Cargando…

Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study

BACKGROUND: In ureterorenoscopy, anaesthesiologists are preferring regional anaesthesia to avoid postoperative complications, while surgeons are preferring general anaesthesia to avoid ureteral trauma. China has not published its guidelines and not referring to the European Association of Urology gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Haoliang, Wu, Xiaohui, Chen, Xi, Chen, Wenting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1998596
_version_ 1784599500391710720
author Cai, Haoliang
Wu, Xiaohui
Chen, Xi
Chen, Wenting
author_facet Cai, Haoliang
Wu, Xiaohui
Chen, Xi
Chen, Wenting
author_sort Cai, Haoliang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In ureterorenoscopy, anaesthesiologists are preferring regional anaesthesia to avoid postoperative complications, while surgeons are preferring general anaesthesia to avoid ureteral trauma. China has not published its guidelines and not referring to the European Association of Urology guidelines. The objectives of study were to evaluate the effects of general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes of ureterorenoscopy. METHODS: Charts of a total of 392 patients with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I or II, and underwent flexible ureterorenoscopy for removal of the proximal, middle, or distal ureteral single stone under general anaesthesia (GA group; n = 145) or spinal anaesthesia (SA group; n = 131) or epidural anaesthesia (EA group; n = 116) were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The dilatation time for patients of GA group was fewer than those of SA (104.01 ± 12.77 sec/patient vs. 130.55 ± 22.53 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 17.0350) and EA (104.01 ± 12.77 sec/patient vs. 147.03 ± 18.76 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 26.7240) groups. The time to reach to stone for patients of GA group was fewer than those of SA (126.68 ± 12.59 sec/patient vs. 137.60 ± 17.84 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 8.4510) and EA (126.68 ± 12.59 sec/patient vs. 149.44 ± 14.85 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 17.0350) groups. The lithotripsy time (p = .359), operation time (p = .449), intraoperative complications (p = .058), and length of hospital stays (p = .057) of patients were same among groups. Visual analog scale pain scores of patients of the GA group found higher among groups. General anaesthesia caused nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests general anaesthesia for flexible ureterorenoscopy if there is no contraindication. KEY MESSAGE: General anaesthesia facilitates early dilatation of ureters and access to the stone. No strong correlation of the anaesthesia method of choice with lithotripsy time, operation time, intraoperative complications, stone-free conditions, and length of hospital stays. Epidural and spinal anaesthesia have advantages of fewer postoperative pain and better postoperative outcomes for flexible ureterorenoscopy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8592613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85926132021-11-16 Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study Cai, Haoliang Wu, Xiaohui Chen, Xi Chen, Wenting Ann Med Anesthesiology BACKGROUND: In ureterorenoscopy, anaesthesiologists are preferring regional anaesthesia to avoid postoperative complications, while surgeons are preferring general anaesthesia to avoid ureteral trauma. China has not published its guidelines and not referring to the European Association of Urology guidelines. The objectives of study were to evaluate the effects of general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes of ureterorenoscopy. METHODS: Charts of a total of 392 patients with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I or II, and underwent flexible ureterorenoscopy for removal of the proximal, middle, or distal ureteral single stone under general anaesthesia (GA group; n = 145) or spinal anaesthesia (SA group; n = 131) or epidural anaesthesia (EA group; n = 116) were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The dilatation time for patients of GA group was fewer than those of SA (104.01 ± 12.77 sec/patient vs. 130.55 ± 22.53 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 17.0350) and EA (104.01 ± 12.77 sec/patient vs. 147.03 ± 18.76 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 26.7240) groups. The time to reach to stone for patients of GA group was fewer than those of SA (126.68 ± 12.59 sec/patient vs. 137.60 ± 17.84 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 8.4510) and EA (126.68 ± 12.59 sec/patient vs. 149.44 ± 14.85 sec/patient, p < .0001, q = 17.0350) groups. The lithotripsy time (p = .359), operation time (p = .449), intraoperative complications (p = .058), and length of hospital stays (p = .057) of patients were same among groups. Visual analog scale pain scores of patients of the GA group found higher among groups. General anaesthesia caused nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests general anaesthesia for flexible ureterorenoscopy if there is no contraindication. KEY MESSAGE: General anaesthesia facilitates early dilatation of ureters and access to the stone. No strong correlation of the anaesthesia method of choice with lithotripsy time, operation time, intraoperative complications, stone-free conditions, and length of hospital stays. Epidural and spinal anaesthesia have advantages of fewer postoperative pain and better postoperative outcomes for flexible ureterorenoscopy. Taylor & Francis 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8592613/ /pubmed/34779319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1998596 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Cai, Haoliang
Wu, Xiaohui
Chen, Xi
Chen, Wenting
Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study
title Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study
title_full Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study
title_short Comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study
title_sort comparison of the effects of general, spinal and epidural anesthesia on ureter access and surgical outcomes during flexible ureterorenoscopy for transurethral single stone removal surgeries: a monocentric retrospective study
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1998596
work_keys_str_mv AT caihaoliang comparisonoftheeffectsofgeneralspinalandepiduralanesthesiaonureteraccessandsurgicaloutcomesduringflexibleureterorenoscopyfortransurethralsinglestoneremovalsurgeriesamonocentricretrospectivestudy
AT wuxiaohui comparisonoftheeffectsofgeneralspinalandepiduralanesthesiaonureteraccessandsurgicaloutcomesduringflexibleureterorenoscopyfortransurethralsinglestoneremovalsurgeriesamonocentricretrospectivestudy
AT chenxi comparisonoftheeffectsofgeneralspinalandepiduralanesthesiaonureteraccessandsurgicaloutcomesduringflexibleureterorenoscopyfortransurethralsinglestoneremovalsurgeriesamonocentricretrospectivestudy
AT chenwenting comparisonoftheeffectsofgeneralspinalandepiduralanesthesiaonureteraccessandsurgicaloutcomesduringflexibleureterorenoscopyfortransurethralsinglestoneremovalsurgeriesamonocentricretrospectivestudy