Cargando…
Prognostic Value of the CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc Score after Endovascular Therapy for Femoral Popliteal Artery Lesions
Aim: Originally developed for predicting the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score also has the potential to predict the risk of other cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Japan Atherosclerosis Society
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487619 http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.60772 |
Sumario: | Aim: Originally developed for predicting the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score also has the potential to predict the risk of other cardiovascular disease. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requiring Femoral popliteal (FP) endovascular therapy (EVT). Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study analyzed the clinical database of 2190 patients who underwent FP EVT for symptomatic PAD (Rutherford categories 2–4) between January 2010 and December 2018. We calculated the CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score and then investigated the association between the score, as well as AF, and their prognosis. Outcome measures were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse limb events (MALEs). Results: During a median follow-up of 3.0 years (interquartile range, 1.5–5.0 years), 532 MACEs and 562 MALEs occurred. The CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score and AF were independently associated with an increased risk of MACEs; their adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] were 1.28 [1.20–1.36] ( P <0.001) per 1-point increase and 1.49 [1.06–2.09] ( P =0.022), respectively. The CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score was almost linearly associated with MACEs, without any clear threshold point. On the other hand, these variables were not associated with MALEs risk ( P =0.32 and 0.48). Conclusion: The CHA (2) DS (2) -VASc score and AF were independently associated with the increased risk of MACEs but not of MALEs in patients with symptomatic PAD who underwent FP EVT. The score might be useful in stratifying the MACEs risk in this type of patients. |
---|