Cargando…

Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics

Introduction: To evaluate the use of inaccurate terminology used by dermatology practices to describe the training and qualifications of their nonphysician clinicians (NPCs) when new patients are booking appointments. Methods: Clinics were randomly selected and called to determine the first availabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Creadore, Andrew, Desai, Sheena, Li, Sara J, Lee, Karen, Xia, Eric, Bui, Ai-Tram N, Villa-Ruiz, Camila, Lo, Kelly, Mostaghimi, Arash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804659
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18793
_version_ 1784599431135363072
author Creadore, Andrew
Desai, Sheena
Li, Sara J
Lee, Karen
Xia, Eric
Bui, Ai-Tram N
Villa-Ruiz, Camila
Lo, Kelly
Mostaghimi, Arash
author_facet Creadore, Andrew
Desai, Sheena
Li, Sara J
Lee, Karen
Xia, Eric
Bui, Ai-Tram N
Villa-Ruiz, Camila
Lo, Kelly
Mostaghimi, Arash
author_sort Creadore, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Introduction: To evaluate the use of inaccurate terminology used by dermatology practices to describe the training and qualifications of their nonphysician clinicians (NPCs) when new patients are booking appointments. Methods: Clinics were randomly selected and called to determine the first available appointment for a new patient with a new and changing mole. If the receptionist confirmed the first-offered appointment was with an NPC, the encounter was included in this study. If receptionists used inaccurate terminology to describe the NPCs and their qualifications, this instance was recorded along with the specific language that they used. Results: A total of 344 unique dermatology clinics were contacted on February 27, 2020, in 25 states. Phone calls at 128 clinics (37.2%) met our inclusion criterion. Inaccurate language was used to describe NPCs at 23 (18%) unique clinic locations across 12 states, with “dermatologist,” “doctor,” “physician,” and “board-certified” being used to describe NPCs as the most common inaccurate terms. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that front office staff at dermatology clinics use inaccurate and potentially misleading terminology to refer to NPCs working in their clinics. While we cannot establish whether this is intentional or due to a lack of training, additional focus should be placed on accurately representing provider qualifications to patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8592314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85923142021-11-18 Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics Creadore, Andrew Desai, Sheena Li, Sara J Lee, Karen Xia, Eric Bui, Ai-Tram N Villa-Ruiz, Camila Lo, Kelly Mostaghimi, Arash Cureus Dermatology Introduction: To evaluate the use of inaccurate terminology used by dermatology practices to describe the training and qualifications of their nonphysician clinicians (NPCs) when new patients are booking appointments. Methods: Clinics were randomly selected and called to determine the first available appointment for a new patient with a new and changing mole. If the receptionist confirmed the first-offered appointment was with an NPC, the encounter was included in this study. If receptionists used inaccurate terminology to describe the NPCs and their qualifications, this instance was recorded along with the specific language that they used. Results: A total of 344 unique dermatology clinics were contacted on February 27, 2020, in 25 states. Phone calls at 128 clinics (37.2%) met our inclusion criterion. Inaccurate language was used to describe NPCs at 23 (18%) unique clinic locations across 12 states, with “dermatologist,” “doctor,” “physician,” and “board-certified” being used to describe NPCs as the most common inaccurate terms. Conclusion: These findings demonstrate that front office staff at dermatology clinics use inaccurate and potentially misleading terminology to refer to NPCs working in their clinics. While we cannot establish whether this is intentional or due to a lack of training, additional focus should be placed on accurately representing provider qualifications to patients. Cureus 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8592314/ /pubmed/34804659 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18793 Text en Copyright © 2021, Creadore et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dermatology
Creadore, Andrew
Desai, Sheena
Li, Sara J
Lee, Karen
Xia, Eric
Bui, Ai-Tram N
Villa-Ruiz, Camila
Lo, Kelly
Mostaghimi, Arash
Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics
title Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics
title_full Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics
title_fullStr Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics
title_short Prevalence of Misrepresentation of Nonphysician Clinicians at Dermatology Clinics
title_sort prevalence of misrepresentation of nonphysician clinicians at dermatology clinics
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804659
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18793
work_keys_str_mv AT creadoreandrew prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT desaisheena prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT lisaraj prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT leekaren prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT xiaeric prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT buiaitramn prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT villaruizcamila prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT lokelly prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics
AT mostaghimiarash prevalenceofmisrepresentationofnonphysiciancliniciansatdermatologyclinics