Cargando…

COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work

BACKGROUND: Over the last almost 20 years COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire) has become a well-established instrument to measure psychosocial stress at work. In Germany, a first validated version of COPSOQ was introduced in 2005. After the COPSOQ international network took over responsib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lincke, Hans-Joachim, Vomstein, Martin, Lindner, Alexandra, Nolle, Inga, Häberle, Nicola, Haug, Ariane, Nübling, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1
_version_ 1784599936806944768
author Lincke, Hans-Joachim
Vomstein, Martin
Lindner, Alexandra
Nolle, Inga
Häberle, Nicola
Haug, Ariane
Nübling, Matthias
author_facet Lincke, Hans-Joachim
Vomstein, Martin
Lindner, Alexandra
Nolle, Inga
Häberle, Nicola
Haug, Ariane
Nübling, Matthias
author_sort Lincke, Hans-Joachim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Over the last almost 20 years COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire) has become a well-established instrument to measure psychosocial stress at work. In Germany, a first validated version of COPSOQ was introduced in 2005. After the COPSOQ international network took over responsibility for the development of COPSOQ, a new version was published in 2019 (COPSOQ III). The German version of this questionnaire is now to be validated. METHODS: Measurement qualities of German COPSOQ III are explored in adherence to the to the usual requirements of a validation study as defined by DIN EN ISO 10075-3. A sample of observations from more than 250,000 participants surveyed with the COPSOQ in Germany is used for univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: With its 84 items the German COPSOQ III includes all psychosocial work factors that are internationally obligatory and is still compatible with almost 70% of the content in the 2005 German version. Typical psychometric properties of the questionnaire (e. g., validity and reliability) are either good or very good for most of the 84 items and 31 scales. Beyond basic results, congruences with widely used theoretical approaches like the Demand-Control(−Support) model or the Job Demands-Resources model are generally satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: With the launch of COPSOQ III in Germany, new workplace psychosocial aspects could be explored. Like the preceding version, the questionnaire is a highly useful instrument for research as well as for risk assessment in enterprises. COSPQO III covers a multitude of theoretical approaches and gives comprehensive information on psychosocial working conditions to deduce actions for their improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8594291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85942912021-11-16 COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work Lincke, Hans-Joachim Vomstein, Martin Lindner, Alexandra Nolle, Inga Häberle, Nicola Haug, Ariane Nübling, Matthias J Occup Med Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Over the last almost 20 years COPSOQ (Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire) has become a well-established instrument to measure psychosocial stress at work. In Germany, a first validated version of COPSOQ was introduced in 2005. After the COPSOQ international network took over responsibility for the development of COPSOQ, a new version was published in 2019 (COPSOQ III). The German version of this questionnaire is now to be validated. METHODS: Measurement qualities of German COPSOQ III are explored in adherence to the to the usual requirements of a validation study as defined by DIN EN ISO 10075-3. A sample of observations from more than 250,000 participants surveyed with the COPSOQ in Germany is used for univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: With its 84 items the German COPSOQ III includes all psychosocial work factors that are internationally obligatory and is still compatible with almost 70% of the content in the 2005 German version. Typical psychometric properties of the questionnaire (e. g., validity and reliability) are either good or very good for most of the 84 items and 31 scales. Beyond basic results, congruences with widely used theoretical approaches like the Demand-Control(−Support) model or the Job Demands-Resources model are generally satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: With the launch of COPSOQ III in Germany, new workplace psychosocial aspects could be explored. Like the preceding version, the questionnaire is a highly useful instrument for research as well as for risk assessment in enterprises. COSPQO III covers a multitude of theoretical approaches and gives comprehensive information on psychosocial working conditions to deduce actions for their improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1. BioMed Central 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8594291/ /pubmed/34784940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lincke, Hans-Joachim
Vomstein, Martin
Lindner, Alexandra
Nolle, Inga
Häberle, Nicola
Haug, Ariane
Nübling, Matthias
COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work
title COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work
title_full COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work
title_fullStr COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work
title_full_unstemmed COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work
title_short COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work
title_sort copsoq iii in germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34784940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1
work_keys_str_mv AT linckehansjoachim copsoqiiiingermanyvalidationofastandardinstrumenttomeasurepsychosocialfactorsatwork
AT vomsteinmartin copsoqiiiingermanyvalidationofastandardinstrumenttomeasurepsychosocialfactorsatwork
AT lindneralexandra copsoqiiiingermanyvalidationofastandardinstrumenttomeasurepsychosocialfactorsatwork
AT nolleinga copsoqiiiingermanyvalidationofastandardinstrumenttomeasurepsychosocialfactorsatwork
AT haberlenicola copsoqiiiingermanyvalidationofastandardinstrumenttomeasurepsychosocialfactorsatwork
AT haugariane copsoqiiiingermanyvalidationofastandardinstrumenttomeasurepsychosocialfactorsatwork
AT nublingmatthias copsoqiiiingermanyvalidationofastandardinstrumenttomeasurepsychosocialfactorsatwork