Cargando…
How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study
PURPOSE: Rectal bleeding is a common symptom of colorectal cancer. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the operation of a central access and triage system for patients with rectal bleeding, which uses a “high-risk”/ “low-risk” designation based on the referring doctor’s subjective designation an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04063-w |
_version_ | 1784600074391650304 |
---|---|
author | Purich, Kieran Zhou, Yiling Dodd, Shawn Yuan, Yan White, Jonathan |
author_facet | Purich, Kieran Zhou, Yiling Dodd, Shawn Yuan, Yan White, Jonathan |
author_sort | Purich, Kieran |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Rectal bleeding is a common symptom of colorectal cancer. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the operation of a central access and triage system for patients with rectal bleeding, which uses a “high-risk”/ “low-risk” designation based on the referring doctor’s subjective designation and a 10-item symptom checklist. METHODS: A total of 1846 patients, referred between February 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, were included. Exclusion criteria were the following: incorrect patient identification number, duplicate records, and pre-diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer. Data was obtained by chart review. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each item on the symptom checklist. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-nine (48%) patients received endoscopy, and 37 (2%) were found to have cancer. Five hundred eighty-two (32%) patients were deemed high-risk. Twenty-nine (78%) of the patients with cancer were in the high-risk group. Patients in the high-risk group had a higher incidence of cancer (5.0% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001) and shorter waits to endoscopy (201 vs 292 days). Patients designated as high-risk by the referring physician had a relative risk of 22.3 compared to those designated as low-risk. Patients deemed high-risk by the symptom checklist had a relative risk of 3.5 compared to low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Our system stratified 29/37 (78%) of the patients found to have cancer as high-risk. A total of 8/37 (22%) patients with cancer were deemed low-risk. Our research has identified two variables (weight loss and anemia) which have been added to our referral symptom checklist. This study helped us identify areas for refinement of our triage system. These findings are of interest to physicians who treat colorectal cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-021-04063-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8594862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85948622021-11-17 How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study Purich, Kieran Zhou, Yiling Dodd, Shawn Yuan, Yan White, Jonathan Int J Colorectal Dis Original Article PURPOSE: Rectal bleeding is a common symptom of colorectal cancer. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the operation of a central access and triage system for patients with rectal bleeding, which uses a “high-risk”/ “low-risk” designation based on the referring doctor’s subjective designation and a 10-item symptom checklist. METHODS: A total of 1846 patients, referred between February 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, were included. Exclusion criteria were the following: incorrect patient identification number, duplicate records, and pre-diagnosed gastrointestinal cancer. Data was obtained by chart review. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each item on the symptom checklist. RESULTS: Eight hundred seventy-nine (48%) patients received endoscopy, and 37 (2%) were found to have cancer. Five hundred eighty-two (32%) patients were deemed high-risk. Twenty-nine (78%) of the patients with cancer were in the high-risk group. Patients in the high-risk group had a higher incidence of cancer (5.0% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001) and shorter waits to endoscopy (201 vs 292 days). Patients designated as high-risk by the referring physician had a relative risk of 22.3 compared to those designated as low-risk. Patients deemed high-risk by the symptom checklist had a relative risk of 3.5 compared to low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Our system stratified 29/37 (78%) of the patients found to have cancer as high-risk. A total of 8/37 (22%) patients with cancer were deemed low-risk. Our research has identified two variables (weight loss and anemia) which have been added to our referral symptom checklist. This study helped us identify areas for refinement of our triage system. These findings are of interest to physicians who treat colorectal cancer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00384-021-04063-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8594862/ /pubmed/34786597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04063-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Purich, Kieran Zhou, Yiling Dodd, Shawn Yuan, Yan White, Jonathan How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study |
title | How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study |
title_full | How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study |
title_fullStr | How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study |
title_short | How can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? An observational study |
title_sort | how can we better identify patients with rectal bleeding who are at high risk of colorectal cancer? an observational study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04063-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT purichkieran howcanwebetteridentifypatientswithrectalbleedingwhoareathighriskofcolorectalcanceranobservationalstudy AT zhouyiling howcanwebetteridentifypatientswithrectalbleedingwhoareathighriskofcolorectalcanceranobservationalstudy AT doddshawn howcanwebetteridentifypatientswithrectalbleedingwhoareathighriskofcolorectalcanceranobservationalstudy AT yuanyan howcanwebetteridentifypatientswithrectalbleedingwhoareathighriskofcolorectalcanceranobservationalstudy AT whitejonathan howcanwebetteridentifypatientswithrectalbleedingwhoareathighriskofcolorectalcanceranobservationalstudy |