Cargando…

The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection

OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the Binary-Based Model (BBM), a new approach to Human Factors (HF) method selection. The BBM helps practitioners select the most appropriate HF methodology in relation to the complexity within the target system. BACKGROUND: There are over 200 HF methods available to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holman, Matt, Walker, Guy, Lansdown, Terry, Salmon, Paul, Read, Gemma, Stanton, Neville
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820926875
_version_ 1784599704383782912
author Holman, Matt
Walker, Guy
Lansdown, Terry
Salmon, Paul
Read, Gemma
Stanton, Neville
author_facet Holman, Matt
Walker, Guy
Lansdown, Terry
Salmon, Paul
Read, Gemma
Stanton, Neville
author_sort Holman, Matt
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the Binary-Based Model (BBM), a new approach to Human Factors (HF) method selection. The BBM helps practitioners select the most appropriate HF methodology in relation to the complexity within the target system. BACKGROUND: There are over 200 HF methods available to the practitioner and little guidance to help choose between them. METHOD: The BBM defines a HF “problem space” comprising three complexity attributes. HF problems can be rated against these attributes and located in the “problem space.” In addition, a similar HF “approach space” in which 66 predictive methods are rated according to their ability to confront those attributes is defined. These spaces are combined into a “utility space” in which problems and methods coexist. In the utility space, the match between HF problems and methods can be formally assessed. RESULTS: The method space is split into octants to establish broad groupings of methods distributed throughout the space. About 77% of the methods reside in Octant 1 which corresponds to problems with low levels of complexity. This demonstrates that most HF methods are suited to problems in low-complexity systems. CONCLUSION: The location of 77% of the rated methods in Octant 1 indicates that HF practitioners are underserved with methods for analysis of HF problems exhibiting high complexity. APPLICATION: The BBM can be used by multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate HF methodology for the problem under analysis. All the materials and analysis are placed in the public domain for modification and consensus building by the wider HF community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8593309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85933092021-11-17 The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection Holman, Matt Walker, Guy Lansdown, Terry Salmon, Paul Read, Gemma Stanton, Neville Hum Factors Methods and Skills OBJECTIVE: This paper presents the Binary-Based Model (BBM), a new approach to Human Factors (HF) method selection. The BBM helps practitioners select the most appropriate HF methodology in relation to the complexity within the target system. BACKGROUND: There are over 200 HF methods available to the practitioner and little guidance to help choose between them. METHOD: The BBM defines a HF “problem space” comprising three complexity attributes. HF problems can be rated against these attributes and located in the “problem space.” In addition, a similar HF “approach space” in which 66 predictive methods are rated according to their ability to confront those attributes is defined. These spaces are combined into a “utility space” in which problems and methods coexist. In the utility space, the match between HF problems and methods can be formally assessed. RESULTS: The method space is split into octants to establish broad groupings of methods distributed throughout the space. About 77% of the methods reside in Octant 1 which corresponds to problems with low levels of complexity. This demonstrates that most HF methods are suited to problems in low-complexity systems. CONCLUSION: The location of 77% of the rated methods in Octant 1 indicates that HF practitioners are underserved with methods for analysis of HF problems exhibiting high complexity. APPLICATION: The BBM can be used by multidisciplinary teams to select the most appropriate HF methodology for the problem under analysis. All the materials and analysis are placed in the public domain for modification and consensus building by the wider HF community. SAGE Publications 2020-06-18 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8593309/ /pubmed/32552004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820926875 Text en Copyright © 2020, The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Methods and Skills
Holman, Matt
Walker, Guy
Lansdown, Terry
Salmon, Paul
Read, Gemma
Stanton, Neville
The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection
title The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection
title_full The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection
title_fullStr The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection
title_full_unstemmed The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection
title_short The Binary-Based Model (BBM) for Improved Human Factors Method Selection
title_sort binary-based model (bbm) for improved human factors method selection
topic Methods and Skills
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720820926875
work_keys_str_mv AT holmanmatt thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT walkerguy thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT lansdownterry thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT salmonpaul thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT readgemma thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT stantonneville thebinarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT holmanmatt binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT walkerguy binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT lansdownterry binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT salmonpaul binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT readgemma binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection
AT stantonneville binarybasedmodelbbmforimprovedhumanfactorsmethodselection