Cargando…

Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database

This study presents an application of machine learning (ML) methods for detecting the presence of stenoses and aneurysms in the human arterial system. Four major forms of arterial disease—carotid artery stenosis (CAS), subclavian artery stenosis (SAS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and abdomina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, G., Parr, J., Nithiarasu, P., Pant, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34333696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01497-7
_version_ 1784600152020877312
author Jones, G.
Parr, J.
Nithiarasu, P.
Pant, S.
author_facet Jones, G.
Parr, J.
Nithiarasu, P.
Pant, S.
author_sort Jones, G.
collection PubMed
description This study presents an application of machine learning (ML) methods for detecting the presence of stenoses and aneurysms in the human arterial system. Four major forms of arterial disease—carotid artery stenosis (CAS), subclavian artery stenosis (SAS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA)—are considered. The ML methods are trained and tested on a physiologically realistic virtual patient database (VPD) containing 28,868 healthy subjects, adapted from the authors previous work and augmented to include disease. It is found that the tree-based methods of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting outperform other approaches. The performance of ML methods is quantified through the [Formula: see text] score and computation of sensitivities and specificities. When using six haemodynamic measurements (pressure in the common carotid, brachial, and radial arteries; and flow-rate in the common carotid, brachial, and femoral arteries), it is found that maximum [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.9 are achieved for CAS and PAD, larger than 0.85 for SAS, and larger than 0.98 for both low- and high-severity AAAs. Corresponding sensitivities and specificities are larger than 90% for CAS and PAD, larger than 85% for SAS, and larger than 98% for both low- and high-severity AAAs. When reducing the number of measurements, performance is degraded by less than 5% when three measurements are used, and less than 10% when only two measurements are used for classification. For AAA, it is shown that [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.85 and corresponding sensitivities and specificities larger than 85% are achievable when using only a single measurement. The results are encouraging to pursue AAA monitoring and screening through wearable devices which can reliably measure pressure or flow-rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8595223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85952232021-11-24 Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database Jones, G. Parr, J. Nithiarasu, P. Pant, S. Biomech Model Mechanobiol Original Paper This study presents an application of machine learning (ML) methods for detecting the presence of stenoses and aneurysms in the human arterial system. Four major forms of arterial disease—carotid artery stenosis (CAS), subclavian artery stenosis (SAS), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA)—are considered. The ML methods are trained and tested on a physiologically realistic virtual patient database (VPD) containing 28,868 healthy subjects, adapted from the authors previous work and augmented to include disease. It is found that the tree-based methods of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting outperform other approaches. The performance of ML methods is quantified through the [Formula: see text] score and computation of sensitivities and specificities. When using six haemodynamic measurements (pressure in the common carotid, brachial, and radial arteries; and flow-rate in the common carotid, brachial, and femoral arteries), it is found that maximum [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.9 are achieved for CAS and PAD, larger than 0.85 for SAS, and larger than 0.98 for both low- and high-severity AAAs. Corresponding sensitivities and specificities are larger than 90% for CAS and PAD, larger than 85% for SAS, and larger than 98% for both low- and high-severity AAAs. When reducing the number of measurements, performance is degraded by less than 5% when three measurements are used, and less than 10% when only two measurements are used for classification. For AAA, it is shown that [Formula: see text] scores larger than 0.85 and corresponding sensitivities and specificities larger than 85% are achievable when using only a single measurement. The results are encouraging to pursue AAA monitoring and screening through wearable devices which can reliably measure pressure or flow-rates. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-31 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8595223/ /pubmed/34333696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01497-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jones, G.
Parr, J.
Nithiarasu, P.
Pant, S.
Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database
title Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database
title_full Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database
title_fullStr Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database
title_short Machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database
title_sort machine learning for detection of stenoses and aneurysms: application in a physiologically realistic virtual patient database
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34333696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01497-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesg machinelearningfordetectionofstenosesandaneurysmsapplicationinaphysiologicallyrealisticvirtualpatientdatabase
AT parrj machinelearningfordetectionofstenosesandaneurysmsapplicationinaphysiologicallyrealisticvirtualpatientdatabase
AT nithiarasup machinelearningfordetectionofstenosesandaneurysmsapplicationinaphysiologicallyrealisticvirtualpatientdatabase
AT pants machinelearningfordetectionofstenosesandaneurysmsapplicationinaphysiologicallyrealisticvirtualpatientdatabase