Cargando…

Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Condorelli, M., Bruzzone, M., Ceppi, M., Ferrari, A., Grinshpun, A., Hamy, A.S., de Azambuja, E., Carrasco, E., Peccatori, F.A., Di Meglio, A., Paluch-Shimon, S., Poorvu, P.D., Venturelli, M., Rousset-Jablonski, C., Senechal, C., Livraghi, L., Ponzone, R., De Marchis, L., Pogoda, K., Sonnenblick, A., Villarreal-Garza, C., Córdoba, O., Teixeira, L., Clatot, F., Punie, K., Graffeo, R., Dieci, M.V., Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A., Duhoux, F.P., Puglisi, F., Ferreira, A.R., Blondeaux, E., Peretz-Yablonski, T., Caron, O., Saule, C., Ameye, L., Balmaña, J., Partridge, A.H., Azim, H.A., Demeestere, I., Lambertini, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100300
_version_ 1784599743380324352
author Condorelli, M.
Bruzzone, M.
Ceppi, M.
Ferrari, A.
Grinshpun, A.
Hamy, A.S.
de Azambuja, E.
Carrasco, E.
Peccatori, F.A.
Di Meglio, A.
Paluch-Shimon, S.
Poorvu, P.D.
Venturelli, M.
Rousset-Jablonski, C.
Senechal, C.
Livraghi, L.
Ponzone, R.
De Marchis, L.
Pogoda, K.
Sonnenblick, A.
Villarreal-Garza, C.
Córdoba, O.
Teixeira, L.
Clatot, F.
Punie, K.
Graffeo, R.
Dieci, M.V.
Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A.
Duhoux, F.P.
Puglisi, F.
Ferreira, A.R.
Blondeaux, E.
Peretz-Yablonski, T.
Caron, O.
Saule, C.
Ameye, L.
Balmaña, J.
Partridge, A.H.
Azim, H.A.
Demeestere, I.
Lambertini, M.
author_facet Condorelli, M.
Bruzzone, M.
Ceppi, M.
Ferrari, A.
Grinshpun, A.
Hamy, A.S.
de Azambuja, E.
Carrasco, E.
Peccatori, F.A.
Di Meglio, A.
Paluch-Shimon, S.
Poorvu, P.D.
Venturelli, M.
Rousset-Jablonski, C.
Senechal, C.
Livraghi, L.
Ponzone, R.
De Marchis, L.
Pogoda, K.
Sonnenblick, A.
Villarreal-Garza, C.
Córdoba, O.
Teixeira, L.
Clatot, F.
Punie, K.
Graffeo, R.
Dieci, M.V.
Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A.
Duhoux, F.P.
Puglisi, F.
Ferreira, A.R.
Blondeaux, E.
Peretz-Yablonski, T.
Caron, O.
Saule, C.
Ameye, L.
Balmaña, J.
Partridge, A.H.
Azim, H.A.
Demeestere, I.
Lambertini, M.
