lexical innovations. The results indicate that neologisms with similar total frequency can exhibit significantly different degrees of diffusion. Analysing differences in their temporal dynamics of use with regard to their age, trends in usage intensity, and volatility contributes to a more accurate account of their diffusion. The results obtained from the social network analysis reveal substantial differences in the social pathways of diffusion. Social diffusion significantly correlates with the frequency and temporal usage profiles of neologisms. However, the network visualisations and metrics identify neologisms whose degrees of social diffusion are more limited than suggested by their overall frequency of use. These include, among others, highly volatile neologisms (e.g., poppygate) and political terms (e.g., alt-left), whose use almost exclusively goes back to single communities of closely-connected, like-minded individuals. I argue that the inclusion of temporal and social information is of particular importance for the study of lexical innovation since neologisms exhibit high degrees of temporal volatility and social indexicality. More generally, the present approach demonstrates the potential of social network analysis for sociolinguistic research on linguistic innovation, variation, and change. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8591557/ /pubmed/34790894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.648583 Text en Copyright © 2021 Würschinger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Artificial Intelligence Würschinger, Quirin Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter |
title | Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter |
title_full | Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter |
title_fullStr | Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter |
title_short | Social Networks of Lexical Innovation. Investigating the Social Dynamics of Diffusion of Neologisms on Twitter |
title_sort | social networks of lexical innovation. investigating the social dynamics of diffusion of neologisms on twitter |
topic | Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.648583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wurschingerquirin socialnetworksoflexicalinnovationinvestigatingthesocialdynamicsofdiffusionofneologismsontwitter |