Cargando…

Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study

Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyde, Daniel C., Mou, Yi, Berteletti, Ilaria, Spelke, Elizabeth S., Dehaene, Stanislas, Piazza, Manuela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34780526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259775
_version_ 1784599453831790592
author Hyde, Daniel C.
Mou, Yi
Berteletti, Ilaria
Spelke, Elizabeth S.
Dehaene, Stanislas
Piazza, Manuela
author_facet Hyde, Daniel C.
Mou, Yi
Berteletti, Ilaria
Spelke, Elizabeth S.
Dehaene, Stanislas
Piazza, Manuela
author_sort Hyde, Daniel C.
collection PubMed
description Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged children. We assigned pre-school children in the U.S. and Italy (N = 215; Mean age = 49.15 months) to play one of five versions of a computer-based numerical comparison game for two weeks. The different versions of the game were equated on basic features of gameplay and demands but systematically varied in numerical content. Critically, some versions included non-symbolic numerical comparisons only, while others combined non-symbolic numerical comparison with symbolic aids of various types. Before and after training we assessed four components of early numeracy: counting proficiency, non-symbolic numerical comparison, one-to-one correspondence, and arithmetic set transformation. We found that overall children showed improvement in most of these components after completing these short trainings. However, children trained on numerical comparisons with symbolic aids made larger gains on assessments of one-to-one correspondence and arithmetic transformation compared to children whose training involved non-symbolic numerical comparison only. Further exploratory analyses suggested that, although there were no major differences between children trained with verbal symbols (e.g., verbal counting) and non-verbal visuo-spatial symbols (i.e., abacus counting), the gains in one-to-one correspondence may have been driven by abacus training, while the gains in non-verbal arithmetic transformations may have been driven by verbal training. These results provide initial evidence that the introduction of symbols may contribute to the emergence of numeracy by enhancing the capacity for thinking about exact equality and the numerical effects of set transformations. More broadly, this study provides an empirical basis to motivate further focused study of the processes by which children’s mastery of symbols influences children’s developing mastery of numeracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8592431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85924312021-11-16 Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study Hyde, Daniel C. Mou, Yi Berteletti, Ilaria Spelke, Elizabeth S. Dehaene, Stanislas Piazza, Manuela PLoS One Research Article Numeracy is of critical importance for scholastic success and modern-day living, but the precise mechanisms that drive its development are poorly understood. Here we used novel experimental training methods to begin to investigate the role of symbols in the development of numeracy in preschool-aged children. We assigned pre-school children in the U.S. and Italy (N = 215; Mean age = 49.15 months) to play one of five versions of a computer-based numerical comparison game for two weeks. The different versions of the game were equated on basic features of gameplay and demands but systematically varied in numerical content. Critically, some versions included non-symbolic numerical comparisons only, while others combined non-symbolic numerical comparison with symbolic aids of various types. Before and after training we assessed four components of early numeracy: counting proficiency, non-symbolic numerical comparison, one-to-one correspondence, and arithmetic set transformation. We found that overall children showed improvement in most of these components after completing these short trainings. However, children trained on numerical comparisons with symbolic aids made larger gains on assessments of one-to-one correspondence and arithmetic transformation compared to children whose training involved non-symbolic numerical comparison only. Further exploratory analyses suggested that, although there were no major differences between children trained with verbal symbols (e.g., verbal counting) and non-verbal visuo-spatial symbols (i.e., abacus counting), the gains in one-to-one correspondence may have been driven by abacus training, while the gains in non-verbal arithmetic transformations may have been driven by verbal training. These results provide initial evidence that the introduction of symbols may contribute to the emergence of numeracy by enhancing the capacity for thinking about exact equality and the numerical effects of set transformations. More broadly, this study provides an empirical basis to motivate further focused study of the processes by which children’s mastery of symbols influences children’s developing mastery of numeracy. Public Library of Science 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8592431/ /pubmed/34780526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259775 Text en © 2021 Hyde et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hyde, Daniel C.
Mou, Yi
Berteletti, Ilaria
Spelke, Elizabeth S.
Dehaene, Stanislas
Piazza, Manuela
Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study
title Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study
title_full Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study
title_fullStr Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study
title_short Testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: An experimental computer-based intervention study
title_sort testing the role of symbols in preschool numeracy: an experimental computer-based intervention study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34780526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259775
work_keys_str_mv AT hydedanielc testingtheroleofsymbolsinpreschoolnumeracyanexperimentalcomputerbasedinterventionstudy
AT mouyi testingtheroleofsymbolsinpreschoolnumeracyanexperimentalcomputerbasedinterventionstudy
AT bertelettiilaria testingtheroleofsymbolsinpreschoolnumeracyanexperimentalcomputerbasedinterventionstudy
AT spelkeelizabeths testingtheroleofsymbolsinpreschoolnumeracyanexperimentalcomputerbasedinterventionstudy
AT dehaenestanislas testingtheroleofsymbolsinpreschoolnumeracyanexperimentalcomputerbasedinterventionstudy
AT piazzamanuela testingtheroleofsymbolsinpreschoolnumeracyanexperimentalcomputerbasedinterventionstudy