Cargando…
Biologics for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis: An Australian cost-utility analysis
BACKGROUND: Biologics are a good therapeutic option for severe, chronic plaque psoriasis; however, they come with significant cost to the health care system. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-utility analysis of outpatient biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, guselkumab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinum...
Autores principales: | Sun, Helen Y., Keller, Elena, Suresh, Harish, Sebaratnam, Deshan F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2021.06.004 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Annual biologic treatment cost for new and existing patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in Greece
por: Fragoulakis, Vassilis, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Cost-utility and budget impact analysis of adding-on apremilast to biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, an Iranian payer perspective
por: Zargaran, Marzieh, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Clinical utility of ixekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis
por: Sekhon, Sahil, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Clinical Utility of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
por: Light, Jeremy G, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Clinical Utility of Deucravacitinib for the Management of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
por: Jin, Joy Q, et al.
Publicado: (2023)