Cargando…

A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany

INTRODUCTION: The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) with clonoSEQ(®) can be used in the assessment of B-cell lymphoid tumor burden throughout treatment with accuracy, sensitivity and standardization when compared to traditional cytomorphology. With the approval of novel treatments, stand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walzer, Stefan, Krenberger, Sebastian, Vollmer, Lutz, Hewitt, Tony, Eckert, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34480748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x
_version_ 1784599647425134592
author Walzer, Stefan
Krenberger, Sebastian
Vollmer, Lutz
Hewitt, Tony
Eckert, Benjamin
author_facet Walzer, Stefan
Krenberger, Sebastian
Vollmer, Lutz
Hewitt, Tony
Eckert, Benjamin
author_sort Walzer, Stefan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) with clonoSEQ(®) can be used in the assessment of B-cell lymphoid tumor burden throughout treatment with accuracy, sensitivity and standardization when compared to traditional cytomorphology. With the approval of novel treatments, standardized MRD assessment with improved performance is increasingly important. The aim of this analysis is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of MRD testing with clonoSEQ(®) compared to no MRD testing for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) on maintenance therapy in Germany. METHODS: The cost impact of clonoSEQ(®) was analyzed from the German statutory insurance perspective. Clinical data were derived from the literature and expert opinions. Cost input was utilized based on publicly available data and literature. Patients in the MRD arm were tested every 6 months. The deterministic Markov model consists of six health states, and every patient begins at the start of maintenance. Included therapies are lenalidomide for maintenance and carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapse. RESULTS: For a time horizon of 10 years, the deterministic cost impact analysis shows total cost of €279,483 for patients using clonoSEQ(®) in comparison to €356,623 for simulated patients without MRD testing. The main drivers of the cost differences are saved cost of drug holiday. The savings per patient in 1 year are €18,396. Savings after 3 years are €69,991 per patient. Savings after 10 years are €77,140 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the underlying model, clonoSEQ(®) can support German health insurance funds to use high-cost drugs more efficiently in the treatment of myeloma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8593124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85931242021-12-02 A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany Walzer, Stefan Krenberger, Sebastian Vollmer, Lutz Hewitt, Tony Eckert, Benjamin Oncol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) with clonoSEQ(®) can be used in the assessment of B-cell lymphoid tumor burden throughout treatment with accuracy, sensitivity and standardization when compared to traditional cytomorphology. With the approval of novel treatments, standardized MRD assessment with improved performance is increasingly important. The aim of this analysis is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of MRD testing with clonoSEQ(®) compared to no MRD testing for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) on maintenance therapy in Germany. METHODS: The cost impact of clonoSEQ(®) was analyzed from the German statutory insurance perspective. Clinical data were derived from the literature and expert opinions. Cost input was utilized based on publicly available data and literature. Patients in the MRD arm were tested every 6 months. The deterministic Markov model consists of six health states, and every patient begins at the start of maintenance. Included therapies are lenalidomide for maintenance and carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapse. RESULTS: For a time horizon of 10 years, the deterministic cost impact analysis shows total cost of €279,483 for patients using clonoSEQ(®) in comparison to €356,623 for simulated patients without MRD testing. The main drivers of the cost differences are saved cost of drug holiday. The savings per patient in 1 year are €18,396. Savings after 3 years are €69,991 per patient. Savings after 10 years are €77,140 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the underlying model, clonoSEQ(®) can support German health insurance funds to use high-cost drugs more efficiently in the treatment of myeloma. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x. Springer Healthcare 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8593124/ /pubmed/34480748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Walzer, Stefan
Krenberger, Sebastian
Vollmer, Lutz
Hewitt, Tony
Eckert, Benjamin
A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
title A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
title_full A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
title_fullStr A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
title_full_unstemmed A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
title_short A Cost Impact Analysis of clonoSEQ(®) as a Valid and CE-Certified Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Diagnostic Compared to No MRD Testing in Multiple Myeloma in Germany
title_sort cost impact analysis of clonoseq(®) as a valid and ce-certified minimal residual disease (mrd) diagnostic compared to no mrd testing in multiple myeloma in germany
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34480748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40487-021-00169-x
work_keys_str_mv AT walzerstefan acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT krenbergersebastian acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT vollmerlutz acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT hewitttony acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT eckertbenjamin acostimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT walzerstefan costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT krenbergersebastian costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT vollmerlutz costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT hewitttony costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany
AT eckertbenjamin costimpactanalysisofclonoseqasavalidandcecertifiedminimalresidualdiseasemrddiagnosticcomparedtonomrdtestinginmultiplemyelomaingermany