Cargando…

Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on rout...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vassallo, Amy, Dunbar, Kimberly, Ajuwon, Busayo, Lowbridge, Christopher, Kirk, Martyn, King, Catherine, Sheel, Meru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006568
_version_ 1784599812223533056
author Vassallo, Amy
Dunbar, Kimberly
Ajuwon, Busayo
Lowbridge, Christopher
Kirk, Martyn
King, Catherine
Sheel, Meru
author_facet Vassallo, Amy
Dunbar, Kimberly
Ajuwon, Busayo
Lowbridge, Christopher
Kirk, Martyn
King, Catherine
Sheel, Meru
author_sort Vassallo, Amy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on routine immunisation and health systems during the modern era of polio eradication. METHODS: We searched nine databases for studies reporting on polio SIAs and immunisation coverage, financial investment, workforce and health services delivery. We conducted a narrative synthesis of evidence. Records prior to 1994, animal, modelling or case studies data were excluded. RESULTS: 20/1637 unique records were included. Data on vaccine coverage were included in 70% (14/20) studies, workforce in 65% (13/20) and health services delivery in 85% (17/20). SIAs positively contributed to vaccination uptake of non-polio vaccines in seven studies, neutral in three and negative in one. Some polio SIAs contributed to workforce strengthening through training and capacity building. Polio SIAs were accompanied with increased social mobilisation and community awareness building confidence in vaccination programmes. Included studies were programmatic in nature and contained variable data, thus could not be justly critically appraised. CONCLUSION: Polio SIAs are successful at increasing polio vaccine coverage, but the resources and infrastructures were not always utilised for delivery of non-polio vaccines and integration into routine service delivery. We found a gap in standardised tools to evaluate SIAs, which can then inform service integration. Our study provides data to inform SIAs evaluations, and provides important considerations for COVID-19 vaccine roll-out to strengthen health systems. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020152195.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8593720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85937202021-11-24 Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review Vassallo, Amy Dunbar, Kimberly Ajuwon, Busayo Lowbridge, Christopher Kirk, Martyn King, Catherine Sheel, Meru BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on routine immunisation and health systems during the modern era of polio eradication. METHODS: We searched nine databases for studies reporting on polio SIAs and immunisation coverage, financial investment, workforce and health services delivery. We conducted a narrative synthesis of evidence. Records prior to 1994, animal, modelling or case studies data were excluded. RESULTS: 20/1637 unique records were included. Data on vaccine coverage were included in 70% (14/20) studies, workforce in 65% (13/20) and health services delivery in 85% (17/20). SIAs positively contributed to vaccination uptake of non-polio vaccines in seven studies, neutral in three and negative in one. Some polio SIAs contributed to workforce strengthening through training and capacity building. Polio SIAs were accompanied with increased social mobilisation and community awareness building confidence in vaccination programmes. Included studies were programmatic in nature and contained variable data, thus could not be justly critically appraised. CONCLUSION: Polio SIAs are successful at increasing polio vaccine coverage, but the resources and infrastructures were not always utilised for delivery of non-polio vaccines and integration into routine service delivery. We found a gap in standardised tools to evaluate SIAs, which can then inform service integration. Our study provides data to inform SIAs evaluations, and provides important considerations for COVID-19 vaccine roll-out to strengthen health systems. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020152195. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8593720/ /pubmed/34776411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006568 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Vassallo, Amy
Dunbar, Kimberly
Ajuwon, Busayo
Lowbridge, Christopher
Kirk, Martyn
King, Catherine
Sheel, Meru
Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
title Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
title_full Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
title_short Assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
title_sort assessing the impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on routine immunisation and health systems: a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006568
work_keys_str_mv AT vassalloamy assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview
AT dunbarkimberly assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview
AT ajuwonbusayo assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview
AT lowbridgechristopher assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview
AT kirkmartyn assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview
AT kingcatherine assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview
AT sheelmeru assessingtheimpactofpoliosupplementaryimmunisationactivitiesonroutineimmunisationandhealthsystemsasystematicreview