Cargando…
The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection
OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the Binary-Based Model (BBM), a new approach to Human Factors (HF) method selection. The BBM helps practitioners select the most appropriate HF methodology in relation to the complexity within the target system. BACKGROUND: There are over 200 HF methods available to th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820926875 |
_version_ | 1784599704383782912 |
---|---|
author | Holman, Matt Walker, Guy Lansdown, Terry Salmon, Paul Read, Gemma Stanton, Neville |
author_facet | Holman, Matt Walker, Guy Lansdown, Terry Salmon, Paul Read, Gemma Stanton, Neville |
author_sort | Holman, Matt |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the Binary-Based Model (BBM), a new approach to Human Factors (HF) method selection. The BBM helps practitioners select the most appropriate HF methodology in relation to the complexity within the target system. BACKGROUND: There are over 200 HF methods available to the practitioner and little guidance to help choose between them. METHOD: The BBM defines a HF “problem space” comprising three complexity attributes. HF problems can be rated against these attributes and located in the “problem space.” In addition, a similar HF “approach space” in which 66 predictive methods are rated according to their ability to confront those attributes is defined. These spaces are combined into a “utility space” in which problems and methods coexist. In the utility space, the match between HF problems and methods can be formally assessed. RESULTS: The method space is split into octants to establish broad groupings of methods distributed throughout the space. About 77% of the methods reside in Octant 1 which corresponds to problems with low levels of complexity. This demonstrates that most HF methods are suited to problems in low-complexity systems. CONCLUSION: The location of 77% of the rated methods in Octant 1 indicates that HF practitioners are underserved with methods for analysis of HF problems exhibiting high complexity. APPLICATION: The BBM can be used by multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate HF methodology for the problem under analysis. All the materials and analysis are placed in the public domain for modification and consensus building by the wider HF community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8593309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85933092021-11-17 The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection Holman, Matt Walker, Guy Lansdown, Terry Salmon, Paul Read, Gemma Stanton, Neville Hum Factors Methods and Skills OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the Binary-Based Model (BBM), a new approach to Human Factors (HF) method selection. The BBM helps practitioners select the most appropriate HF methodology in relation to the complexity within the target system. BACKGROUND: There are over 200 HF methods available to the practitioner and little guidance to help choose between them. METHOD: The BBM defines a HF “problem space” comprising three complexity attributes. HF problems can be rated against these attributes and located in the “problem space.” In addition, a similar HF “approach space” in which 66 predictive methods are rated according to their ability to confront those attributes is defined. These spaces are combined into a “utility space” in which problems and methods coexist. In the utility space, the match between HF problems and methods can be formally assessed. RESULTS: The method space is split into octants to establish broad groupings of methods distributed throughout the space. About 77% of the methods reside in Octant 1 which corresponds to problems with low levels of complexity. This demonstrates that most HF methods are suited to problems in low-complexity systems. CONCLUSION: The location of 77% of the rated methods in Octant 1 indicates that HF practitioners are underserved with methods for analysis of HF problems exhibiting high complexity. APPLICATION: The BBM can be used by multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate HF methodology for the problem under analysis. All the materials and analysis are placed in the public domain for modification and consensus building by the wider HF community. SAGE Publications 2020-06-18 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8593309/ /pubmed/32552004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820926875 Text en Copyright © 2020, The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Methods and Skills Holman, Matt Walker, Guy Lansdown, Terry Salmon, Paul Read, Gemma Stanton, Neville The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection |
title | The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection |
title_full | The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection |
title_fullStr | The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection |
title_short | The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection |
title_sort | binary-based model (bbm) for improved human factors method selection |
topic | Methods and Skills |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820926875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmanmatt thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT walkerguy thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT lansdownterry thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT salmonpaul thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT readgemma thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT stantonneville thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT holmanmatt binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT walkerguy binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT lansdownterry binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT salmonpaul binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT readgemma binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection AT stantonneville binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection |