Cargando…
Hard tissue stability after guided bone regeneration: a comparison between digital titanium mesh and resorbable membrane
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) uses resorbable and non-resorbable membranes as biological barriers. This study compared the differences in hard tissue stability between GBR using evidence-based digital titanium mesh and resorbable collagen membranes during implant placement. A total of 40 patients (...
Autores principales: | Li, Songhang, Zhao, Junyi, Xie, Yu, Tian, Taoran, Zhang, Tianxu, Cai, Xiaoxiao |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41368-021-00143-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in oral implantology: current application and progress
por: Xie, Yu, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non‐resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial
por: Cucchi, Alessandro, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Evaluation of efficacy of non-resorbable membranes compared to resorbable membranes in patients undergoing guided bone regeneration
por: Patil, Shankargouda, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration
por: Lee, You-Jin, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Customized Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration with Autologous Bone and Xenograft
por: Bertran Faus, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)