Cargando…

Social selectivity and social motivation in voles

Selective relationships are fundamental to humans and many other animals, but relationships between mates, family members, or peers may be mediated differently. We examined connections between social reward and social selectivity, aggression, and oxytocin receptor signaling pathways in rodents that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beery, Annaliese K, Lopez, Sarah A, Blandino, Katrina L, Lee, Nicole S, Bourdon, Natalie S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726153
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72684
_version_ 1784600083411501056
author Beery, Annaliese K
Lopez, Sarah A
Blandino, Katrina L
Lee, Nicole S
Bourdon, Natalie S
author_facet Beery, Annaliese K
Lopez, Sarah A
Blandino, Katrina L
Lee, Nicole S
Bourdon, Natalie S
author_sort Beery, Annaliese K
collection PubMed
description Selective relationships are fundamental to humans and many other animals, but relationships between mates, family members, or peers may be mediated differently. We examined connections between social reward and social selectivity, aggression, and oxytocin receptor signaling pathways in rodents that naturally form enduring, selective relationships with mates and peers (monogamous prairie voles) or peers (group-living meadow voles). Female prairie and meadow voles worked harder to access familiar versus unfamiliar individuals, regardless of sex, and huddled extensively with familiar subjects. Male prairie voles displayed strongly selective huddling preferences for familiar animals, but only worked harder to repeatedly access females versus males, with no difference in effort by familiarity. This reveals a striking sex difference in pathways underlying social monogamy and demonstrates a fundamental disconnect between motivation and social selectivity in males—a distinction not detected by the partner preference test. Meadow voles exhibited social preferences but low social motivation, consistent with tolerance rather than reward supporting social groups in this species. Natural variation in oxytocin receptor binding predicted individual variation in prosocial and aggressive behaviors. These results provide a basis for understanding species, sex, and individual differences in the mechanisms underlying the role of social reward in social preference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8594915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85949152021-11-17 Social selectivity and social motivation in voles Beery, Annaliese K Lopez, Sarah A Blandino, Katrina L Lee, Nicole S Bourdon, Natalie S eLife Neuroscience Selective relationships are fundamental to humans and many other animals, but relationships between mates, family members, or peers may be mediated differently. We examined connections between social reward and social selectivity, aggression, and oxytocin receptor signaling pathways in rodents that naturally form enduring, selective relationships with mates and peers (monogamous prairie voles) or peers (group-living meadow voles). Female prairie and meadow voles worked harder to access familiar versus unfamiliar individuals, regardless of sex, and huddled extensively with familiar subjects. Male prairie voles displayed strongly selective huddling preferences for familiar animals, but only worked harder to repeatedly access females versus males, with no difference in effort by familiarity. This reveals a striking sex difference in pathways underlying social monogamy and demonstrates a fundamental disconnect between motivation and social selectivity in males—a distinction not detected by the partner preference test. Meadow voles exhibited social preferences but low social motivation, consistent with tolerance rather than reward supporting social groups in this species. Natural variation in oxytocin receptor binding predicted individual variation in prosocial and aggressive behaviors. These results provide a basis for understanding species, sex, and individual differences in the mechanisms underlying the role of social reward in social preference. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8594915/ /pubmed/34726153 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72684 Text en © 2021, Beery et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Beery, Annaliese K
Lopez, Sarah A
Blandino, Katrina L
Lee, Nicole S
Bourdon, Natalie S
Social selectivity and social motivation in voles
title Social selectivity and social motivation in voles
title_full Social selectivity and social motivation in voles
title_fullStr Social selectivity and social motivation in voles
title_full_unstemmed Social selectivity and social motivation in voles
title_short Social selectivity and social motivation in voles
title_sort social selectivity and social motivation in voles
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726153
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72684
work_keys_str_mv AT beeryannaliesek socialselectivityandsocialmotivationinvoles
AT lopezsaraha socialselectivityandsocialmotivationinvoles
AT blandinokatrinal socialselectivityandsocialmotivationinvoles
AT leenicoles socialselectivityandsocialmotivationinvoles
AT bourdonnatalies socialselectivityandsocialmotivationinvoles