Cargando…
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations
Objective: Inhibitory control training (ICT) has shown promise for improving health behaviours, however, less is known about its mediators of effectiveness. The current paper reports whether ICT reduces smoking-related outcomes such as craving and nicotine dependence, increases motivation to quit an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759270 |
_version_ | 1784600238427734016 |
---|---|
author | Hughes, Laura K. Hayden, Melissa J. Bos, Jason Lawrence, Natalia S. Youssef, George J. Borland, Ron Staiger, Petra K. |
author_facet | Hughes, Laura K. Hayden, Melissa J. Bos, Jason Lawrence, Natalia S. Youssef, George J. Borland, Ron Staiger, Petra K. |
author_sort | Hughes, Laura K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Inhibitory control training (ICT) has shown promise for improving health behaviours, however, less is known about its mediators of effectiveness. The current paper reports whether ICT reduces smoking-related outcomes such as craving and nicotine dependence, increases motivation to quit and whether reductions in smoking or craving are mediated by response inhibition or a devaluation of smoking stimuli. Method: Adult smokers (minimum 10 cigarettes per day; N = 107, M(age) = 46.15 years, 57 female) were randomly allocated to receive 14 days of smoking-specific ICT (named INST; a go/no-go task where participants were trained to not respond to smoking stimuli) or active control training (participants inhibited responding toward neutral stimuli). Participants were followed up to 3-months post-intervention. This trial was preregistered (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12617000252314; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370204). Results: There were no significant differences between ICT and active control training groups. Specifically, participants in both groups showed significant reductions in craving, nicotine dependence, motivation and a devaluation (reduced evaluation) of smoking-stimuli up to 3-months follow-up compared to baseline. Inhibition and devaluation of smoking stimuli did not act as mediators. Devaluation of smoking stimuli was an independent predictor of smoking and craving at follow-up. Conclusion: Inhibitory control training (ICT) was no more effective at reducing smoking-related outcomes compared to the active control group, however, significant improvements in craving, dependence indicators and evaluation of smoking stimuli were observed across both groups. A return to basic experimental research may be required to understand the most effective ICT approach to support smoking cessation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8595834 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85958342021-11-18 A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations Hughes, Laura K. Hayden, Melissa J. Bos, Jason Lawrence, Natalia S. Youssef, George J. Borland, Ron Staiger, Petra K. Front Psychol Psychology Objective: Inhibitory control training (ICT) has shown promise for improving health behaviours, however, less is known about its mediators of effectiveness. The current paper reports whether ICT reduces smoking-related outcomes such as craving and nicotine dependence, increases motivation to quit and whether reductions in smoking or craving are mediated by response inhibition or a devaluation of smoking stimuli. Method: Adult smokers (minimum 10 cigarettes per day; N = 107, M(age) = 46.15 years, 57 female) were randomly allocated to receive 14 days of smoking-specific ICT (named INST; a go/no-go task where participants were trained to not respond to smoking stimuli) or active control training (participants inhibited responding toward neutral stimuli). Participants were followed up to 3-months post-intervention. This trial was preregistered (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12617000252314; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370204). Results: There were no significant differences between ICT and active control training groups. Specifically, participants in both groups showed significant reductions in craving, nicotine dependence, motivation and a devaluation (reduced evaluation) of smoking-stimuli up to 3-months follow-up compared to baseline. Inhibition and devaluation of smoking stimuli did not act as mediators. Devaluation of smoking stimuli was an independent predictor of smoking and craving at follow-up. Conclusion: Inhibitory control training (ICT) was no more effective at reducing smoking-related outcomes compared to the active control group, however, significant improvements in craving, dependence indicators and evaluation of smoking stimuli were observed across both groups. A return to basic experimental research may be required to understand the most effective ICT approach to support smoking cessation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8595834/ /pubmed/34803842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759270 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hughes, Hayden, Bos, Lawrence, Youssef, Borland and Staiger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hughes, Laura K. Hayden, Melissa J. Bos, Jason Lawrence, Natalia S. Youssef, George J. Borland, Ron Staiger, Petra K. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations |
title | A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations |
title_full | A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations |
title_fullStr | A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations |
title_short | A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial of inhibitory control training for smoking cessation: outcomes, mediators and methodological considerations |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595834/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759270 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hugheslaurak arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT haydenmelissaj arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT bosjason arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT lawrencenatalias arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT youssefgeorgej arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT borlandron arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT staigerpetrak arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT hugheslaurak randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT haydenmelissaj randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT bosjason randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT lawrencenatalias randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT youssefgeorgej randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT borlandron randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations AT staigerpetrak randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations |