Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta(Ⓡ) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. METHODS: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Gwang Ha, Lee, Hang Lak, Joo, Moon Kyung, Park, Hong Jun, Jung, Sung Woo, Lee, Ok-Jae, Kim, Hyungkil, Chun, Hoon Jai, Lee, Soo Teik, Kim, Ji Won, Jeon, Han Ho, Chung, Il-Kwun, Kim, Hyun-Soo, Lee, Dong Ho, Kim, Kyoung-Oh, Lim, Yun Jeong, Park, Seun-Ja, Cho, Soo-Jeong, Kim, Byung-Wook, Ko, Kwang Hyun, Jeon, Seong Woo, Kim, Jae Gyu, Sung, In-Kyung, Kim, Tae Nyeun, Sung, Jae Kyu, Park, Jong-Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827990
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl20338
_version_ 1784599752793391104
author Kim, Gwang Ha
Lee, Hang Lak
Joo, Moon Kyung
Park, Hong Jun
Jung, Sung Woo
Lee, Ok-Jae
Kim, Hyungkil
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Soo Teik
Kim, Ji Won
Jeon, Han Ho
Chung, Il-Kwun
Kim, Hyun-Soo
Lee, Dong Ho
Kim, Kyoung-Oh
Lim, Yun Jeong
Park, Seun-Ja
Cho, Soo-Jeong
Kim, Byung-Wook
Ko, Kwang Hyun
Jeon, Seong Woo
Kim, Jae Gyu
Sung, In-Kyung
Kim, Tae Nyeun
Sung, Jae Kyu
Park, Jong-Jae
author_facet Kim, Gwang Ha
Lee, Hang Lak
Joo, Moon Kyung
Park, Hong Jun
Jung, Sung Woo
Lee, Ok-Jae
Kim, Hyungkil
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Soo Teik
Kim, Ji Won
Jeon, Han Ho
Chung, Il-Kwun
Kim, Hyun-Soo
Lee, Dong Ho
Kim, Kyoung-Oh
Lim, Yun Jeong
Park, Seun-Ja
Cho, Soo-Jeong
Kim, Byung-Wook
Ko, Kwang Hyun
Jeon, Seong Woo
Kim, Jae Gyu
Sung, In-Kyung
Kim, Tae Nyeun
Sung, Jae Kyu
Park, Jong-Jae
author_sort Kim, Gwang Ha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta(Ⓡ) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. METHODS: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups AD-203 twice daily or Mucosta(Ⓡ) thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was −4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and −4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (Mucosta(Ⓡ)) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8593495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85934952021-12-01 Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study Kim, Gwang Ha Lee, Hang Lak Joo, Moon Kyung Park, Hong Jun Jung, Sung Woo Lee, Ok-Jae Kim, Hyungkil Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Soo Teik Kim, Ji Won Jeon, Han Ho Chung, Il-Kwun Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Dong Ho Kim, Kyoung-Oh Lim, Yun Jeong Park, Seun-Ja Cho, Soo-Jeong Kim, Byung-Wook Ko, Kwang Hyun Jeon, Seong Woo Kim, Jae Gyu Sung, In-Kyung Kim, Tae Nyeun Sung, Jae Kyu Park, Jong-Jae Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta(Ⓡ) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. METHODS: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups AD-203 twice daily or Mucosta(Ⓡ) thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was −4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and −4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (Mucosta(Ⓡ)) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2021-11-15 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8593495/ /pubmed/33827990 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl20338 Text en Copyright © Gut and Liver. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Gwang Ha
Lee, Hang Lak
Joo, Moon Kyung
Park, Hong Jun
Jung, Sung Woo
Lee, Ok-Jae
Kim, Hyungkil
Chun, Hoon Jai
Lee, Soo Teik
Kim, Ji Won
Jeon, Han Ho
Chung, Il-Kwun
Kim, Hyun-Soo
Lee, Dong Ho
Kim, Kyoung-Oh
Lim, Yun Jeong
Park, Seun-Ja
Cho, Soo-Jeong
Kim, Byung-Wook
Ko, Kwang Hyun
Jeon, Seong Woo
Kim, Jae Gyu
Sung, In-Kyung
Kim, Tae Nyeun
Sung, Jae Kyu
Park, Jong-Jae
Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
title Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
title_sort efficacy and safety of rebamipide versus its new formulation, ad-203, in patients with erosive gastritis: a randomized, double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827990
http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl20338
work_keys_str_mv AT kimgwangha efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT leehanglak efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT joomoonkyung efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT parkhongjun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT jungsungwoo efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT leeokjae efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kimhyungkil efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT chunhoonjai efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT leesooteik efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kimjiwon efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT jeonhanho efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT chungilkwun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kimhyunsoo efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT leedongho efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kimkyoungoh efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT limyunjeong efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT parkseunja efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT chosoojeong efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kimbyungwook efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kokwanghyun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT jeonseongwoo efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kimjaegyu efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT sunginkyung efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT kimtaenyeun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT sungjaekyu efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study
AT parkjongjae efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study