Cargando…

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the completeness of reporting of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning methods in the field of oncology. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a systematic review, searching the MEDLINE and Embase databases between 01/01/2019 and 05/09/2019, for non-imagi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Dhiman, Paula, Ma, Jie, Navarro, Constanza Andaur, Speich, Benjamin, Bullock, Garrett, Damen, Johanna AA, Kirtley, Shona, Hooft, Lotty, Riley, Richard D, Van Calster, Ben, Moons, Karel G.M., Collins, Gary S.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Elsevier 2021
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34214626 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.024

Ejemplares similares

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
por: Andaur Navarro, Constanza L., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies
por: Damen, Johanna A.A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
por: Debray, Thomas PA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
por: Snell, Kym I E, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Artificial intelligence in lung cancer diagnostic imaging: a review of the reporting and conduct of research published 2018–2019
por: Logullo, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The increasing need for systematic reviews of prognosis studies: strategies to facilitate review production and improve quality of primary research
por: Damen, Johanna A. A. G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
por: Heus, Pauline, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A review found inadequate reporting of case–control studies of risk factors for pancreatic cancer
por: MacCarthy, Angela, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Damen, Johanna A., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal
por: Wynants, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Minimal reporting improvement after peer review in reports of COVID-19 prediction models: systematic review
por: Hudda, Mohammed T., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effectiveness of contact tracing apps for SARS-CoV-2: a rapid systematic review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting guideline checklists are not quality evaluation forms: they are guidance for writing
por: Logullo, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
por: Debray, Thomas P A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
por: Debray, Thomas P A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement
por: Collins, Gary S, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
por: Dhiman, Paula, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
por: Collins, Gary S., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reporting guidelines for oncology research: helping to maximise the impact of your research
por: MacCarthy, Angela, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Overdiagnosis across medical disciplines: a scoping review
por: Jenniskens, Kevin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
por: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Amir H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Incorporating quality assessments of primary studies in the conclusions of diagnostic accuracy reviews: a cross-sectional study
por: Ochodo, Eleanor A, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement
por: Vinkers, Christiaan H., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomes
por: Riley, Richard D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting guidelines should be free to publish, read, and use
por: Logullo, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: a systematic review protocol
por: Gerry, Stephen, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Developing and validating risk prediction models in an individual participant data meta-analysis
por: Ahmed, Ikhlaaq, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
por: Damen, Johanna A A G, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
por: Nguyen, Tri‐Long, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: systematic review and critical appraisal of methodology
por: Gerry, Stephen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Small-study effects and time trends in diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study
por: van Enst, Wynanda Annefloor, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reporting guidelines: tools to increase the completeness and transparency of your anesthesiology research paper
por: Quintão, Vinícius Caldeira, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_f9p83odidg7ch7ph5484jamj7m