Cargando…

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations

Objective: Inhibitory control training (ICT) has shown promise for improving health behaviours, however, less is known about its mediators of effectiveness. The current paper reports whether ICT reduces smoking-related outcomes such as craving and nicotine dependence, increases motivation to quit an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Laura K., Hayden, Melissa J., Bos, Jason, Lawrence, Natalia S., Youssef, George J., Borland, Ron, Staiger, Petra K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759270
_version_ 1784600238427734016
author Hughes, Laura K.
Hayden, Melissa J.
Bos, Jason
Lawrence, Natalia S.
Youssef, George J.
Borland, Ron
Staiger, Petra K.
author_facet Hughes, Laura K.
Hayden, Melissa J.
Bos, Jason
Lawrence, Natalia S.
Youssef, George J.
Borland, Ron
Staiger, Petra K.
author_sort Hughes, Laura K.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Inhibitory control training (ICT) has shown promise for improving health behaviours, however, less is known about its mediators of effectiveness. The current paper reports whether ICT reduces smoking-related outcomes such as craving and nicotine dependence, increases motivation to quit and whether reductions in smoking or craving are mediated by response inhibition or a devaluation of smoking stimuli. Method: Adult smokers (minimum 10 cigarettes per day; N = 107, M(age) = 46.15 years, 57 female) were randomly allocated to receive 14 days of smoking-specific ICT (named INST; a go/no-go task where participants were trained to not respond to smoking stimuli) or active control training (participants inhibited responding toward neutral stimuli). Participants were followed up to 3-months post-intervention. This trial was preregistered (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12617000252314; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370204). Results: There were no significant differences between ICT and active control training groups. Specifically, participants in both groups showed significant reductions in craving, nicotine dependence, motivation and a devaluation (reduced evaluation) of smoking-stimuli up to 3-months follow-up compared to baseline. Inhibition and devaluation of smoking stimuli did not act as mediators. Devaluation of smoking stimuli was an independent predictor of smoking and craving at follow-up. Conclusion: Inhibitory control training (ICT) was no more effective at reducing smoking-related outcomes compared to the active control group, however, significant improvements in craving, dependence indicators and evaluation of smoking stimuli were observed across both groups. A return to basic experimental research may be required to understand the most effective ICT approach to support smoking cessation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8595834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85958342021-11-18 A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations Hughes, Laura K. Hayden, Melissa J. Bos, Jason Lawrence, Natalia S. Youssef, George J. Borland, Ron Staiger, Petra K. Front Psychol Psychology Objective: Inhibitory control training (ICT) has shown promise for improving health behaviours, however, less is known about its mediators of effectiveness. The current paper reports whether ICT reduces smoking-related outcomes such as craving and nicotine dependence, increases motivation to quit and whether reductions in smoking or craving are mediated by response inhibition or a devaluation of smoking stimuli. Method: Adult smokers (minimum 10 cigarettes per day; N = 107, M(age) = 46.15 years, 57 female) were randomly allocated to receive 14 days of smoking-specific ICT (named INST; a go/no-go task where participants were trained to not respond to smoking stimuli) or active control training (participants inhibited responding toward neutral stimuli). Participants were followed up to 3-months post-intervention. This trial was preregistered (Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12617000252314; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370204). Results: There were no significant differences between ICT and active control training groups. Specifically, participants in both groups showed significant reductions in craving, nicotine dependence, motivation and a devaluation (reduced evaluation) of smoking-stimuli up to 3-months follow-up compared to baseline. Inhibition and devaluation of smoking stimuli did not act as mediators. Devaluation of smoking stimuli was an independent predictor of smoking and craving at follow-up. Conclusion: Inhibitory control training (ICT) was no more effective at reducing smoking-related outcomes compared to the active control group, however, significant improvements in craving, dependence indicators and evaluation of smoking stimuli were observed across both groups. A return to basic experimental research may be required to understand the most effective ICT approach to support smoking cessation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8595834/ /pubmed/34803842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759270 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hughes, Hayden, Bos, Lawrence, Youssef, Borland and Staiger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hughes, Laura K.
Hayden, Melissa J.
Bos, Jason
Lawrence, Natalia S.
Youssef, George J.
Borland, Ron
Staiger, Petra K.
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations
title A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations
title_full A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations
title_fullStr A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations
title_full_unstemmed A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations
title_short A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations
title_sort randomised controlled trial of inhibitory control training for smoking cessation: outcomes, mediators and methodological considerations
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34803842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759270
work_keys_str_mv AT hugheslaurak arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT haydenmelissaj arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT bosjason arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT lawrencenatalias arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT youssefgeorgej arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT borlandron arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT staigerpetrak arandomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT hugheslaurak randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT haydenmelissaj randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT bosjason randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT lawrencenatalias randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT youssefgeorgej randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT borlandron randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT staigerpetrak randomisedcontrolledtrialofinhibitorycontroltrainingforsmokingcessationoutcomesmediatorsandmethodologicalconsiderations