Cargando…

Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting

There is not a described method to count the core label of c-Fos-positive neurons, avoiding false-positive and false-negative results. The aim of this manuscript is to provide guidelines for a secure and accurate method to calculate a threshold to select which core of c-Fos-positive neurons marked b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Silva, Wellington José, Silva, José Rodrigo Santos, de Souza Siqueira Quintans, Jullyana, de Lucca Junior, Waldecy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3060983
_version_ 1784599519932973056
author da Silva, Wellington José
Silva, José Rodrigo Santos
de Souza Siqueira Quintans, Jullyana
de Lucca Junior, Waldecy
author_facet da Silva, Wellington José
Silva, José Rodrigo Santos
de Souza Siqueira Quintans, Jullyana
de Lucca Junior, Waldecy
author_sort da Silva, Wellington José
collection PubMed
description There is not a described method to count the core label of c-Fos-positive neurons, avoiding false-positive and false-negative results. The aim of this manuscript is to provide guidelines for a secure and accurate method to calculate a threshold to select which core of c-Fos-positive neurons marked by immunofluorescence has to be scored. A background percentage was calculated by dividing the intensity value (0 to 255) of the core of c-Fos-positive neurons by its surrounding background from the 8-bit images obtained in a previous study. Using the background percentage from 20% up to 98%, raising 2% once for each score, as threshold to choose which core has to be counted, a script was written for the R program to count the number of the c-Fos-positive neurons and the comparison between control and experimental groups. The differences of the average number of the core counted c-Fos-positive neurons between control and experimental groups, at all thresholds studied, showed a rising value related to an increase of the background percentage threshold as well as a decrease of its p value related to an increase of the threshold of background percentage. For the smallest thresholds (high intensity of label), the differences between groups are suppressed (false negative). However, for the biggest thresholds (nonspecific label), these differences are always the same (false positive). Therefore, to avoid the false-negative and the false-positive values, it was chosen as the threshold of 62% the inflection point of the linear regression, which is equally different from the biggest and smallest values of the differences between groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8592694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85926942021-11-16 Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting da Silva, Wellington José Silva, José Rodrigo Santos de Souza Siqueira Quintans, Jullyana de Lucca Junior, Waldecy Biomed Res Int Research Article There is not a described method to count the core label of c-Fos-positive neurons, avoiding false-positive and false-negative results. The aim of this manuscript is to provide guidelines for a secure and accurate method to calculate a threshold to select which core of c-Fos-positive neurons marked by immunofluorescence has to be scored. A background percentage was calculated by dividing the intensity value (0 to 255) of the core of c-Fos-positive neurons by its surrounding background from the 8-bit images obtained in a previous study. Using the background percentage from 20% up to 98%, raising 2% once for each score, as threshold to choose which core has to be counted, a script was written for the R program to count the number of the c-Fos-positive neurons and the comparison between control and experimental groups. The differences of the average number of the core counted c-Fos-positive neurons between control and experimental groups, at all thresholds studied, showed a rising value related to an increase of the background percentage threshold as well as a decrease of its p value related to an increase of the threshold of background percentage. For the smallest thresholds (high intensity of label), the differences between groups are suppressed (false negative). However, for the biggest thresholds (nonspecific label), these differences are always the same (false positive). Therefore, to avoid the false-negative and the false-positive values, it was chosen as the threshold of 62% the inflection point of the linear regression, which is equally different from the biggest and smallest values of the differences between groups. Hindawi 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8592694/ /pubmed/34790818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3060983 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wellington José da Silva et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
da Silva, Wellington José
Silva, José Rodrigo Santos
de Souza Siqueira Quintans, Jullyana
de Lucca Junior, Waldecy
Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting
title Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting
title_full Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting
title_fullStr Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting
title_full_unstemmed Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting
title_short Increased Accuracy to c-Fos-Positive Neuron Counting
title_sort increased accuracy to c-fos-positive neuron counting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/3060983
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvawellingtonjose increasedaccuracytocfospositiveneuroncounting
AT silvajoserodrigosantos increasedaccuracytocfospositiveneuroncounting
AT desouzasiqueiraquintansjullyana increasedaccuracytocfospositiveneuroncounting
AT deluccajuniorwaldecy increasedaccuracytocfospositiveneuroncounting