Cargando…

Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)

BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious health issue facing the global population, causing an estimated 646,000 deaths per year globally. Wearable devices typically combine accelerometers, gyroscopes and even barometers; using the data collected and inputting this into an algorithm that decides w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warrington, Daniel Joseph, Shortis, Elizabeth Jane, Whittaker, Paula Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12169-7
_version_ 1784599327833849856
author Warrington, Daniel Joseph
Shortis, Elizabeth Jane
Whittaker, Paula Jane
author_facet Warrington, Daniel Joseph
Shortis, Elizabeth Jane
Whittaker, Paula Jane
author_sort Warrington, Daniel Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious health issue facing the global population, causing an estimated 646,000 deaths per year globally. Wearable devices typically combine accelerometers, gyroscopes and even barometers; using the data collected and inputting this into an algorithm that decides whether a fall has occurred. The purpose of this umbrella review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the systematic reviews on the effectiveness of wearable electronic devices for falls detection in adults. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and CINAHL, were searched from their inceptions until April 2019 for systematic reviews that assessed the accuracy of wearable technology in the detection of falls. RESULTS: Seven systematic reviews were included in this review. Due to heterogeneity between the included systematic reviews in their methods and their reporting of results, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Most devices tested used accelerometers, often in combination with gyroscopes. Three systematic reviews reported an average sensitivity of 93.1% or greater and an average specificity of 86.4% or greater for the detection of falls. Placing sensors on the trunk, foot or leg appears to provide the highest accuracy for falls detection, with multiple sensors increasing the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of these devices. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated that wearable device technology offers a low-cost and accurate way to effectively detect falls and summon for help. There are significant differences in the effectiveness of these devices depending on the type of device and its placement. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm the accuracy of these devices in frail older people in real-world settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8591794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85917942021-11-15 Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews) Warrington, Daniel Joseph Shortis, Elizabeth Jane Whittaker, Paula Jane BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Falls are a common and serious health issue facing the global population, causing an estimated 646,000 deaths per year globally. Wearable devices typically combine accelerometers, gyroscopes and even barometers; using the data collected and inputting this into an algorithm that decides whether a fall has occurred. The purpose of this umbrella review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the systematic reviews on the effectiveness of wearable electronic devices for falls detection in adults. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and CINAHL, were searched from their inceptions until April 2019 for systematic reviews that assessed the accuracy of wearable technology in the detection of falls. RESULTS: Seven systematic reviews were included in this review. Due to heterogeneity between the included systematic reviews in their methods and their reporting of results, a meta-analysis could not be performed. Most devices tested used accelerometers, often in combination with gyroscopes. Three systematic reviews reported an average sensitivity of 93.1% or greater and an average specificity of 86.4% or greater for the detection of falls. Placing sensors on the trunk, foot or leg appears to provide the highest accuracy for falls detection, with multiple sensors increasing the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of these devices. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrated that wearable device technology offers a low-cost and accurate way to effectively detect falls and summon for help. There are significant differences in the effectiveness of these devices depending on the type of device and its placement. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm the accuracy of these devices in frail older people in real-world settings. BioMed Central 2021-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8591794/ /pubmed/34775947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12169-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Warrington, Daniel Joseph
Shortis, Elizabeth Jane
Whittaker, Paula Jane
Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
title Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
title_full Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
title_fullStr Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
title_full_unstemmed Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
title_short Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
title_sort are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12169-7
work_keys_str_mv AT warringtondanieljoseph arewearabledeviceseffectiveforpreventinganddetectingfallsanumbrellareviewareviewofsystematicreviews
AT shortiselizabethjane arewearabledeviceseffectiveforpreventinganddetectingfallsanumbrellareviewareviewofsystematicreviews
AT whittakerpaulajane arewearabledeviceseffectiveforpreventinganddetectingfallsanumbrellareviewareviewofsystematicreviews