Cargando…

Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19

Background: The global coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic concerns all people, but has a specific effect on those who are expecting a baby during this time. The advice in the UK changed rapidly, with 14 different sets of national guidance issued within 1 month. Individual NHS Trusts released various gu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenfield, Mari, Payne-Gifford, Sophie, McKenzie, Gemma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.603744
_version_ 1784599881368731648
author Greenfield, Mari
Payne-Gifford, Sophie
McKenzie, Gemma
author_facet Greenfield, Mari
Payne-Gifford, Sophie
McKenzie, Gemma
author_sort Greenfield, Mari
collection PubMed
description Background: The global coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic concerns all people, but has a specific effect on those who are expecting a baby during this time. The advice in the UK changed rapidly, with 14 different sets of national guidance issued within 1 month. Individual NHS Trusts released various guidance relating to the withdrawal of homebirth services, the closure of birth centers, restrictions on the number of birth partners (if any) allowed during labor, and whether any visitors were allowed to attend after birth. With the landscape of maternity care changing so rapidly, research was carried out to provide real-time data to capture the lived experiences of expectant families. Methods: A mixed methods online survey was carried out over 2 weeks between 10th and 24th April 2020. The survey was open to those in the third trimester of pregnancy, those who had given birth since the beginning of the “lockdown” period in the UK, and the partners of pregnant women and people who were in these circumstances. The survey asked questions about how respondents' holistic antenatal experiences had been affected, whether their plans for birth had changed, and the effect of these changes on respondents' emotional wellbeing. Of the 1,700 responses received, 72 mentioned that they had seriously considered “freebirthing” (giving birth without a healthcare professional present). Findings: An analysis of the respondents' reasons for considering freebirth was conducted, finding that reasons for considering freebirth were complex and multifaceted. Lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, and queer women were more likely to have considered freebirth than heterosexual people (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Considering giving birth without a healthcare professional present is unusual in the Global North and represents an emerging field of study. The literature examining the reasons that people consider freebirth shows a variety of underlying motivations. A global pandemic represents a new factor in such considerations. The findings from this research can help inform maternity service planning in future crises.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8594025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85940252021-11-22 Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19 Greenfield, Mari Payne-Gifford, Sophie McKenzie, Gemma Front Glob Womens Health Global Women's Health Background: The global coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic concerns all people, but has a specific effect on those who are expecting a baby during this time. The advice in the UK changed rapidly, with 14 different sets of national guidance issued within 1 month. Individual NHS Trusts released various guidance relating to the withdrawal of homebirth services, the closure of birth centers, restrictions on the number of birth partners (if any) allowed during labor, and whether any visitors were allowed to attend after birth. With the landscape of maternity care changing so rapidly, research was carried out to provide real-time data to capture the lived experiences of expectant families. Methods: A mixed methods online survey was carried out over 2 weeks between 10th and 24th April 2020. The survey was open to those in the third trimester of pregnancy, those who had given birth since the beginning of the “lockdown” period in the UK, and the partners of pregnant women and people who were in these circumstances. The survey asked questions about how respondents' holistic antenatal experiences had been affected, whether their plans for birth had changed, and the effect of these changes on respondents' emotional wellbeing. Of the 1,700 responses received, 72 mentioned that they had seriously considered “freebirthing” (giving birth without a healthcare professional present). Findings: An analysis of the respondents' reasons for considering freebirth was conducted, finding that reasons for considering freebirth were complex and multifaceted. Lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, and queer women were more likely to have considered freebirth than heterosexual people (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Considering giving birth without a healthcare professional present is unusual in the Global North and represents an emerging field of study. The literature examining the reasons that people consider freebirth shows a variety of underlying motivations. A global pandemic represents a new factor in such considerations. The findings from this research can help inform maternity service planning in future crises. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8594025/ /pubmed/34816178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.603744 Text en Copyright © 2021 Greenfield, Payne-Gifford and McKenzie. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Global Women's Health
Greenfield, Mari
Payne-Gifford, Sophie
McKenzie, Gemma
Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19
title Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19
title_full Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19
title_fullStr Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19
title_full_unstemmed Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19
title_short Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Considering “Freebirth” During Covid-19
title_sort between a rock and a hard place: considering “freebirth” during covid-19
topic Global Women's Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34816178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.603744
work_keys_str_mv AT greenfieldmari betweenarockandahardplaceconsideringfreebirthduringcovid19
AT paynegiffordsophie betweenarockandahardplaceconsideringfreebirthduringcovid19
AT mckenziegemma betweenarockandahardplaceconsideringfreebirthduringcovid19