Cargando…
Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel
BACKGROUND: The physical sequelae of acne include erythema, hyperpigmentation, and scarring, which are highly burdensome for patients. Early, effective treatment can potentially limit and prevent sequelae development, but there is a need for guidance for and evidence of prevention-oriented managemen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2021.06.006 |
_version_ | 1784599819612848128 |
---|---|
author | Layton, Alison Alexis, Andrew Baldwin, Hilary Beissert, Stefan Bettoli, Vincenzo Del Rosso, James Dréno, Brigitte Gold, Linda Stein Harper, Julie Lynde, Charles Thiboutot, Diane Weiss, Jonathan Tan, Jerry |
author_facet | Layton, Alison Alexis, Andrew Baldwin, Hilary Beissert, Stefan Bettoli, Vincenzo Del Rosso, James Dréno, Brigitte Gold, Linda Stein Harper, Julie Lynde, Charles Thiboutot, Diane Weiss, Jonathan Tan, Jerry |
author_sort | Layton, Alison |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The physical sequelae of acne include erythema, hyperpigmentation, and scarring, which are highly burdensome for patients. Early, effective treatment can potentially limit and prevent sequelae development, but there is a need for guidance for and evidence of prevention-oriented management to improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify unmet needs of acne sequelae and generate expert recommendations to address gaps in clinical guidance. METHODS: The Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts panel of 13 dermatologists used a modified Delphi approach to achieve a consensus on the clinical aspects of acne sequelae. A consensus was defined as ≥75% of the dermatologists voting “agree” or “strongly agree.” All voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: The panel identified gaps in current guidance and made recommendations related to acne sequelae. These included identification and classification of sequelae, pertinent points to consider for patient consultations, and management aimed at reducing the development of sequelae. LIMITATIONS: The recommendations are based on expert opinion and made in the absence of high-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The identified gaps should help inform future research and guideline development for acne sequelae. The consensus-based recommendations should also support the process of consultations throughout the patient journey, helping to reduce the development and burden of acne sequelae through improved risk factor recognition, early discussion, and appropriate management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8593750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85937502021-11-22 Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel Layton, Alison Alexis, Andrew Baldwin, Hilary Beissert, Stefan Bettoli, Vincenzo Del Rosso, James Dréno, Brigitte Gold, Linda Stein Harper, Julie Lynde, Charles Thiboutot, Diane Weiss, Jonathan Tan, Jerry JAAD Int Original Article BACKGROUND: The physical sequelae of acne include erythema, hyperpigmentation, and scarring, which are highly burdensome for patients. Early, effective treatment can potentially limit and prevent sequelae development, but there is a need for guidance for and evidence of prevention-oriented management to improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To identify unmet needs of acne sequelae and generate expert recommendations to address gaps in clinical guidance. METHODS: The Personalizing Acne: Consensus of Experts panel of 13 dermatologists used a modified Delphi approach to achieve a consensus on the clinical aspects of acne sequelae. A consensus was defined as ≥75% of the dermatologists voting “agree” or “strongly agree.” All voting was electronic and blinded. RESULTS: The panel identified gaps in current guidance and made recommendations related to acne sequelae. These included identification and classification of sequelae, pertinent points to consider for patient consultations, and management aimed at reducing the development of sequelae. LIMITATIONS: The recommendations are based on expert opinion and made in the absence of high-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The identified gaps should help inform future research and guideline development for acne sequelae. The consensus-based recommendations should also support the process of consultations throughout the patient journey, helping to reduce the development and burden of acne sequelae through improved risk factor recognition, early discussion, and appropriate management. Elsevier 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8593750/ /pubmed/34816133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2021.06.006 Text en © 2021 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Layton, Alison Alexis, Andrew Baldwin, Hilary Beissert, Stefan Bettoli, Vincenzo Del Rosso, James Dréno, Brigitte Gold, Linda Stein Harper, Julie Lynde, Charles Thiboutot, Diane Weiss, Jonathan Tan, Jerry Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel |
title | Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel |
title_full | Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel |
title_fullStr | Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel |
title_short | Identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the Personalising Acne: Consensus of Experts panel |
title_sort | identifying gaps and providing recommendations to address shortcomings in the investigation of acne sequelae by the personalising acne: consensus of experts panel |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdin.2021.06.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laytonalison identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT alexisandrew identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT baldwinhilary identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT beissertstefan identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT bettolivincenzo identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT delrossojames identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT drenobrigitte identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT goldlindastein identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT harperjulie identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT lyndecharles identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT thiboutotdiane identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT weissjonathan identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel AT tanjerry identifyinggapsandprovidingrecommendationstoaddressshortcomingsintheinvestigationofacnesequelaebythepersonalisingacneconsensusofexpertspanel |