Cargando…
Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow
BACKGROUND: Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) induces involuntary muscle contraction. Several studies have suggested that EMS has the potential to be an alternative method of voluntary exercise; however, its effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF) when applied to large lower limb muscles are poorly u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00670-z |
_version_ | 1784599359231361024 |
---|---|
author | Ando, Soichi Takagi, Yoko Watanabe, Hikaru Mochizuki, Kodai Sudo, Mizuki Fujibayashi, Mami Tsurugano, Shinobu Sato, Kohei |
author_facet | Ando, Soichi Takagi, Yoko Watanabe, Hikaru Mochizuki, Kodai Sudo, Mizuki Fujibayashi, Mami Tsurugano, Shinobu Sato, Kohei |
author_sort | Ando, Soichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) induces involuntary muscle contraction. Several studies have suggested that EMS has the potential to be an alternative method of voluntary exercise; however, its effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF) when applied to large lower limb muscles are poorly understood. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of EMS on CBF, focusing on whether the effects differ between the internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral (VA) arteries. METHODS: The participants performed the experiments under EMS and control (rest) conditions in a randomized crossover design. The ICA and VA blood flow were measured before and during EMS or control. Heart rate, blood pressure, minute ventilation, oxygen uptake, and end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO(2)) were monitored and measured as well. RESULTS: The ICA blood flow increased during EMS [Pre: 330 ± 69 mL min(−1); EMS: 371 ± 81 mL min(−1), P = 0.001, effect size (Cohen’s d) = 0.55]. In contrast, the VA blood flow did not change during EMS (Pre: 125 ± 47 mL min(−1); EMS: 130 ± 45 mL min(−1), P = 0.26, effect size = 0.12). In the EMS condition, there was a significant positive linear correlation between ΔP(ET)CO(2) and ΔICA blood flow (R = 0.74, P = 0.02). No relationships were observed between ΔP(ET)CO(2) and ΔVA blood flow (linear: R = − 0.17, P = 0.66; quadratic: R = 0.43, P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that EMS increased ICA blood flow but not VA blood flow, suggesting that the effects of EMS on cerebral perfusion differ between anterior and posterior cerebral circulation, primarily due to the differences in cerebrovascular response to CO(2). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8591929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85919292021-11-15 Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow Ando, Soichi Takagi, Yoko Watanabe, Hikaru Mochizuki, Kodai Sudo, Mizuki Fujibayashi, Mami Tsurugano, Shinobu Sato, Kohei BMC Neurosci Research Article BACKGROUND: Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) induces involuntary muscle contraction. Several studies have suggested that EMS has the potential to be an alternative method of voluntary exercise; however, its effects on cerebral blood flow (CBF) when applied to large lower limb muscles are poorly understood. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of EMS on CBF, focusing on whether the effects differ between the internal carotid (ICA) and vertebral (VA) arteries. METHODS: The participants performed the experiments under EMS and control (rest) conditions in a randomized crossover design. The ICA and VA blood flow were measured before and during EMS or control. Heart rate, blood pressure, minute ventilation, oxygen uptake, and end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO(2)) were monitored and measured as well. RESULTS: The ICA blood flow increased during EMS [Pre: 330 ± 69 mL min(−1); EMS: 371 ± 81 mL min(−1), P = 0.001, effect size (Cohen’s d) = 0.55]. In contrast, the VA blood flow did not change during EMS (Pre: 125 ± 47 mL min(−1); EMS: 130 ± 45 mL min(−1), P = 0.26, effect size = 0.12). In the EMS condition, there was a significant positive linear correlation between ΔP(ET)CO(2) and ΔICA blood flow (R = 0.74, P = 0.02). No relationships were observed between ΔP(ET)CO(2) and ΔVA blood flow (linear: R = − 0.17, P = 0.66; quadratic: R = 0.43, P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that EMS increased ICA blood flow but not VA blood flow, suggesting that the effects of EMS on cerebral perfusion differ between anterior and posterior cerebral circulation, primarily due to the differences in cerebrovascular response to CO(2). BioMed Central 2021-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8591929/ /pubmed/34775960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00670-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ando, Soichi Takagi, Yoko Watanabe, Hikaru Mochizuki, Kodai Sudo, Mizuki Fujibayashi, Mami Tsurugano, Shinobu Sato, Kohei Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow |
title | Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow |
title_full | Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow |
title_fullStr | Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow |
title_short | Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow |
title_sort | effects of electrical muscle stimulation on cerebral blood flow |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12868-021-00670-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andosoichi effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow AT takagiyoko effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow AT watanabehikaru effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow AT mochizukikodai effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow AT sudomizuki effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow AT fujibayashimami effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow AT tsuruganoshinobu effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow AT satokohei effectsofelectricalmusclestimulationoncerebralbloodflow |