Cargando…

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative safety and efficacy of minimally invasive tubular surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. METHODS: A total of 161 consecutive patients with spinal metastasis between June 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 36 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Yunpeng, Shi, Xuedong, Mi, Chuan, Wang, Bing, Pan, Yuanxing, Lin, Yunfei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795525
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S332985
_version_ 1784599715983130624
author Cui, Yunpeng
Shi, Xuedong
Mi, Chuan
Wang, Bing
Pan, Yuanxing
Lin, Yunfei
author_facet Cui, Yunpeng
Shi, Xuedong
Mi, Chuan
Wang, Bing
Pan, Yuanxing
Lin, Yunfei
author_sort Cui, Yunpeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative safety and efficacy of minimally invasive tubular surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. METHODS: A total of 161 consecutive patients with spinal metastasis between June 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 36 patients were included in this study, 14 patients underwent minimally invasive tubular surgery (M), and 22 patients underwent conventional surgery (C). T-test and chi-square tests were used to evaluate demographic and perioperative data differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between M and C groups except for the SINS (p=0.002) and preoperative Alb (p=0.026). There was no significant difference in operative time and complications between M and C groups (p<0.05). The M group had less mean blood loss than the C group (1275 vs 718mL, p=0.045). Blood transfusion was comparable between the two groups (p<0.05). The mean amount and drainage time were lower than the C group (141 vs 873mL, p<0.001; 3.1 vs 7.0 days, P<0.001). The mean postoperative hospitalization of the M group was 8.8 days, which was lower than the C group (11.3 days, p=0.045). Sub-analysis showed that for patients with hyper-vascular tumor, the M group had less mean amount and time of drainage compared with the C group (p<0.05); for patients with hypo-vascular tumor, the mean blood loss and amount of blood transfusion were also reduced in M group (p<0.05). The mean blood loss and drainage time of patients with hypo-vascular tumors were less than patients with hyper-vascular tumors in the M group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, minimally invasive tubular surgery is safe and effective for patients with spinal metastasis. Patients with hypo-vascular tumors were more suitable for this technique with less blood loss, fewer blood transfusions, minor drainage, and shorter postoperative hospitalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8593345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85933452021-11-17 Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis Cui, Yunpeng Shi, Xuedong Mi, Chuan Wang, Bing Pan, Yuanxing Lin, Yunfei Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative safety and efficacy of minimally invasive tubular surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. METHODS: A total of 161 consecutive patients with spinal metastasis between June 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 36 patients were included in this study, 14 patients underwent minimally invasive tubular surgery (M), and 22 patients underwent conventional surgery (C). T-test and chi-square tests were used to evaluate demographic and perioperative data differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between M and C groups except for the SINS (p=0.002) and preoperative Alb (p=0.026). There was no significant difference in operative time and complications between M and C groups (p<0.05). The M group had less mean blood loss than the C group (1275 vs 718mL, p=0.045). Blood transfusion was comparable between the two groups (p<0.05). The mean amount and drainage time were lower than the C group (141 vs 873mL, p<0.001; 3.1 vs 7.0 days, P<0.001). The mean postoperative hospitalization of the M group was 8.8 days, which was lower than the C group (11.3 days, p=0.045). Sub-analysis showed that for patients with hyper-vascular tumor, the M group had less mean amount and time of drainage compared with the C group (p<0.05); for patients with hypo-vascular tumor, the mean blood loss and amount of blood transfusion were also reduced in M group (p<0.05). The mean blood loss and drainage time of patients with hypo-vascular tumors were less than patients with hyper-vascular tumors in the M group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In selected cases, minimally invasive tubular surgery is safe and effective for patients with spinal metastasis. Patients with hypo-vascular tumors were more suitable for this technique with less blood loss, fewer blood transfusions, minor drainage, and shorter postoperative hospitalization. Dove 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8593345/ /pubmed/34795525 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S332985 Text en © 2021 Cui et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Cui, Yunpeng
Shi, Xuedong
Mi, Chuan
Wang, Bing
Pan, Yuanxing
Lin, Yunfei
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis
title Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis
title_full Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis
title_fullStr Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis
title_short Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis
title_sort comparison of minimally invasive tubular surgery with conventional surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar metastasis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795525
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S332985
work_keys_str_mv AT cuiyunpeng comparisonofminimallyinvasivetubularsurgerywithconventionalsurgeryinthetreatmentofthoracolumbarmetastasis
AT shixuedong comparisonofminimallyinvasivetubularsurgerywithconventionalsurgeryinthetreatmentofthoracolumbarmetastasis
AT michuan comparisonofminimallyinvasivetubularsurgerywithconventionalsurgeryinthetreatmentofthoracolumbarmetastasis
AT wangbing comparisonofminimallyinvasivetubularsurgerywithconventionalsurgeryinthetreatmentofthoracolumbarmetastasis
AT panyuanxing comparisonofminimallyinvasivetubularsurgerywithconventionalsurgeryinthetreatmentofthoracolumbarmetastasis
AT linyunfei comparisonofminimallyinvasivetubularsurgerywithconventionalsurgeryinthetreatmentofthoracolumbarmetastasis