Cargando…
Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression
BACKGROUND: The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR plus NA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2 |
_version_ | 1784599903974981632 |
---|---|
author | Benussi, Alberto Ashton, Nicholas J. Karikari, Thomas K. Alberici, Antonella Saraceno, Claudia Ghidoni, Roberta Benussi, Luisa Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Borroni, Barbara |
author_facet | Benussi, Alberto Ashton, Nicholas J. Karikari, Thomas K. Alberici, Antonella Saraceno, Claudia Ghidoni, Roberta Benussi, Luisa Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Borroni, Barbara |
author_sort | Benussi, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR plus NACC FTLD. Prodromal FTD was defined to reflect mild cognitive or behavioural impairment with relatively preserved functional independence (global CDR plus NACC = 0.5) as well as mild, moderate and severe dementia (classified as global CDR plus NACC = 1, 2, 3, respectively). Disease progression at 1-year follow-up and serum NfL measurements were acquired in a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: Of 563 participants, 138 were classified as prodromal FTD, 130 as mild, 175 as moderate and 120 as severe FTD. In the prodromal and mild phases, we observed an early increase in serum NfL levels followed by behavioural disturbances and deficits in executive functions. Negative symptoms, such as apathy, inflexibility and loss of insight, predominated in the prodromal phase. Serum NfL levels were significantly increased in the prodromal phase compared with healthy controls (average difference 14.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 26.1 pg/mL), but lower than in patients with mild FTD (average difference -15.5, 95% CI -28.4 to -2.7 pg/mL). At 1-year follow-up, 51.2% of patients in the prodromal phase had converted to dementia. Serum NfL measurements at baseline were the strongest predictors of disease progression at 1-year follow-up (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prodromal FTD is a mutable stage with high rate of progression to fully symptomatic disease at 1-year follow-up. High serum NfL levels may support prodromal FTD diagnosis and represent a helpful marker to assess disease progression. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8594126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85941262021-11-16 Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression Benussi, Alberto Ashton, Nicholas J. Karikari, Thomas K. Alberici, Antonella Saraceno, Claudia Ghidoni, Roberta Benussi, Luisa Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Borroni, Barbara Alzheimers Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: The prodromal phase of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is still not well characterized, and conversion rates to dementia and predictors of progression at 1-year follow-up are currently unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective study, disease severity was assessed using the global CDR plus NACC FTLD. Prodromal FTD was defined to reflect mild cognitive or behavioural impairment with relatively preserved functional independence (global CDR plus NACC = 0.5) as well as mild, moderate and severe dementia (classified as global CDR plus NACC = 1, 2, 3, respectively). Disease progression at 1-year follow-up and serum NfL measurements were acquired in a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: Of 563 participants, 138 were classified as prodromal FTD, 130 as mild, 175 as moderate and 120 as severe FTD. In the prodromal and mild phases, we observed an early increase in serum NfL levels followed by behavioural disturbances and deficits in executive functions. Negative symptoms, such as apathy, inflexibility and loss of insight, predominated in the prodromal phase. Serum NfL levels were significantly increased in the prodromal phase compared with healthy controls (average difference 14.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 26.1 pg/mL), but lower than in patients with mild FTD (average difference -15.5, 95% CI -28.4 to -2.7 pg/mL). At 1-year follow-up, 51.2% of patients in the prodromal phase had converted to dementia. Serum NfL measurements at baseline were the strongest predictors of disease progression at 1-year follow-up (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.11, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prodromal FTD is a mutable stage with high rate of progression to fully symptomatic disease at 1-year follow-up. High serum NfL levels may support prodromal FTD diagnosis and represent a helpful marker to assess disease progression. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2. BioMed Central 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8594126/ /pubmed/34782010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Benussi, Alberto Ashton, Nicholas J. Karikari, Thomas K. Alberici, Antonella Saraceno, Claudia Ghidoni, Roberta Benussi, Luisa Zetterberg, Henrik Blennow, Kaj Borroni, Barbara Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title | Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_full | Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_fullStr | Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_full_unstemmed | Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_short | Prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
title_sort | prodromal frontotemporal dementia: clinical features and predictors of progression |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00932-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benussialberto prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT ashtonnicholasj prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT karikarithomask prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT albericiantonella prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT saracenoclaudia prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT ghidoniroberta prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT benussiluisa prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT zetterberghenrik prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT blennowkaj prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression AT borronibarbara prodromalfrontotemporaldementiaclinicalfeaturesandpredictorsofprogression |