Cargando…

Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness (VE) against concerned outcomes in real-world settings. METHODS: Studies reporting COVID-19 VE from August 6, 2020 to October 6, 2021 were included. The summary VE (with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)) against di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Caifang, Shao, Weihao, Chen, Xiaorui, Zhang, Bowen, Wang, Gaili, Zhang, Weidong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Zhengzhou University. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.009
_version_ 1784600263053541376
author Zheng, Caifang
Shao, Weihao
Chen, Xiaorui
Zhang, Bowen
Wang, Gaili
Zhang, Weidong
author_facet Zheng, Caifang
Shao, Weihao
Chen, Xiaorui
Zhang, Bowen
Wang, Gaili
Zhang, Weidong
author_sort Zheng, Caifang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness (VE) against concerned outcomes in real-world settings. METHODS: Studies reporting COVID-19 VE from August 6, 2020 to October 6, 2021 were included. The summary VE (with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)) against disease related to COVID-19 was estimated. The results were presented in forest plots. Predefined subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 51 records were included in this meta-analysis. In fully vaccinated populations, the VE against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, COVID-19-related hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit, and death was 89.1% (95% CI 85.6–92.6%), 97.2% (95% CI 96.1–98.3%), 97.4% (95% CI 96.0–98.8%), and 99.0% (95% CI 98.5–99.6%), respectively. The VE against infection in the general population aged ≥16 years, the elderly, and healthcare workers was 86.1% (95% CI 77.8–94.4%), 83.8% (95% CI 77.1–90.6%), and 95.3% (95% CI 92.0–98.6%), respectively. For those fully vaccinated against infection, the observed effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 91.2% and of the Moderna vaccine was 98.1%, while the effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine was found to be 65.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 vaccines are highly protective against SARS-CoV-2-related diseases in real-world settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8595975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Zhengzhou University. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85959752021-11-17 Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis Zheng, Caifang Shao, Weihao Chen, Xiaorui Zhang, Bowen Wang, Gaili Zhang, Weidong Int J Infect Dis Review OBJECTIVE: To estimate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness (VE) against concerned outcomes in real-world settings. METHODS: Studies reporting COVID-19 VE from August 6, 2020 to October 6, 2021 were included. The summary VE (with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)) against disease related to COVID-19 was estimated. The results were presented in forest plots. Predefined subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 51 records were included in this meta-analysis. In fully vaccinated populations, the VE against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, COVID-19-related hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit, and death was 89.1% (95% CI 85.6–92.6%), 97.2% (95% CI 96.1–98.3%), 97.4% (95% CI 96.0–98.8%), and 99.0% (95% CI 98.5–99.6%), respectively. The VE against infection in the general population aged ≥16 years, the elderly, and healthcare workers was 86.1% (95% CI 77.8–94.4%), 83.8% (95% CI 77.1–90.6%), and 95.3% (95% CI 92.0–98.6%), respectively. For those fully vaccinated against infection, the observed effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 91.2% and of the Moderna vaccine was 98.1%, while the effectiveness of the CoronaVac vaccine was found to be 65.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 vaccines are highly protective against SARS-CoV-2-related diseases in real-world settings. Zhengzhou University. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2022-01 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8595975/ /pubmed/34800687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.009 Text en © 2021 Zhengzhou University Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Zheng, Caifang
Shao, Weihao
Chen, Xiaorui
Zhang, Bowen
Wang, Gaili
Zhang, Weidong
Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis
title Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis
title_full Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis
title_short Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis
title_sort real-world effectiveness of covid-19 vaccines: a literature review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34800687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.009
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengcaifang realworldeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinesaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT shaoweihao realworldeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinesaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenxiaorui realworldeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinesaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangbowen realworldeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinesaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanggaili realworldeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinesaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangweidong realworldeffectivenessofcovid19vaccinesaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis