Cargando…

Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT

BACKGROUND: Since progesterone alone does not seem to be enough for luteal phase support (LPS), especially in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, so gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is suggested as an adjuvant therapy in combination with progesterone for LPS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zareii, Afsoon, Davoodi, Sara, Alborzi, Mahshid, Moghadam, Marzieh Eslami, Askary, Elham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Knowledge E 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805726
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v19i10.9817
_version_ 1784600246470311936
author Zareii, Afsoon
Davoodi, Sara
Alborzi, Mahshid
Moghadam, Marzieh Eslami
Askary, Elham
author_facet Zareii, Afsoon
Davoodi, Sara
Alborzi, Mahshid
Moghadam, Marzieh Eslami
Askary, Elham
author_sort Zareii, Afsoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since progesterone alone does not seem to be enough for luteal phase support (LPS), especially in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, so gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is suggested as an adjuvant therapy in combination with progesterone for LPS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the administration of GnRH-a with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone alone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 240 infertile women who were candidates for FET were evaluated into two groups (n = 120/each). Group I received 400 mg vaginal progesterone twice a day from the time of transfer. The second group received vaginal progesterone and also 0.1 mg diphereline on days 0, 3, and 6 of FET for LPS. Finally, the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, and the implantation, and spontaneous abortion rates were compared in two groups. RESULTS: Results showed that there was no significant difference between the mean age of women and the duration of infertility (p = 0.78, p = 0.58, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in the terms of implantation and spontaneous abortion rates (p = 0.19, p = 0.31, respectively). However, in terms of clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, the significant differences were seen between groups (p = 0.008 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Co-administration of GnRH-a and vaginal progesterone in LPS may be superior to vaginal progesterone alone in women who underwent a frozen-selected embryo transfer cycle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8595909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Knowledge E
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85959092021-11-19 Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT Zareii, Afsoon Davoodi, Sara Alborzi, Mahshid Moghadam, Marzieh Eslami Askary, Elham Int J Reprod Biomed Original Article BACKGROUND: Since progesterone alone does not seem to be enough for luteal phase support (LPS), especially in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, so gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is suggested as an adjuvant therapy in combination with progesterone for LPS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the administration of GnRH-a with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone alone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 240 infertile women who were candidates for FET were evaluated into two groups (n = 120/each). Group I received 400 mg vaginal progesterone twice a day from the time of transfer. The second group received vaginal progesterone and also 0.1 mg diphereline on days 0, 3, and 6 of FET for LPS. Finally, the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, and the implantation, and spontaneous abortion rates were compared in two groups. RESULTS: Results showed that there was no significant difference between the mean age of women and the duration of infertility (p = 0.78, p = 0.58, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in the terms of implantation and spontaneous abortion rates (p = 0.19, p = 0.31, respectively). However, in terms of clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, the significant differences were seen between groups (p = 0.008 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Co-administration of GnRH-a and vaginal progesterone in LPS may be superior to vaginal progesterone alone in women who underwent a frozen-selected embryo transfer cycle. Knowledge E 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8595909/ /pubmed/34805726 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v19i10.9817 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zareii et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zareii, Afsoon
Davoodi, Sara
Alborzi, Mahshid
Moghadam, Marzieh Eslami
Askary, Elham
Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT
title Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT
title_full Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT
title_fullStr Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT
title_full_unstemmed Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT
title_short Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT
title_sort co-administration of gnrh agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: an rct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34805726
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v19i10.9817
work_keys_str_mv AT zareiiafsoon coadministrationofgnrhagonistswithvaginalprogesteronecomparedtovaginalprogesteroneinlutealphasesupportofthefrozenthawedembryotransfercycleanrct
AT davoodisara coadministrationofgnrhagonistswithvaginalprogesteronecomparedtovaginalprogesteroneinlutealphasesupportofthefrozenthawedembryotransfercycleanrct
AT alborzimahshid coadministrationofgnrhagonistswithvaginalprogesteronecomparedtovaginalprogesteroneinlutealphasesupportofthefrozenthawedembryotransfercycleanrct
AT moghadammarzieheslami coadministrationofgnrhagonistswithvaginalprogesteronecomparedtovaginalprogesteroneinlutealphasesupportofthefrozenthawedembryotransfercycleanrct
AT askaryelham coadministrationofgnrhagonistswithvaginalprogesteronecomparedtovaginalprogesteroneinlutealphasesupportofthefrozenthawedembryotransfercycleanrct