Cargando…
Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious health issue facing the global population, causing an estimated 646,000 deaths per year globally. Wearable devices typically combine accelerometers, gyroscopes and even barometers; using the data collected and inputting this into an algorithm that decides w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12169-7 |
_version_ | 1784599327833849856 |
---|---|
author | Warrington, Daniel Joseph Shortis, Elizabeth Jane Whittaker, Paula Jane |
author_facet | Warrington, Daniel Joseph Shortis, Elizabeth Jane Whittaker, Paula Jane |
author_sort | Warrington, Daniel Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious health issue facing the global population, causing an estimated 646,000 deaths per year globally. Wearable devices typically combine accelerometers, gyroscopes and even barometers; using the data collected and inputting this into an algorithm that decides whether a fall has occurred. The purpose of this umbrella review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the systematic reviews on the effectiveness of wearable electronic devices for falls detection in adults. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and CINAHL, were searched from their inceptions until April 2019 for systematic reviews that assessed the accuracy of wearable technology in the detection of falls. RESULTS: Seven systematic reviews were included in this review. Due to heterogeneity between the included systematic reviews in their methods and their reporting of results, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Most devices tested used accelerometers, often in combination with gyroscopes. Three systematic reviews reported an average sensitivity of 93.1% or greater and an average specificity of 86.4% or greater for the detection of falls. Placing sensors on the trunk, foot or leg appears to provide the highest accuracy for falls detection, with multiple sensors increasing the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of these devices. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated that wearable device technology offers a low-cost and accurate way to effectively detect falls and summon for help. There are significant differences in the effectiveness of these devices depending on the type of device and its placement. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm the accuracy of these devices in frail older people in real-world settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8591794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85917942021-11-15 Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) Warrington, Daniel Joseph Shortis, Elizabeth Jane Whittaker, Paula Jane BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious health issue facing the global population, causing an estimated 646,000 deaths per year globally. Wearable devices typically combine accelerometers, gyroscopes and even barometers; using the data collected and inputting this into an algorithm that decides whether a fall has occurred. The purpose of this umbrella review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the systematic reviews on the effectiveness of wearable electronic devices for falls detection in adults. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and CINAHL, were searched from their inceptions until April 2019 for systematic reviews that assessed the accuracy of wearable technology in the detection of falls. RESULTS: Seven systematic reviews were included in this review. Due to heterogeneity between the included systematic reviews in their methods and their reporting of results, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Most devices tested used accelerometers, often in combination with gyroscopes. Three systematic reviews reported an average sensitivity of 93.1% or greater and an average specificity of 86.4% or greater for the detection of falls. Placing sensors on the trunk, foot or leg appears to provide the highest accuracy for falls detection, with multiple sensors increasing the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of these devices. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated that wearable device technology offers a low-cost and accurate way to effectively detect falls and summon for help. There are significant differences in the effectiveness of these devices depending on the type of device and its placement. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm the accuracy of these devices in frail older people in real-world settings. BioMed Central 2021-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8591794/ /pubmed/34775947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12169-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Warrington, Daniel Joseph Shortis, Elizabeth Jane Whittaker, Paula Jane Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) |
title | Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) |
title_full | Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) |
title_fullStr | Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) |
title_full_unstemmed | Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) |
title_short | Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) |
title_sort | are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12169-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT warringtondanieljoseph arewearabledeviceseffectiveforpreventinganddetectingfallsanumbrellareviewareviewofsystematicreviews AT shortiselizabethjane arewearabledeviceseffectiveforpreventinganddetectingfallsanumbrellareviewareviewofsystematicreviews AT whittakerpaulajane arewearabledeviceseffectiveforpreventinganddetectingfallsanumbrellareviewareviewofsystematicreviews |