Cargando…

Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept

PURPOSE: To characterize the changes in contrast sensitivity (CS) and retinal anatomy in patients with center involving diabetic macular edema (CDME) measured from baseline to post-loading doses of aflibercept. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single center, prospective, open-label, non-controlled evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nixon, Donald R, Flinn, Nicholas, Enderlein, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S338478
_version_ 1784599805068050432
author Nixon, Donald R
Flinn, Nicholas
Enderlein, Claudia
author_facet Nixon, Donald R
Flinn, Nicholas
Enderlein, Claudia
author_sort Nixon, Donald R
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterize the changes in contrast sensitivity (CS) and retinal anatomy in patients with center involving diabetic macular edema (CDME) measured from baseline to post-loading doses of aflibercept. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single center, prospective, open-label, non-controlled evaluation of five aflibercept intravitreal injections for treatment of CDME over a 16-week period. One eye in each of the forty patients will receive aflibercept every 4 weeks. Subject testing includes measurements of central retinal thickness (CRT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Pelli–Robson (PR) CS, and CamBlobs (CB) CS at 20 weeks post baseline. RESULTS: A total of 40 eyes from 40 patients with CDME were analyzed. The mean age was 62.9 ±10.6 years and 55% were male. At baseline, CRT was 365 ±94.6µm with logMAR BCVA 0.25±0.20. CS PR at baseline was 1.46±0.13 logCS compared to the normal population 1.79±0.10 logCS (P=<0.01), and the CS CB was 1.55±0.16 logCS compared to 1.92±0.08 logCS in the normal population (P=<0.01). At the completion of the study, CRT was decreased to 289 ±43.7µm (P=<0.001), and the logMAR BCVA improved to 0.18±0.02 (P=<0.05). At the same point the CS PR was 1.52±0.16 and CS CB was 1.62±0.16 logCS. At the end of the study 85% of eyes obtained BCVA of 0.3 logMAR or better. There was a reduction from baseline of 82.5% to 57.5% in the number of patients that had a CS that was two standard deviations below the mean. The greatest improvement in CS was associated with those patients that had the greatest reduction in CRT. CONCLUSION: CS impairment in patients with CDME is significant. Although treatment can be associated with improvement, there still remains a group with decreased CS that could impact activities of daily living. Earlier intervention using reduction in CS as a metric may be associated with reduced residual deficit associated with treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8593693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85936932021-11-17 Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept Nixon, Donald R Flinn, Nicholas Enderlein, Claudia Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To characterize the changes in contrast sensitivity (CS) and retinal anatomy in patients with center involving diabetic macular edema (CDME) measured from baseline to post-loading doses of aflibercept. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single center, prospective, open-label, non-controlled evaluation of five aflibercept intravitreal injections for treatment of CDME over a 16-week period. One eye in each of the forty patients will receive aflibercept every 4 weeks. Subject testing includes measurements of central retinal thickness (CRT), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Pelli–Robson (PR) CS, and CamBlobs (CB) CS at 20 weeks post baseline. RESULTS: A total of 40 eyes from 40 patients with CDME were analyzed. The mean age was 62.9 ±10.6 years and 55% were male. At baseline, CRT was 365 ±94.6µm with logMAR BCVA 0.25±0.20. CS PR at baseline was 1.46±0.13 logCS compared to the normal population 1.79±0.10 logCS (P=<0.01), and the CS CB was 1.55±0.16 logCS compared to 1.92±0.08 logCS in the normal population (P=<0.01). At the completion of the study, CRT was decreased to 289 ±43.7µm (P=<0.001), and the logMAR BCVA improved to 0.18±0.02 (P=<0.05). At the same point the CS PR was 1.52±0.16 and CS CB was 1.62±0.16 logCS. At the end of the study 85% of eyes obtained BCVA of 0.3 logMAR or better. There was a reduction from baseline of 82.5% to 57.5% in the number of patients that had a CS that was two standard deviations below the mean. The greatest improvement in CS was associated with those patients that had the greatest reduction in CRT. CONCLUSION: CS impairment in patients with CDME is significant. Although treatment can be associated with improvement, there still remains a group with decreased CS that could impact activities of daily living. Earlier intervention using reduction in CS as a metric may be associated with reduced residual deficit associated with treatment. Dove 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8593693/ /pubmed/34795475 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S338478 Text en © 2021 Nixon et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Nixon, Donald R
Flinn, Nicholas
Enderlein, Claudia
Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept
title Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept
title_full Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept
title_fullStr Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept
title_full_unstemmed Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept
title_short Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept
title_sort contrast sensitivity changes in center involving diabetic macular edema treated with aflibercept
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795475
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S338478
work_keys_str_mv AT nixondonaldr contrastsensitivitychangesincenterinvolvingdiabeticmacularedematreatedwithaflibercept
AT flinnnicholas contrastsensitivitychangesincenterinvolvingdiabeticmacularedematreatedwithaflibercept
AT enderleinclaudia contrastsensitivitychangesincenterinvolvingdiabeticmacularedematreatedwithaflibercept