Cargando…

Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group

BACKGROUND: To examine the effectiveness of the use of machine learning for adapting an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for a patient group. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 1,611 eyes of 1,169 Japanese patients who received a single model of monofocal IOL (SN60...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mori, Yosai, Yamauchi, Tomofusa, Tokuda, Shota, Minami, Keiichiro, Tabuchi, Hitoshi, Miyata, Kazunori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00265-z
_version_ 1784599365334073344
author Mori, Yosai
Yamauchi, Tomofusa
Tokuda, Shota
Minami, Keiichiro
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Miyata, Kazunori
author_facet Mori, Yosai
Yamauchi, Tomofusa
Tokuda, Shota
Minami, Keiichiro
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Miyata, Kazunori
author_sort Mori, Yosai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To examine the effectiveness of the use of machine learning for adapting an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for a patient group. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 1,611 eyes of 1,169 Japanese patients who received a single model of monofocal IOL (SN60WF, Alcon) at Miyata Eye Hospital were reviewed and analyzed. Using biometric metrics and postoperative refractions of 1211 eyes of 769 patients, constants of the SRK/T and Haigis formulas were optimized. The SRK/T formula was adapted using a support vector regressor. Prediction errors in the use of adapted formulas as well as the SRK/T, Haigis, Hill-RBF and Barrett Universal II formulas were evaluated with data from 395 eyes of 395 distinct patients. Mean prediction errors, median absolute errors, and percentages of eyes within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D, and over + 0.50 D of errors were compared among formulas. RESULTS: The mean prediction errors in the use of the SRT/K and adapted formulas were smaller than the use of other formulas (P < 0.001). In the absolute errors, the Hill-RBF and adapted methods were better than others. The performance of the Barrett Universal II was not better than the others for the patient group. There were the least eyes with hyperopic refractive errors (16.5%) in the use of the adapted formula. CONCLUSIONS: Adapting IOL power calculations using machine learning technology with data from a particular patient group was effective and promising.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8591948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85919482021-11-15 Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group Mori, Yosai Yamauchi, Tomofusa Tokuda, Shota Minami, Keiichiro Tabuchi, Hitoshi Miyata, Kazunori Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: To examine the effectiveness of the use of machine learning for adapting an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for a patient group. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 1,611 eyes of 1,169 Japanese patients who received a single model of monofocal IOL (SN60WF, Alcon) at Miyata Eye Hospital were reviewed and analyzed. Using biometric metrics and postoperative refractions of 1211 eyes of 769 patients, constants of the SRK/T and Haigis formulas were optimized. The SRK/T formula was adapted using a support vector regressor. Prediction errors in the use of adapted formulas as well as the SRK/T, Haigis, Hill-RBF and Barrett Universal II formulas were evaluated with data from 395 eyes of 395 distinct patients. Mean prediction errors, median absolute errors, and percentages of eyes within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D, and over + 0.50 D of errors were compared among formulas. RESULTS: The mean prediction errors in the use of the SRT/K and adapted formulas were smaller than the use of other formulas (P < 0.001). In the absolute errors, the Hill-RBF and adapted methods were better than others. The performance of the Barrett Universal II was not better than the others for the patient group. There were the least eyes with hyperopic refractive errors (16.5%) in the use of the adapted formula. CONCLUSIONS: Adapting IOL power calculations using machine learning technology with data from a particular patient group was effective and promising. BioMed Central 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8591948/ /pubmed/34775991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00265-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mori, Yosai
Yamauchi, Tomofusa
Tokuda, Shota
Minami, Keiichiro
Tabuchi, Hitoshi
Miyata, Kazunori
Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group
title Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group
title_full Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group
title_fullStr Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group
title_short Machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group
title_sort machine learning adaptation of intraocular lens power calculation for a patient group
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-021-00265-z
work_keys_str_mv AT moriyosai machinelearningadaptationofintraocularlenspowercalculationforapatientgroup
AT yamauchitomofusa machinelearningadaptationofintraocularlenspowercalculationforapatientgroup
AT tokudashota machinelearningadaptationofintraocularlenspowercalculationforapatientgroup
AT minamikeiichiro machinelearningadaptationofintraocularlenspowercalculationforapatientgroup
AT tabuchihitoshi machinelearningadaptationofintraocularlenspowercalculationforapatientgroup
AT miyatakazunori machinelearningadaptationofintraocularlenspowercalculationforapatientgroup