Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta(Ⓡ) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. METHODS: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial Office of Gut and Liver
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827990 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl20338 |
_version_ | 1784599752793391104 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Gwang Ha Lee, Hang Lak Joo, Moon Kyung Park, Hong Jun Jung, Sung Woo Lee, Ok-Jae Kim, Hyungkil Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Soo Teik Kim, Ji Won Jeon, Han Ho Chung, Il-Kwun Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Dong Ho Kim, Kyoung-Oh Lim, Yun Jeong Park, Seun-Ja Cho, Soo-Jeong Kim, Byung-Wook Ko, Kwang Hyun Jeon, Seong Woo Kim, Jae Gyu Sung, In-Kyung Kim, Tae Nyeun Sung, Jae Kyu Park, Jong-Jae |
author_facet | Kim, Gwang Ha Lee, Hang Lak Joo, Moon Kyung Park, Hong Jun Jung, Sung Woo Lee, Ok-Jae Kim, Hyungkil Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Soo Teik Kim, Ji Won Jeon, Han Ho Chung, Il-Kwun Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Dong Ho Kim, Kyoung-Oh Lim, Yun Jeong Park, Seun-Ja Cho, Soo-Jeong Kim, Byung-Wook Ko, Kwang Hyun Jeon, Seong Woo Kim, Jae Gyu Sung, In-Kyung Kim, Tae Nyeun Sung, Jae Kyu Park, Jong-Jae |
author_sort | Kim, Gwang Ha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta(Ⓡ) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. METHODS: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups AD-203 twice daily or Mucosta(Ⓡ) thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was −4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and −4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (Mucosta(Ⓡ)) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8593495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Editorial Office of Gut and Liver |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85934952021-12-01 Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study Kim, Gwang Ha Lee, Hang Lak Joo, Moon Kyung Park, Hong Jun Jung, Sung Woo Lee, Ok-Jae Kim, Hyungkil Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Soo Teik Kim, Ji Won Jeon, Han Ho Chung, Il-Kwun Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Dong Ho Kim, Kyoung-Oh Lim, Yun Jeong Park, Seun-Ja Cho, Soo-Jeong Kim, Byung-Wook Ko, Kwang Hyun Jeon, Seong Woo Kim, Jae Gyu Sung, In-Kyung Kim, Tae Nyeun Sung, Jae Kyu Park, Jong-Jae Gut Liver Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of Mucosta(Ⓡ) (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis. METHODS: This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups AD-203 twice daily or Mucosta(Ⓡ) thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; Mucosta(Ⓡ), n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was −4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], –13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and −4.44% (95% CI, –13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 Mucosta(Ⓡ)-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (Mucosta(Ⓡ)) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis. Editorial Office of Gut and Liver 2021-11-15 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8593495/ /pubmed/33827990 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl20338 Text en Copyright © Gut and Liver. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Gwang Ha Lee, Hang Lak Joo, Moon Kyung Park, Hong Jun Jung, Sung Woo Lee, Ok-Jae Kim, Hyungkil Chun, Hoon Jai Lee, Soo Teik Kim, Ji Won Jeon, Han Ho Chung, Il-Kwun Kim, Hyun-Soo Lee, Dong Ho Kim, Kyoung-Oh Lim, Yun Jeong Park, Seun-Ja Cho, Soo-Jeong Kim, Byung-Wook Ko, Kwang Hyun Jeon, Seong Woo Kim, Jae Gyu Sung, In-Kyung Kim, Tae Nyeun Sung, Jae Kyu Park, Jong-Jae Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of rebamipide versus its new formulation, ad-203, in patients with erosive gastritis: a randomized, double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827990 http://dx.doi.org/10.5009/gnl20338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimgwangha efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT leehanglak efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT joomoonkyung efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT parkhongjun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT jungsungwoo efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT leeokjae efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kimhyungkil efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT chunhoonjai efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT leesooteik efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kimjiwon efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT jeonhanho efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT chungilkwun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kimhyunsoo efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT leedongho efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kimkyoungoh efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT limyunjeong efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT parkseunja efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT chosoojeong efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kimbyungwook efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kokwanghyun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT jeonseongwoo efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kimjaegyu efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT sunginkyung efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT kimtaenyeun efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT sungjaekyu efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study AT parkjongjae efficacyandsafetyofrebamipideversusitsnewformulationad203inpatientswitherosivegastritisarandomizeddoubleblindactivecontrolnoninferioritymulticenterphase3study |