Cargando…
Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting
BACKGROUND: Goals of care (GOC) conversations in the emergency department (ED) are often a brief discussion of code status rather than a patient-oriented dialogue. We aimed to develop a guide to facilitate conversations between ED clinicians and patients to elicit patient values and establish goals...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683211058082 |
_version_ | 1784599702954573824 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Laura E. Bellolio, M. Fernanda Dobler, Claudia C. Hargraves, Ian G. Pignolo, Robert J. Shaw, Kevin Strand, Jacob J. Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg Wilson, Michael E. Hess, Erik P. |
author_facet | Walker, Laura E. Bellolio, M. Fernanda Dobler, Claudia C. Hargraves, Ian G. Pignolo, Robert J. Shaw, Kevin Strand, Jacob J. Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg Wilson, Michael E. Hess, Erik P. |
author_sort | Walker, Laura E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Goals of care (GOC) conversations in the emergency department (ED) are often a brief discussion of code status rather than a patient-oriented dialogue. We aimed to develop a guide to facilitate conversations between ED clinicians and patients to elicit patient values and establish goals for end-of-life care, while maintaining ED efficiency. Paths of ED Care, a conversation guide, is the product of this work. DESIGN: A multidisciplinary/multispecialty group used recommended practices to adapt a GOC conversation guide for ED patients. ED clinicians used the guide and provided feedback on content, design, and usability. Patient-clinician interactions were recorded for discussion analysis, and both were surveyed to inform iterative refinement. A series of discussions with patient representatives, multidisciplinary clinicians, bioethicists, and health care designers yielded feedback. We used a process similar to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and provide comparison to these. RESULTS: A conversation guide, eight pages with each page 6 by 6 inches in dimension, uses patient-oriented prompts and includes seven sections: 1) evaluation of patient/family understanding of disease, 2) explanation of possible trajectories, 3) introduction to different pathways of care, 4) explanation of pathways, 5) assessment of understanding and concerns, 6) code status, and 7) personalized summary. LIMITATIONS: Recruitment of sufficient number of patients/providers to the project was the primary limitation. Methods are limited to qualitative analysis of guide creation and feasibility without quantitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Paths of ED Care is a guide to facilitate patient-centered shared decision making for ED patients, families, and clinicians regarding GOC. This may ensure care concordant with patients’ values and preferences. Use of the guide was well-received and facilitated meaningful conversations between patients and providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8593304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85933042021-11-17 Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting Walker, Laura E. Bellolio, M. Fernanda Dobler, Claudia C. Hargraves, Ian G. Pignolo, Robert J. Shaw, Kevin Strand, Jacob J. Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg Wilson, Michael E. Hess, Erik P. MDM Policy Pract Brief Report BACKGROUND: Goals of care (GOC) conversations in the emergency department (ED) are often a brief discussion of code status rather than a patient-oriented dialogue. We aimed to develop a guide to facilitate conversations between ED clinicians and patients to elicit patient values and establish goals for end-of-life care, while maintaining ED efficiency. Paths of ED Care, a conversation guide, is the product of this work. DESIGN: A multidisciplinary/multispecialty group used recommended practices to adapt a GOC conversation guide for ED patients. ED clinicians used the guide and provided feedback on content, design, and usability. Patient-clinician interactions were recorded for discussion analysis, and both were surveyed to inform iterative refinement. A series of discussions with patient representatives, multidisciplinary clinicians, bioethicists, and health care designers yielded feedback. We used a process similar to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards and provide comparison to these. RESULTS: A conversation guide, eight pages with each page 6 by 6 inches in dimension, uses patient-oriented prompts and includes seven sections: 1) evaluation of patient/family understanding of disease, 2) explanation of possible trajectories, 3) introduction to different pathways of care, 4) explanation of pathways, 5) assessment of understanding and concerns, 6) code status, and 7) personalized summary. LIMITATIONS: Recruitment of sufficient number of patients/providers to the project was the primary limitation. Methods are limited to qualitative analysis of guide creation and feasibility without quantitative analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Paths of ED Care is a guide to facilitate patient-centered shared decision making for ED patients, families, and clinicians regarding GOC. This may ensure care concordant with patients’ values and preferences. Use of the guide was well-received and facilitated meaningful conversations between patients and providers. SAGE Publications 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8593304/ /pubmed/34796267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683211058082 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Walker, Laura E. Bellolio, M. Fernanda Dobler, Claudia C. Hargraves, Ian G. Pignolo, Robert J. Shaw, Kevin Strand, Jacob J. Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg Wilson, Michael E. Hess, Erik P. Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting |
title | Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting |
title_full | Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting |
title_fullStr | Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting |
title_short | Paths of Emergency Department Care: Development of a Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Goals of Care Discussions in the Acute Setting |
title_sort | paths of emergency department care: development of a decision aid to facilitate shared decision making in goals of care discussions in the acute setting |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23814683211058082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerlaurae pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT belloliomfernanda pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT doblerclaudiac pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT hargravesiang pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT pignolorobertj pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT shawkevin pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT strandjacobj pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT thorsteinsdottirbjorg pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT wilsonmichaele pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting AT hesserikp pathsofemergencydepartmentcaredevelopmentofadecisionaidtofacilitateshareddecisionmakingingoalsofcarediscussionsintheacutesetting |