Cargando…
Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review
BACKGROUND: Digital health (DH) and the benefits of related services are fairly well understood. However, it still is critical to map the digital health care landscape including the key elements that define it as an ecosystem. Particularly, knowing the perspectives of citizens on this digital transf...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34780547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260058 |
_version_ | 1784599462938673152 |
---|---|
author | Oshni Alvandi, Abraham Bain, Chris Burstein, Frada |
author_facet | Oshni Alvandi, Abraham Bain, Chris Burstein, Frada |
author_sort | Oshni Alvandi, Abraham |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital health (DH) and the benefits of related services are fairly well understood. However, it still is critical to map the digital health care landscape including the key elements that define it as an ecosystem. Particularly, knowing the perspectives of citizens on this digital transformation is an important angle to capture. In this review we aim to analyze the relevant studies to identify how DH is understood and experienced by Australian citizens and what they may require from DH platforms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping literature review was conducted across several electronic databases (ACM Digital Library, OVID, PubMed, Scopus, IEEE, Science Direct, SAGE), as well as grey literature. Additionally, citation mining was conducted to identify further relevant studies. Identified studies were subjected to eligibility criteria and the final set of articles was independently reviewed, analyzed, discussed and interpreted by three reviewers. RESULTS: Of 3811 articles, 98 articles met the inclusion criteria with research-based articles–as opposed to review articles or white papers– comprising the largest proportion (72%) of the selected literature. The qualitative analysis of the literature revealed five key elements that capture the essence of the digital health ecosystem interventions from the viewpoint of the Australian citizens. The identified elements were “consumer/user”, “health care”, “technology”, “use and usability”, “data and information”. These elements were further found to be associated with 127 subcategories. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first of its kind to analyze and synthesize the relevant literature on DH ecosystems from the citizens’ perspective. Through the lens of two research questions, this study defines the key components that were found crucial to understanding citizens’ experiences with DH. This understanding lays a strong foundation for designing and fostering DH ecosystem. The results provide a solid ground for empirical testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8592460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85924602021-11-16 Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review Oshni Alvandi, Abraham Bain, Chris Burstein, Frada PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Digital health (DH) and the benefits of related services are fairly well understood. However, it still is critical to map the digital health care landscape including the key elements that define it as an ecosystem. Particularly, knowing the perspectives of citizens on this digital transformation is an important angle to capture. In this review we aim to analyze the relevant studies to identify how DH is understood and experienced by Australian citizens and what they may require from DH platforms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping literature review was conducted across several electronic databases (ACM Digital Library, OVID, PubMed, Scopus, IEEE, Science Direct, SAGE), as well as grey literature. Additionally, citation mining was conducted to identify further relevant studies. Identified studies were subjected to eligibility criteria and the final set of articles was independently reviewed, analyzed, discussed and interpreted by three reviewers. RESULTS: Of 3811 articles, 98 articles met the inclusion criteria with research-based articles–as opposed to review articles or white papers– comprising the largest proportion (72%) of the selected literature. The qualitative analysis of the literature revealed five key elements that capture the essence of the digital health ecosystem interventions from the viewpoint of the Australian citizens. The identified elements were “consumer/user”, “health care”, “technology”, “use and usability”, “data and information”. These elements were further found to be associated with 127 subcategories. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first of its kind to analyze and synthesize the relevant literature on DH ecosystems from the citizens’ perspective. Through the lens of two research questions, this study defines the key components that were found crucial to understanding citizens’ experiences with DH. This understanding lays a strong foundation for designing and fostering DH ecosystem. The results provide a solid ground for empirical testing. Public Library of Science 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8592460/ /pubmed/34780547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260058 Text en © 2021 Oshni Alvandi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Oshni Alvandi, Abraham Bain, Chris Burstein, Frada Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review |
title | Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review |
title_full | Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review |
title_short | Understanding digital health ecosystem from Australian citizens’ perspective: A scoping review |
title_sort | understanding digital health ecosystem from australian citizens’ perspective: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34780547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260058 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oshnialvandiabraham understandingdigitalhealthecosystemfromaustraliancitizensperspectiveascopingreview AT bainchris understandingdigitalhealthecosystemfromaustraliancitizensperspectiveascopingreview AT bursteinfrada understandingdigitalhealthecosystemfromaustraliancitizensperspectiveascopingreview |