Cargando…
Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals
AIMS: A glide path is created prior to root canal instrumentation by nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files to increase the efficiency and safety of cleaning and shaping. This study aimed to assess root canal transportation in use of different glide path files in curved canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4898684 |
_version_ | 1784600094550523904 |
---|---|
author | Shojaeian, Shiva Mortezapour, Niloofar Soltaninejad, Fatemeh Zargar, Nazanin Zandi, Babak Shantiaee, Yazdan Bidaki, Amin |
author_facet | Shojaeian, Shiva Mortezapour, Niloofar Soltaninejad, Fatemeh Zargar, Nazanin Zandi, Babak Shantiaee, Yazdan Bidaki, Amin |
author_sort | Shojaeian, Shiva |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: A glide path is created prior to root canal instrumentation by nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files to increase the efficiency and safety of cleaning and shaping. This study aimed to assess root canal transportation in use of different glide path files in curved canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 sound mesiobuccal root canals of mandibular molars with 20° to 40° curvature were selected and randomly assigned to 3 groups of EdgeGlidePath (EGP, EdgeEndo), One-G (Micro-Mega), and Neolix (Neoniti). The specimens were scanned before and after glide path creation by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). The pre- and postoperative micro-CT scans were superimposed, and the degree of canal transportation and centering ratio were measured at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm distances from the apical foramen. Statistical Analysis. The data were analyzed by two-way and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The effects of distance from the apical foramen and instrument type and the interaction effect of the two were not significant on the centering ability of the files or canal transportation. CONCLUSION: EdgeGlidePath, One-G, and Neolix files fabricated from the conventional NiTi alloy or heat-treated M-Wire alloy showed similar performance regarding centering ability and canal transportation in glide path preparation in curved canals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8594984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85949842021-11-17 Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals Shojaeian, Shiva Mortezapour, Niloofar Soltaninejad, Fatemeh Zargar, Nazanin Zandi, Babak Shantiaee, Yazdan Bidaki, Amin Int J Dent Research Article AIMS: A glide path is created prior to root canal instrumentation by nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files to increase the efficiency and safety of cleaning and shaping. This study aimed to assess root canal transportation in use of different glide path files in curved canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 sound mesiobuccal root canals of mandibular molars with 20° to 40° curvature were selected and randomly assigned to 3 groups of EdgeGlidePath (EGP, EdgeEndo), One-G (Micro-Mega), and Neolix (Neoniti). The specimens were scanned before and after glide path creation by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). The pre- and postoperative micro-CT scans were superimposed, and the degree of canal transportation and centering ratio were measured at 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm distances from the apical foramen. Statistical Analysis. The data were analyzed by two-way and one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: The effects of distance from the apical foramen and instrument type and the interaction effect of the two were not significant on the centering ability of the files or canal transportation. CONCLUSION: EdgeGlidePath, One-G, and Neolix files fabricated from the conventional NiTi alloy or heat-treated M-Wire alloy showed similar performance regarding centering ability and canal transportation in glide path preparation in curved canals. Hindawi 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8594984/ /pubmed/34795762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4898684 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shiva Shojaeian et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shojaeian, Shiva Mortezapour, Niloofar Soltaninejad, Fatemeh Zargar, Nazanin Zandi, Babak Shantiaee, Yazdan Bidaki, Amin Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals |
title | Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals |
title_full | Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals |
title_short | Comparison of Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of One-G, EdgeGlidePath, and Neolix: A MicroComputed Tomography Study of Curved Root Canals |
title_sort | comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of one-g, edgeglidepath, and neolix: a microcomputed tomography study of curved root canals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8594984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/4898684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shojaeianshiva comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT mortezapourniloofar comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT soltaninejadfatemeh comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT zargarnazanin comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT zandibabak comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT shantiaeeyazdan comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals AT bidakiamin comparisonofcanaltransportationandcenteringabilityofonegedgeglidepathandneolixamicrocomputedtomographystudyofcurvedrootcanals |