Cargando…

The virtues of the virtual medical school interview

The COVID-19 pandemic has mandated the use of virtual interactions in medical school. Although this falls mainly in the area of didactic instruction, of necessity, it has extended to the critical Admissions Process and the Medical School Interview itself. The California University of Science and Med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eveland, A. Peter, Prado, Lissett G., Wilhelm, Sabrina R., Wong, Stephanie, Barsky, Sanford H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1992820
_version_ 1784599501759053824
author Eveland, A. Peter
Prado, Lissett G.
Wilhelm, Sabrina R.
Wong, Stephanie
Barsky, Sanford H.
author_facet Eveland, A. Peter
Prado, Lissett G.
Wilhelm, Sabrina R.
Wong, Stephanie
Barsky, Sanford H.
author_sort Eveland, A. Peter
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic has mandated the use of virtual interactions in medical school. Although this falls mainly in the area of didactic instruction, of necessity, it has extended to the critical Admissions Process and the Medical School Interview itself. The California University of Science and Medicine (CUSM) with their flipped classroom approach had previously entered a virtual space of instruction even before COVID-19. Because CUSM was, in a sense, already committed to ‘virtual’ education, in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, CUSM focused not on what it might lose but what it might gain and what their applicants to medical school might gain with the virtual format. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to initially compare the Virtual Interview with the traditional On-Campus (In-Person) Interview during the hybrid 2020 year when the COVID-19 pandemic began. The Virtual Interview was patterned after the On-Campus Interview with some modifications. The same faculty conducted both interviews. A number of inherent advantages of the Virtual Interview surfaced to these faculty interviewers based on their subjective observations and conclusions. The overall interviewee satisfaction with the Virtual Interview was very positive based on their subjective observations and conclusions. The objective data from the Virtual Interviews compared to the On-Campus Interviews in the hybrid year resulted in a greater percentage of both offers of acceptance (p = .001) and matriculations (p = .001). In order to strengthen our initial observations, we expanded our study to include 2 pre-COVID-19 years (2018, 2019) of exclusively On-Campus interviews (n = 743) and 1 additional COVID-19 year (2021) of exclusively Virtual Interviews (n = 529). In this expanded study, interviewee demographics were not confounding and the Virtual Interview gave rise to overall greater interviewee satisfaction (p = .001), a trend to greater interviewer satisfaction and a greater percentage of both offers of acceptance (p = .047) and matriculations (p = .036).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8592618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85926182021-11-16 The virtues of the virtual medical school interview Eveland, A. Peter Prado, Lissett G. Wilhelm, Sabrina R. Wong, Stephanie Barsky, Sanford H. Med Educ Online Research Article The COVID-19 pandemic has mandated the use of virtual interactions in medical school. Although this falls mainly in the area of didactic instruction, of necessity, it has extended to the critical Admissions Process and the Medical School Interview itself. The California University of Science and Medicine (CUSM) with their flipped classroom approach had previously entered a virtual space of instruction even before COVID-19. Because CUSM was, in a sense, already committed to ‘virtual’ education, in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, CUSM focused not on what it might lose but what it might gain and what their applicants to medical school might gain with the virtual format. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to initially compare the Virtual Interview with the traditional On-Campus (In-Person) Interview during the hybrid 2020 year when the COVID-19 pandemic began. The Virtual Interview was patterned after the On-Campus Interview with some modifications. The same faculty conducted both interviews. A number of inherent advantages of the Virtual Interview surfaced to these faculty interviewers based on their subjective observations and conclusions. The overall interviewee satisfaction with the Virtual Interview was very positive based on their subjective observations and conclusions. The objective data from the Virtual Interviews compared to the On-Campus Interviews in the hybrid year resulted in a greater percentage of both offers of acceptance (p = .001) and matriculations (p = .001). In order to strengthen our initial observations, we expanded our study to include 2 pre-COVID-19 years (2018, 2019) of exclusively On-Campus interviews (n = 743) and 1 additional COVID-19 year (2021) of exclusively Virtual Interviews (n = 529). In this expanded study, interviewee demographics were not confounding and the Virtual Interview gave rise to overall greater interviewee satisfaction (p = .001), a trend to greater interviewer satisfaction and a greater percentage of both offers of acceptance (p = .047) and matriculations (p = .036). Taylor & Francis 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8592618/ /pubmed/34758706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1992820 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Eveland, A. Peter
Prado, Lissett G.
Wilhelm, Sabrina R.
Wong, Stephanie
Barsky, Sanford H.
The virtues of the virtual medical school interview
title The virtues of the virtual medical school interview
title_full The virtues of the virtual medical school interview
title_fullStr The virtues of the virtual medical school interview
title_full_unstemmed The virtues of the virtual medical school interview
title_short The virtues of the virtual medical school interview
title_sort virtues of the virtual medical school interview
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34758706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1992820
work_keys_str_mv AT evelandapeter thevirtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT pradolissettg thevirtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT wilhelmsabrinar thevirtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT wongstephanie thevirtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT barskysanfordh thevirtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT evelandapeter virtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT pradolissettg virtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT wilhelmsabrinar virtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT wongstephanie virtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview
AT barskysanfordh virtuesofthevirtualmedicalschoolinterview