author_sort Condorelli, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤40 years with stage I-III breast cancer, between January 2000 and December 2012, harboring known germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients included in this analysis had a post-treatment pregnancy either achieved through use of ART (ART group) or naturally (non-ART group). ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Among the 1424 patients registered in the study, 168 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis, of whom 22 were in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Survivors in the ART group conceived at an older age compared with those in the non-ART group (median age: 39.7 versus 35.4 years, respectively). Women in the ART group experienced more delivery complications compared with those in the non-ART group (22.1% versus 4.1%, respectively). No other apparent differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between cohorts. The median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6 years) in the ART group and 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6 years) in the non-ART group. Two patients (9.1%) in the ART group experienced a disease-free survival event (specifically, a locoregional recurrence) compared with 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group. In the ART group, no patients deceased compared with 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. CONCLUSION: This study provides encouraging safety data on the use of ART in breast cancer survivors harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, when natural conception fails or when they opt for ART in order to carry out preimplantation genetic testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8593447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85934472021-11-22 Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer Condorelli, M. Bruzzone, M. Ceppi, M. Ferrari, A. Grinshpun, A. Hamy, A.S. de Azambuja, E. Carrasco, E. Peccatori, F.A. Di Meglio, A. Paluch-Shimon, S. Poorvu, P.D. Venturelli, M. Rousset-Jablonski, C. Senechal, C. Livraghi, L. Ponzone, R. De Marchis, L. Pogoda, K. Sonnenblick, A. Villarreal-Garza, C. Córdoba, O. Teixeira, L. Clatot, F. Punie, K. Graffeo, R. Dieci, M.V. Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A. Duhoux, F.P. Puglisi, F. Ferreira, A.R. Blondeaux, E. Peretz-Yablonski, T. Caron, O. Saule, C. Ameye, L. Balmaña, J. Partridge, A.H. Azim, H.A. Demeestere, I. Lambertini, M. ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤40 years with stage I-III breast cancer, between January 2000 and December 2012, harboring known germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients included in this analysis had a post-treatment pregnancy either achieved through use of ART (ART group) or naturally (non-ART group). ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Among the 1424 patients registered in the study, 168 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis, of whom 22 were in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Survivors in the ART group conceived at an older age compared with those in the non-ART group (median age: 39.7 versus 35.4 years, respectively). Women in the ART group experienced more delivery complications compared with those in the non-ART group (22.1% versus 4.1%, respectively). No other apparent differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between cohorts. The median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6 years) in the ART group and 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6 years) in the non-ART group. Two patients (9.1%) in the ART group experienced a disease-free survival event (specifically, a locoregional recurrence) compared with 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group. In the ART group, no patients deceased compared with 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group. CONCLUSION: This study provides encouraging safety data on the use of ART in breast cancer survivors harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, when natural conception fails or when they opt for ART in order to carry out preimplantation genetic testing. Elsevier 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8593447/ /pubmed/34775302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100300 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Condorelli, M.
Bruzzone, M.
Ceppi, M.
Ferrari, A.
Grinshpun, A.
Hamy, A.S.
de Azambuja, E.
Carrasco, E.
Peccatori, F.A.
Di Meglio, A.
Paluch-Shimon, S.
Poorvu, P.D.
Venturelli, M.
Rousset-Jablonski, C.
Senechal, C.
Livraghi, L.
Ponzone, R.
De Marchis, L.
Pogoda, K.
Sonnenblick, A.
Villarreal-Garza, C.
Córdoba, O.
Teixeira, L.
Clatot, F.
Punie, K.
Graffeo, R.
Dieci, M.V.
Pérez-Fidalgo, J.A.
Duhoux, F.P.
Puglisi, F.
Ferreira, A.R.
Blondeaux, E.
Peretz-Yablonski, T.
Caron, O.
Saule, C.
Ameye, L.
Balmaña, J.
Partridge, A.H.
Azim, H.A.
Demeestere, I.
Lambertini, M.
Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer
title Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer
title_full Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer
title_fullStr Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer
title_short Safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer
title_sort safety of assisted reproductive techniques in young women harboring germline pathogenic variants in brca1/2 with a pregnancy after prior history of breast cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100300
work_keys_str_mv AT condorellim safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT bruzzonem safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT ceppim safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT ferraria safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT grinshpuna safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT hamyas safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT deazambujae safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT carrascoe safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT peccatorifa safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT dimeglioa safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT paluchshimons safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT poorvupd safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT venturellim safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT roussetjablonskic safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT senechalc safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT livraghil safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT ponzoner safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT demarchisl safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT pogodak safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT sonnenblicka safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT villarrealgarzac safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT cordobao safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT teixeiral safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT clatotf safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT puniek safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT graffeor safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT diecimv safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT perezfidalgoja safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT duhouxfp safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT puglisif safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT ferreiraar safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT blondeauxe safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT peretzyablonskit safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT carono safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT saulec safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT ameyel safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT balmanaj safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT partridgeah safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT azimha safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT demeesterei safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer
AT lambertinim safetyofassistedreproductivetechniquesinyoungwomenharboringgermlinepathogenicvariantsinbrca12withapregnancyafterpriorhistoryofbreastcancer