Cargando…
The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene
The predictable rhythmic structure is important to most ecologically relevant sounds for humans, such as is found in the rhythm of speech or music. This study addressed the question of how rhythmic predictions are maintained in the auditory system when there are multiple perceptual interpretations o...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.747769 |
_version_ | 1784600162917679104 |
---|---|
author | Brace, Kelin M. Sussman, Elyse S. |
author_facet | Brace, Kelin M. Sussman, Elyse S. |
author_sort | Brace, Kelin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The predictable rhythmic structure is important to most ecologically relevant sounds for humans, such as is found in the rhythm of speech or music. This study addressed the question of how rhythmic predictions are maintained in the auditory system when there are multiple perceptual interpretations occurring simultaneously and emanating from the same sound source. We recorded the electroencephalogram (EEG) while presenting participants with a tone sequence that had two different tone feature patterns, one based on the sequential rhythmic variation in tone duration and the other on sequential rhythmic variation in tone intensity. Participants were presented with the same sound sequences and were instructed to listen for the intensity pattern (ignore fluctuations in duration) and press a response key to detected pattern deviants (attend intensity pattern task); to listen to the duration pattern (ignore fluctuations in intensity) and make a button press to duration pattern deviants (attend duration pattern task), and to watch a movie and ignore the sounds presented to their ears (attend visual task). Both intensity and duration patterns occurred predictably 85% of the time, thus the key question involved evaluating how the brain treated the irrelevant feature patterns (standards and deviants) while performing an auditory or visual task. We expected that task-based feature patterns would have a more robust brain response to attended standards and deviants than the unattended feature patterns. Instead, we found that the neural entrainment to the rhythm of the standard attended patterns had similar power to the standard of the unattended feature patterns. In addition, the infrequent pattern deviants elicited the event-related brain potential called the mismatch negativity component (MMN). The MMN elicited by task-based feature pattern deviants had a similar amplitude to MMNs elicited by unattended pattern deviants that were unattended because they were not the target pattern or because the participant ignored the sounds and watched a movie. Thus, these results demonstrate that the brain tracks multiple predictions about the complexities in sound streams and can automatically track and detect deviations with respect to these predictions. This capability would be useful for switching attention rapidly among multiple objects in a busy auditory scene. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8595267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85952672021-11-18 The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene Brace, Kelin M. Sussman, Elyse S. Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience The predictable rhythmic structure is important to most ecologically relevant sounds for humans, such as is found in the rhythm of speech or music. This study addressed the question of how rhythmic predictions are maintained in the auditory system when there are multiple perceptual interpretations occurring simultaneously and emanating from the same sound source. We recorded the electroencephalogram (EEG) while presenting participants with a tone sequence that had two different tone feature patterns, one based on the sequential rhythmic variation in tone duration and the other on sequential rhythmic variation in tone intensity. Participants were presented with the same sound sequences and were instructed to listen for the intensity pattern (ignore fluctuations in duration) and press a response key to detected pattern deviants (attend intensity pattern task); to listen to the duration pattern (ignore fluctuations in intensity) and make a button press to duration pattern deviants (attend duration pattern task), and to watch a movie and ignore the sounds presented to their ears (attend visual task). Both intensity and duration patterns occurred predictably 85% of the time, thus the key question involved evaluating how the brain treated the irrelevant feature patterns (standards and deviants) while performing an auditory or visual task. We expected that task-based feature patterns would have a more robust brain response to attended standards and deviants than the unattended feature patterns. Instead, we found that the neural entrainment to the rhythm of the standard attended patterns had similar power to the standard of the unattended feature patterns. In addition, the infrequent pattern deviants elicited the event-related brain potential called the mismatch negativity component (MMN). The MMN elicited by task-based feature pattern deviants had a similar amplitude to MMNs elicited by unattended pattern deviants that were unattended because they were not the target pattern or because the participant ignored the sounds and watched a movie. Thus, these results demonstrate that the brain tracks multiple predictions about the complexities in sound streams and can automatically track and detect deviations with respect to these predictions. This capability would be useful for switching attention rapidly among multiple objects in a busy auditory scene. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8595267/ /pubmed/34803633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.747769 Text en Copyright © 2021 Brace and Sussman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Brace, Kelin M. Sussman, Elyse S. The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene |
title | The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene |
title_full | The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene |
title_fullStr | The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene |
title_full_unstemmed | The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene |
title_short | The Brain Tracks Multiple Predictions About the Auditory Scene |
title_sort | brain tracks multiple predictions about the auditory scene |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803633 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.747769 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bracekelinm thebraintracksmultiplepredictionsabouttheauditoryscene AT sussmanelyses thebraintracksmultiplepredictionsabouttheauditoryscene AT bracekelinm braintracksmultiplepredictionsabouttheauditoryscene AT sussmanelyses braintracksmultiplepredictionsabouttheauditoryscene |