Cargando…

Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Main purpose was to describe procedures and identify challenges in the implementation process of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), especially new risks in workflow due to the new technique. We herein report the single center experience for the implementation of (M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia Schüler, Helena Isabel, Pavic, Matea, Mayinger, Michael, Weitkamp, Nienke, Chamberlain, Madalyne, Reiner, Cäcilia, Linsenmeier, Claudia, Balermpas, Panagiotis, Krayenbühl, Jerome, Guckenberger, Matthias, Baumgartl, Michael, Wilke, Lotte, Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie, Andratschke, Nicolaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01945-9
_version_ 1784599367559151616
author Garcia Schüler, Helena Isabel
Pavic, Matea
Mayinger, Michael
Weitkamp, Nienke
Chamberlain, Madalyne
Reiner, Cäcilia
Linsenmeier, Claudia
Balermpas, Panagiotis
Krayenbühl, Jerome
Guckenberger, Matthias
Baumgartl, Michael
Wilke, Lotte
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Andratschke, Nicolaus
author_facet Garcia Schüler, Helena Isabel
Pavic, Matea
Mayinger, Michael
Weitkamp, Nienke
Chamberlain, Madalyne
Reiner, Cäcilia
Linsenmeier, Claudia
Balermpas, Panagiotis
Krayenbühl, Jerome
Guckenberger, Matthias
Baumgartl, Michael
Wilke, Lotte
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Andratschke, Nicolaus
author_sort Garcia Schüler, Helena Isabel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Main purpose was to describe procedures and identify challenges in the implementation process of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), especially new risks in workflow due to the new technique. We herein report the single center experience for the implementation of (MRgRT) and present an overview on our treatment practice. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and technical characteristics of treatment and patient characteristics including sites treated between April 2019 and end of March 2020 after ethical approval. A risk analysis was performed to identify risks of the online adaptive workflow. RESULTS: A summary of the processes on the MR-Linac including workflows, quality assurance and possible pitfalls is presented. 111 patients with 124 courses were treated during the first year of MR-guided radiotherapy. The most commonly treated site was the abdomen (42% of all treatment courses). 73% of the courses were daily online adapted and a high number of treatment courses (75%) were treated with stereotactic body irradiation. Only 4/382 fractions could not be treated due to a failing online adaptive quality assurance. In the risk analysis for errors, the two risks with the highest risk priority number were both in the contouring category, making it the most critical step in the workflow. CONCLUSION: Although challenging, establishment of MRgRT as a routinely used technique at our department was successful for all sites and daily o-ART was feasible from the first day on. However, ongoing research and reports will have to inform us on the optimal indications for MRgRT because careful patient selection is necessary as it continues to be a time-consuming treatment technique with restricted availability. After risk analysis, the most critical workflow category was the contouring process, which resembles the need of experienced staff and safety check paths. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01945-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8591958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85919582021-11-15 Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience Garcia Schüler, Helena Isabel Pavic, Matea Mayinger, Michael Weitkamp, Nienke Chamberlain, Madalyne Reiner, Cäcilia Linsenmeier, Claudia Balermpas, Panagiotis Krayenbühl, Jerome Guckenberger, Matthias Baumgartl, Michael Wilke, Lotte Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie Andratschke, Nicolaus Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Main purpose was to describe procedures and identify challenges in the implementation process of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), especially new risks in workflow due to the new technique. We herein report the single center experience for the implementation of (MRgRT) and present an overview on our treatment practice. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and technical characteristics of treatment and patient characteristics including sites treated between April 2019 and end of March 2020 after ethical approval. A risk analysis was performed to identify risks of the online adaptive workflow. RESULTS: A summary of the processes on the MR-Linac including workflows, quality assurance and possible pitfalls is presented. 111 patients with 124 courses were treated during the first year of MR-guided radiotherapy. The most commonly treated site was the abdomen (42% of all treatment courses). 73% of the courses were daily online adapted and a high number of treatment courses (75%) were treated with stereotactic body irradiation. Only 4/382 fractions could not be treated due to a failing online adaptive quality assurance. In the risk analysis for errors, the two risks with the highest risk priority number were both in the contouring category, making it the most critical step in the workflow. CONCLUSION: Although challenging, establishment of MRgRT as a routinely used technique at our department was successful for all sites and daily o-ART was feasible from the first day on. However, ongoing research and reports will have to inform us on the optimal indications for MRgRT because careful patient selection is necessary as it continues to be a time-consuming treatment technique with restricted availability. After risk analysis, the most critical workflow category was the contouring process, which resembles the need of experienced staff and safety check paths. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01945-9. BioMed Central 2021-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8591958/ /pubmed/34775998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01945-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Garcia Schüler, Helena Isabel
Pavic, Matea
Mayinger, Michael
Weitkamp, Nienke
Chamberlain, Madalyne
Reiner, Cäcilia
Linsenmeier, Claudia
Balermpas, Panagiotis
Krayenbühl, Jerome
Guckenberger, Matthias
Baumgartl, Michael
Wilke, Lotte
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience
title Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience
title_full Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience
title_fullStr Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience
title_short Operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience
title_sort operating procedures, risk management and challenges during implementation of adaptive and non-adaptive mr-guided radiotherapy: 1-year single-center experience
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8591958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01945-9
work_keys_str_mv AT garciaschulerhelenaisabel operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT pavicmatea operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT mayingermichael operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT weitkampnienke operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT chamberlainmadalyne operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT reinercacilia operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT linsenmeierclaudia operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT balermpaspanagiotis operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT krayenbuhljerome operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT guckenbergermatthias operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT baumgartlmichael operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT wilkelotte operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT tanadinilangstephanie operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience
AT andratschkenicolaus operatingproceduresriskmanagementandchallengesduringimplementationofadaptiveandnonadaptivemrguidedradiotherapy1yearsinglecenterexperience