Cargando…
Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture
PURPOSE: People choose actions that maintain their moral self-regard. This paper explains how one’s moral actions influence moral self-regard. The moral threshold model (MTM) has been proposed by scholars and tested using a limited sample. However, whether the MTM is universally applicable among peo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795540 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S333364 |
_version_ | 1784599719236861952 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Weilong Sun, Binghai Zhou, Hui Fan, Liting Sun, Changkang Shao, Yanhong |
author_facet | Xiao, Weilong Sun, Binghai Zhou, Hui Fan, Liting Sun, Changkang Shao, Yanhong |
author_sort | Xiao, Weilong |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: People choose actions that maintain their moral self-regard. This paper explains how one’s moral actions influence moral self-regard. The moral threshold model (MTM) has been proposed by scholars and tested using a limited sample. However, whether the MTM is universally applicable among people is still unknown. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Our sample comprised 1761 individuals living in China, a collectivist culture, who were recruited to test the two main hypotheses of the MTM. Participants engaged in a hypothetical investment task. RESULTS: 1) When the beneficiary was a prosocial cause, participants showed stronger preferences for smaller guaranteed positive payouts over larger uncertain ones; 2) as compared to making decisions for charities, when a participant made decisions exclusively for themselves, the maximum potential benefit was more likely to influence participant behavior. CONCLUSION: The current study provides initial evidence for the validity of using the worst outcome avoidance (WOA) hypothesis of MTM among members of China’s collectivist culture, indicating that the WOA hypothesis of MTM may have universal application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8593355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85933552021-11-17 Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture Xiao, Weilong Sun, Binghai Zhou, Hui Fan, Liting Sun, Changkang Shao, Yanhong Psychol Res Behav Manag Original Research PURPOSE: People choose actions that maintain their moral self-regard. This paper explains how one’s moral actions influence moral self-regard. The moral threshold model (MTM) has been proposed by scholars and tested using a limited sample. However, whether the MTM is universally applicable among people is still unknown. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Our sample comprised 1761 individuals living in China, a collectivist culture, who were recruited to test the two main hypotheses of the MTM. Participants engaged in a hypothetical investment task. RESULTS: 1) When the beneficiary was a prosocial cause, participants showed stronger preferences for smaller guaranteed positive payouts over larger uncertain ones; 2) as compared to making decisions for charities, when a participant made decisions exclusively for themselves, the maximum potential benefit was more likely to influence participant behavior. CONCLUSION: The current study provides initial evidence for the validity of using the worst outcome avoidance (WOA) hypothesis of MTM among members of China’s collectivist culture, indicating that the WOA hypothesis of MTM may have universal application. Dove 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8593355/ /pubmed/34795540 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S333364 Text en © 2021 Xiao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Xiao, Weilong Sun, Binghai Zhou, Hui Fan, Liting Sun, Changkang Shao, Yanhong Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture |
title | Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture |
title_full | Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture |
title_fullStr | Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture |
title_full_unstemmed | Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture |
title_short | Moral Threshold Model is Universal? Initial Evidence from China’s Collectivist Culture |
title_sort | moral threshold model is universal? initial evidence from china’s collectivist culture |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795540 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S333364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaoweilong moralthresholdmodelisuniversalinitialevidencefromchinascollectivistculture AT sunbinghai moralthresholdmodelisuniversalinitialevidencefromchinascollectivistculture AT zhouhui moralthresholdmodelisuniversalinitialevidencefromchinascollectivistculture AT fanliting moralthresholdmodelisuniversalinitialevidencefromchinascollectivistculture AT sunchangkang moralthresholdmodelisuniversalinitialevidencefromchinascollectivistculture AT shaoyanhong moralthresholdmodelisuniversalinitialevidencefromchinascollectivistculture |