Cargando…
A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
INTRODUCTION: The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) with clonoSEQ(®) can be used in the assessment of B-cell lymphoid tumor burden throughout treatment with accuracy, sensitivity and standardization when compared to traditional cytomorphology. With the approval of novel treatments, stand...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34480748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x |
_version_ | 1784599647425134592 |
---|---|
author | Walzer, Stefan Krenberger, Sebastian Vollmer, Lutz Hewitt, Tony Eckert, Benjamin |
author_facet | Walzer, Stefan Krenberger, Sebastian Vollmer, Lutz Hewitt, Tony Eckert, Benjamin |
author_sort | Walzer, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) with clonoSEQ(®) can be used in the assessment of B-cell lymphoid tumor burden throughout treatment with accuracy, sensitivity and standardization when compared to traditional cytomorphology. With the approval of novel treatments, standardized MRD assessment with improved performance is increasingly important. The aim of this analysis is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of MRD testing with clonoSEQ(®) compared to no MRD testing for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) on maintenance therapy in Germany. METHODS: The cost impact of clonoSEQ(®) was analyzed from the German statutory insurance perspective. Clinical data were derived from the literature and expert opinions. Cost input was utilized based on publicly available data and literature. Patients in the MRD arm were tested every 6 months. The deterministic Markov model consists of six health states, and every patient begins at the start of maintenance. Included therapies are lenalidomide for maintenance and carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapse. RESULTS: For a time horizon of 10 years, the deterministic cost impact analysis shows total cost of €279,483 for patients using clonoSEQ(®) in comparison to €356,623 for simulated patients without MRD testing. The main drivers of the cost differences are saved cost of drug holiday. The savings per patient in 1 year are €18,396. Savings after 3 years are €69,991 per patient. Savings after 10 years are €77,140 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the underlying model, clonoSEQ(®) can support German health insurance funds to use high-cost drugs more efficiently in the treatment of myeloma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8593124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85931242021-12-02 A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany Walzer, Stefan Krenberger, Sebastian Vollmer, Lutz Hewitt, Tony Eckert, Benjamin Oncol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) with clonoSEQ(®) can be used in the assessment of B-cell lymphoid tumor burden throughout treatment with accuracy, sensitivity and standardization when compared to traditional cytomorphology. With the approval of novel treatments, standardized MRD assessment with improved performance is increasingly important. The aim of this analysis is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of MRD testing with clonoSEQ(®) compared to no MRD testing for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) on maintenance therapy in Germany. METHODS: The cost impact of clonoSEQ(®) was analyzed from the German statutory insurance perspective. Clinical data were derived from the literature and expert opinions. Cost input was utilized based on publicly available data and literature. Patients in the MRD arm were tested every 6 months. The deterministic Markov model consists of six health states, and every patient begins at the start of maintenance. Included therapies are lenalidomide for maintenance and carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapse. RESULTS: For a time horizon of 10 years, the deterministic cost impact analysis shows total cost of €279,483 for patients using clonoSEQ(®) in comparison to €356,623 for simulated patients without MRD testing. The main drivers of the cost differences are saved cost of drug holiday. The savings per patient in 1 year are €18,396. Savings after 3 years are €69,991 per patient. Savings after 10 years are €77,140 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the underlying model, clonoSEQ(®) can support German health insurance funds to use high-cost drugs more efficiently in the treatment of myeloma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x. Springer Healthcare 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8593124/ /pubmed/34480748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Walzer, Stefan Krenberger, Sebastian Vollmer, Lutz Hewitt, Tony Eckert, Benjamin A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany |
title | A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany |
title_full | A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany |
title_fullStr | A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany |
title_short | A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany |
title_sort | cost impact analysis of clonoseq(®) as a valid and ce-certified minimal residual disease (mrd) diagnostic compared to no mrd testing in multiple myeloma in germany |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34480748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walzerstefan acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT krenbergersebastian acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT vollmerlutz acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT hewitttony acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT eckertbenjamin acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT walzerstefan costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT krenbergersebastian costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT vollmerlutz costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT hewitttony costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany AT eckertbenjamin costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany |