Cargando…
Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on rout...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006568 |
_version_ | 1784599812223533056 |
---|---|
author | Vassallo, Amy Dunbar, Kimberly Ajuwon, Busayo Lowbridge, Christopher Kirk, Martyn King, Catherine Sheel, Meru |
author_facet | Vassallo, Amy Dunbar, Kimberly Ajuwon, Busayo Lowbridge, Christopher Kirk, Martyn King, Catherine Sheel, Meru |
author_sort | Vassallo, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on routine immunisation and health systems during the modern era of polio eradication. METHODS: We searched nine databases for studies reporting on polio SIAs and immunisation coverage, financial investment, workforce and health services delivery. We conducted a narrative synthesis of evidence. Records prior to 1994, animal, modelling or case studies data were excluded. RESULTS: 20/1637 unique records were included. Data on vaccine coverage were included in 70% (14/20) studies, workforce in 65% (13/20) and health services delivery in 85% (17/20). SIAs positively contributed to vaccination uptake of non-polio vaccines in seven studies, neutral in three and negative in one. Some polio SIAs contributed to workforce strengthening through training and capacity building. Polio SIAs were accompanied with increased social mobilisation and community awareness building confidence in vaccination programmes. Included studies were programmatic in nature and contained variable data, thus could not be justly critically appraised. CONCLUSION: Polio SIAs are successful at increasing polio vaccine coverage, but the resources and infrastructures were not always utilised for delivery of non-polio vaccines and integration into routine service delivery. We found a gap in standardised tools to evaluate SIAs, which can then inform service integration. Our study provides data to inform SIAs evaluations, and provides important considerations for COVID-19 vaccine roll-out to strengthen health systems. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020152195. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8593720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85937202021-11-24 Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review Vassallo, Amy Dunbar, Kimberly Ajuwon, Busayo Lowbridge, Christopher Kirk, Martyn King, Catherine Sheel, Meru BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on routine immunisation and health systems during the modern era of polio eradication. METHODS: We searched nine databases for studies reporting on polio SIAs and immunisation coverage, financial investment, workforce and health services delivery. We conducted a narrative synthesis of evidence. Records prior to 1994, animal, modelling or case studies data were excluded. RESULTS: 20/1637 unique records were included. Data on vaccine coverage were included in 70% (14/20) studies, workforce in 65% (13/20) and health services delivery in 85% (17/20). SIAs positively contributed to vaccination uptake of non-polio vaccines in seven studies, neutral in three and negative in one. Some polio SIAs contributed to workforce strengthening through training and capacity building. Polio SIAs were accompanied with increased social mobilisation and community awareness building confidence in vaccination programmes. Included studies were programmatic in nature and contained variable data, thus could not be justly critically appraised. CONCLUSION: Polio SIAs are successful at increasing polio vaccine coverage, but the resources and infrastructures were not always utilised for delivery of non-polio vaccines and integration into routine service delivery. We found a gap in standardised tools to evaluate SIAs, which can then inform service integration. Our study provides data to inform SIAs evaluations, and provides important considerations for COVID-19 vaccine roll-out to strengthen health systems. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020152195. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8593720/ /pubmed/34776411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006568 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vassallo, Amy Dunbar, Kimberly Ajuwon, Busayo Lowbridge, Christopher Kirk, Martyn King, Catherine Sheel, Meru Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review |
title | Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review |
title_full | Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review |
title_short | Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review |
title_sort | assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vassalloamy assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview AT dunbarkimberly assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview AT ajuwonbusayo assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview AT lowbridgechristopher assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview AT kirkmartyn assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview AT kingcatherine assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview AT sheelmeru assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview |