Cargando…

Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction?

Background: Laparotomy (open surgery) is considered the standard approach for acute small bowel obstruction (ASBO). However, with the advent of minimally invasive surgery, the laparoscopic approach is gaining popularity. There is no consensus on the appropriate setting for laparoscopic therapy for s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harvitkar, Rafique Umer, Kumar, Peri Harish, Joshi, Abhijit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804685
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18828
_version_ 1784599558368526336
author Harvitkar, Rafique Umer
Kumar, Peri Harish
Joshi, Abhijit
author_facet Harvitkar, Rafique Umer
Kumar, Peri Harish
Joshi, Abhijit
author_sort Harvitkar, Rafique Umer
collection PubMed
description Background: Laparotomy (open surgery) is considered the standard approach for acute small bowel obstruction (ASBO). However, with the advent of minimally invasive surgery, the laparoscopic approach is gaining popularity. There is no consensus on the appropriate setting for laparoscopic therapy for small bowel obstruction (SBO). Aim and objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for ASBO. Patients and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the prospectively collected data of all the 38 patients who had undergone laparoscopy for ASBO, performed by a single surgeon at our institution, due to adhesions (30 patients), internal hernias (five patients), midgut malrotation (one patient), ileo-ileal intussusception (one patient), and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome (one patient) from 2012 to 2020. Data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical records (EMR) for the following parameters of each individual patient: age, sex, clinical presentation, preoperative investigation findings, final diagnosis, surgical details, operating time, time to postoperative oral feeds, length of hospital stay, complications, recurrences, and time taken to resume normal activity. A preoperative abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) was performed in all the cases. Patients with peritonitis and septic shock were excluded from the study.  Results: The mean age of the 38 patients was 58 years (ranged between 33 and 83 years) with a standard deviation (SD) of 16.5. The mean age of the female patients in the study was 60.5 years with an SD of 16.6, while the mean age of the male patients was 54.9 years (SD = 16.2). The age difference between male and female patients in the study was not statistically significant (p = 0.36). The mean operating time was 74.4 minutes (range: 60-90 minutes, with an SD of 7.2). The mean time to oral liquid/soft diet was 2.5 days. The mean postoperative stay was 5.7 days. Three patients (8%) underwent conversion to open surgery, out of which two patients had multiple complex bowel-to-bowel and bowel-to-parietes adhesions, and in one patient, massive distension of small bowel caused technical difficulties. Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of ASBO is feasible, effective, and safe. Optimum surgical techniques, the surgeon's experience with the procedure, and stringent patient selection criteria enable a high probability of success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8592819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85928192021-11-19 Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction? Harvitkar, Rafique Umer Kumar, Peri Harish Joshi, Abhijit Cureus Gastroenterology Background: Laparotomy (open surgery) is considered the standard approach for acute small bowel obstruction (ASBO). However, with the advent of minimally invasive surgery, the laparoscopic approach is gaining popularity. There is no consensus on the appropriate setting for laparoscopic therapy for small bowel obstruction (SBO). Aim and objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for ASBO. Patients and methods: We retrospectively evaluated the prospectively collected data of all the 38 patients who had undergone laparoscopy for ASBO, performed by a single surgeon at our institution, due to adhesions (30 patients), internal hernias (five patients), midgut malrotation (one patient), ileo-ileal intussusception (one patient), and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome (one patient) from 2012 to 2020. Data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical records (EMR) for the following parameters of each individual patient: age, sex, clinical presentation, preoperative investigation findings, final diagnosis, surgical details, operating time, time to postoperative oral feeds, length of hospital stay, complications, recurrences, and time taken to resume normal activity. A preoperative abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) was performed in all the cases. Patients with peritonitis and septic shock were excluded from the study.  Results: The mean age of the 38 patients was 58 years (ranged between 33 and 83 years) with a standard deviation (SD) of 16.5. The mean age of the female patients in the study was 60.5 years with an SD of 16.6, while the mean age of the male patients was 54.9 years (SD = 16.2). The age difference between male and female patients in the study was not statistically significant (p = 0.36). The mean operating time was 74.4 minutes (range: 60-90 minutes, with an SD of 7.2). The mean time to oral liquid/soft diet was 2.5 days. The mean postoperative stay was 5.7 days. Three patients (8%) underwent conversion to open surgery, out of which two patients had multiple complex bowel-to-bowel and bowel-to-parietes adhesions, and in one patient, massive distension of small bowel caused technical difficulties. Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of ASBO is feasible, effective, and safe. Optimum surgical techniques, the surgeon's experience with the procedure, and stringent patient selection criteria enable a high probability of success. Cureus 2021-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8592819/ /pubmed/34804685 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18828 Text en Copyright © 2021, Harvitkar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology
Harvitkar, Rafique Umer
Kumar, Peri Harish
Joshi, Abhijit
Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction?
title Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction?
title_full Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction?
title_fullStr Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction?
title_full_unstemmed Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction?
title_short Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction?
title_sort role of laparoscopy in the surgical management of acute small bowel obstruction: fact or fiction?
topic Gastroenterology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34804685
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18828
work_keys_str_mv AT harvitkarrafiqueumer roleoflaparoscopyinthesurgicalmanagementofacutesmallbowelobstructionfactorfiction
AT kumarperiharish roleoflaparoscopyinthesurgicalmanagementofacutesmallbowelobstructionfactorfiction
AT joshiabhijit roleoflaparoscopyinthesurgicalmanagementofacutesmallbowelobstructionfactorfiction